DUI Charges Carry Very Stiff Penalties

February 19, 2010 by Maricopa County Court  
Filed under Criminal Court, DUI

By Nick MesseIt is an intimidating sight to see those flashing blue lights in one’s rear view mirror for a minor traffic offense. Seeing those lights for a DUI (Driving Under the Influence) charge is a terrifying experience. A DUI arrest carries severe penalties and may affect a person’s ability to gain employment for a long time. Many states have implemented plans in an effort to both prevent drunk driving and penalize those who do.

Some of these plans are subtle. For example, Illinois allows the families of those who have been killed by a drunk driver to put up roadside markers. We have all seen little crosses and flowers along some of the major roadways in North America. These somber markers will hopefully remind others of the severity of their actions, and thus, help prevent such tragedies.

A first time offender may find themselves facing a misdemeanor charge that carries penalties of suspension of license, possible jail time, and expensive fines. If there’s an injury associated with the first offense, then a person may find themselves facing a felony. A felony conviction not only carries stiffer financial and jail time penalties, but can also result in the loss of voting privileges for the rest of a person’s life. If the accused is under the age of twenty-one they may find themselves without their license for two years in addition to other penalties.

The legal limit of blood alcohol content is.08 percent. For drivers under the age of twenty-one the legal limit doesn’t matter. Even a trace amount of alcohol can lead to a DUI conviction for those under the legal age limit. Repeat offenders find themselves facing even stiffer penalties with higher fines and longer sentences.

Due to these severe penalties, it’s imperative for the accused to retain an experienced DUI lawyer. A skilled DUI attorney can negotiate charges and penalties. It is possible to gain a “hardship license”, but that’s almost impossible to do without a good criminal lawyer.

Prior to contacting a DUI lawyer, there are certain things a person can do to help their case. Always remember The Constitution grants citizens the right to remain silent. Cooperate with the police insofar as participating in a roadside sobriety test, but do not offer any additional information. Do not resist arrest and do not protest if the officer confiscates your license.

Do not do anything that may result in additional charges or make the situation worse. Even if one has not been drinking, let the DUI lawyer handle any misunderstandings. As soon as possible contact a criminal lawyer so that they may begin building your defense. Facing a DUI is horrifying, but those with proper representation do not have to face it alone.

Nick Messe is president of Lead Frog LLC. When you need an experienced Naperville criminal attorneys. They have a successful winning track record in DuPage and Naperville criminal trials ranging from DUI to Murder – http://www.martinandkent.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Nick_Messe

The Criminal Law Handbook – Know Your Rights, Survive the System

February 17, 2010 by Maricopa County Court  
Filed under Criminal Court

By Alain Burrese –

“The Criminal Law Handbook: Know Your Rights, Survive the System” by Attorneys Paul Bergman & Sara J. Berman is an impressive 678 page tome of information all about criminal law. The book sets out to assist you with understanding the confusing rules and procedures involved with criminal offences and to teach you how the system works, why police, lawyers, and judges do what they do, and most importantly, what you can do to limit the harm. I feel it accomplishes that goal very well. Most of the book is written in an understandable question-and-answer format to explain the criminal justice system, both inside and outside the courtroom. It goes from initial police questioning through trials to prison and parole.

One must remember that Nolo focuses on making the law accessible to everyone, and the books published by Nolo do an outstanding job of doing just that. Therefore, this book isn’t a criminal law text book as you would find in law school, but a comprehensive guide for the non-lawyer or layperson. For such a guide, it is very good and includes a lot of information.

The twenty-seven chapters are broken down like this:

Chapter One: Talking to the Police. Chapter provides information on police questioning of people who haven’t been taken into custody and questioning of arrestees.

Chapter Two: Search and Seizure. Some of the topics covered here include: search warrants, plain view doctrine, stop and frisk, searches of cars, and warrantless searches.

Chapter Three: Arrest: When It Happens, What It Means. This chapter covers general arrest principles, arrest warrants, warrantless arrests, use of force when making arrests, and citizens’ arrests.

Chapter Four: Eyewitness Identification: Psychology and Procedures. Topics include eyewitness identification procedures, psychology of eyewitness identification, lineups, showups, photo identification, and motions to suppress identification.

Chapter Five: Booking and Bail: Checking In and Out of Jail. The booking process, arranging for bail, and being released on your own recognizance are covered here.

Chapter Six: From Suspect to Defendant. This chapter focuses on crime and criminal cases and charging, grand juries, and diversion.

Chapter Seven: Criminal Defense Lawyers. Do you need a lawyer, court-appointed attorneys, private defense attorneys, and self-representation are covered in this chapter.

Chapter Eight: Understanding the Attorney-Client Relationship in a Criminal Case. Topics include confidentiality, client-centered decision making, lawyer-client communication, among others.

Chapter Nine: A Walk Through Criminal Court. The courthouse, courtroom, courtroom players, and courtroom behavior are explained.

Chapter Ten: Arraignments. Timing and self-representation at arraignments are looked at here.

Chapter Eleven: Developing the Defense Strategy. Just what the chapter title says, the basics of defense strategy.

Chapter Twelve: Crimespeak: Understanding the Language of Criminal Laws. Basics about things such as murder and manslaughter, sexual violence, burglary, robbery, hate crimes, Patriot Act and more.

Chapter Thirteen: Defensespeak: Common Defenses to Criminal Charges. Topics such as partial defenses, self-defense, alibi, and insanity are covered here among others.

Chapter Fourteen: Discovery: Exchanging Information With the Prosecution. Discovery is an important part of any legal or civil case and this chapter provides the basics for the criminal arena.

Chapter Fifteen: Investigating the Facts. Interviews and witnesses are a couple of the things covered here.

Chapter Sixteen: Preliminary Hearings. What they are, what your rights are, and common strategies of both sides are presented here.

Chapter Seventeen: Fundamental Trial Rights of the Defense. Topics covered include: Due Process, Burden of Proof, Right to Remain Silent, Right to Confront Witnesses, Right to Jury Trial, Right to Counsel, and others.

Chapter Eighteen: Basic Evidence Rules in Criminal Trials. There are procedures that must be followed when presenting evidence and this chapter provides guidelines for doing it right.

Chapter Nineteen: Motions and Their Role in Criminal Cases. Learn what they are and what they are for in this chapter.

Chapter Twenty: Plea Bargains: How Most Criminal Cases End. Basics on plea bargains, the pros and cons, the process, and the strategy of negotiating plea bargains are covered in this chapter.

Chapter Twenty-one: The Trial Process. Good chapter on the various aspects of a trial from choosing a judge or jury to deliberations and verdict.

Chapter Twenty-two: Sentencing: How the Court Punishes Convicted Defendants. The basics of sentencing procedures and options and a bit about the death penalty.

Chapter Twenty-three. Appeals: Seeking Review by a Higher Court. Losing at trial does not necessarily mean it is over. This chapter covers appeals and writs.

Chapter Twenty-four: How the Criminal Justice System Works: A Walk Through Two Drunk Driving Cases. Examples using drunk driving.

Chapter Twenty-five: Juvenile Courts and Procedures. Special chapter explaining the how things work in Juvenile Courts.

Chapter Twenty-six: Prisoners’ Rules. Information covering prisons and prisoners’ rights, legal resources, parole and pardons.

Chapter Twenty-seven. Looking Up the Law. What and where to research, including a glossary.

Again, this book is a large tome of information. It is organized well and has many side-bars and examples. If you have a question regarding criminal law, more than likely this book will have an answer. The authors do point out that the law varies from state to state, and I’d recommend that besides this book, anyone dealing with the criminal system on their own look to the statutes in the jurisdiction they are in to ensure they have the law that is applicable to their case. That’s why I really like that the final chapter provides guidance in this area. The authors also note that the book is not intended as a detailed guide to self-representation. It is a thorough overview of the entire system, but it’s not everything, and that’s because you can’t put everything regarding our complex system in one book.

This is an excellent tour of the criminal justice system and one of the best resources around for the layperson who wants or needs to navigate the complex maze of rules and laws that make up our system. I recommend it highly for anyone who wants to know all about criminal law.

Alain Burrese, J.D. is a performance and personal development expert who teaches how to live, take action, and get things done through the Warrior’s Edge. Alain combines his military, martial art, and Asian experiences with his business, law, and conflict resolution education into a powerful way of living with balance, honor, and integrity. He teaches how to use the Warrior’s Edge to Take Action and Achieve Remarkable Results. Alain is the author of Hard-Won Wisdom From The School Of Hard Knocks, the DVDs Hapkido Hoshinsul, Streetfighting Essentials, Hapkido Cane, the Lock On Joint Locking series, and numerous articles and reviews. You can read more articles, over 100 reviews, and see clips of his DVDs as well as much more at http://www.burrese.com

Article Source:  The Criminal Law Handbook – Know Your Rights, Survive the System

Parents in Prison

October 16, 2009 by Maricopa County Court  
Filed under Going to Jail

By Richard R Blake –

It is estimated that there may be as many as two million children in the United States who have a parent in prisons.  The influence and effect of incarceration of parents on their children cannot be minimized.  The trauma of separation, the stigma of shame, and the economic implications on the remaining family members can be confusing and devastating to the child.

The Family is an institution designed by God.  Today our family structure is being weakened by immorality, divorce, violence, and materialism.  We live in troubled times. God is in the family repair business.  He wants to strengthen family ties and bind families together.

As the church and as individual Christians we need to respond to the need and become more focused on ensuring that these children have a safe, permanent home, one that maintains and promotes their well-being. Churches and prison ministry organizations are targeting families of inmates and ex-inmates with programs to offset the immediate and long-term effect of incarceration on family members.

There are practical steps we can take to bridge the gap between the inmate and their families.  We can visit inmates in prison as they experience loneliness, guilt, and the hopelessness of their situation.  We can respond to the needs of the offender or family by providing aid in particular matters and individual concerns.

We can provide resources and information to these families as well as establishing and maintaining relationships with the parents and their children.  It is critical to establish and communicate an environment of trust in these relationships as well as to break the cycle of crime by changing the hearts and minds of the incarcerated and the family members, including the children.  The message of Christ is more than another community program.

Even hardened criminals can be touched and changed by the power of the gospel.  Returning the ex-offender to the home instead of prison is of extreme importance for these young people.  Recidivism studies reveal that on-going participation in faith based community program s is a critical element in reducing “re-offense.” Discipleship training implemented by mentors is an effective means of restoring inmates into productive and responsible parental roles.

Working as a volunteer in prison ministry will put you in a non supportive secular environment.  Open doors of ministry in the prison are changing.  As leaders of people we must ask, “What can I do to insure that the doors remain open for our lay workers to minister the Gospel?”  Restorative justice, victims rights, restitution, alternatives to incarceration, and prison reform are all issues that need to be addressed with intellectual honesty and spiritual concern.

Christian volunteers visiting in the prison and in homes bring a message of hope to the inmates and their families.  We have the opportunity of evangelism and discipleship.  We must not be distracted from ministering the good news of healing to the broken hearted, deliverance to the bound, release to the oppressed and light to the blind.

For information on service opportunities in your local jail or prison contact the chaplain or inmate services director for ministry opportunities.  Then, get involved. A parent, a child, or both may be counting on your response to that call.

Richard R. Blake, Christian Education Consultant, Book Store Owner

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Richard_R_Blake

How to Find Criminal Court Records

By Darren Welder –

Are you in trouble right now? Do you have a doubt with the person you are dealing recently? Do you suspect that somebody has a criminal record?

Well, when we talk about criminal court records, that means, we are interested to know the summary of the individual’s contacts with law enforcement. That includes all the things happened since the case was filed. However, if you are the person seeking for help on how to find criminal court records, I would like to share you now some tips on how you could do it.

1. Know the person’s complete name, address and basic background. The more information that you have in your hand about that person, the easier you can find his or her criminal court record if there is.

2. You call the office of your state’s State Attorney General. They can tell you the process on how to obtain an Official Criminal History Report. They will tell you about the official FBI’s NCIC (National Crime Information Center.) Here, you can see the actual lists of every single adult being arrested and charged disposition everywhere in the United States. These reports are not free, but you only have to pay a very small charge to the Law enforcement Agency who runs and print the reports for you.

3. Try to do it online. Visit criminalsearches.com, a free service do search criminal records. Every state also has their own databases of criminals on their sites online (usually the database contains only sexual offender records.)

4. In case you cannot find the record you are looking for through online, the only way you can do is to simply visit the court house where the case was filed and request for the criminal record at the court clerk.

5. Find a private investigator in your area who will handle the entire process from the beginning until the end.

You nationwide criminal check using a reputable background check service like [http://www.peoplesearchpedia.com]US Search (to get to [http://www.peoplesearchpedia.com]their site click here) They can do a local and a nationwide criminal search for you, thus saving you a lot of time and some money too. And then won’t ask you for a reason, unlike the police and the court.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Darren_Welder

Criminal Court Records Searches

October 9, 2009 by Maricopa County Court  
Filed under Criminal Court

By Sammy Salamis –

Criminal court records are a great resource if you are concerned over the background of any individual that you may be in contact with. They contain information concerning any convictions a person may have for criminal offenses committed in the past, and can help you to safeguard yourself, your property, money and family.

These records are completely legal for you to access so long as you are not intending to use them for any criminal or harmful purpose, and are made available under the Freedom of Information Act. So, it isOK for you to use this information to protect yourself and your interests, but it wold be a problem if you were intending to use them unfairly to harm someoneelse’s reputation or interests.

However, just because the records are free for the public to access does not mean that they are easy to locate. In fact, they can be rather difficult to track down because they are stored in so many different places! The full details that you need to do a complete search should include all the different sources nationwide, as a person may have lived in a different county or state in the past, and committed crimes there.

One option that many turn to in order to chase up all these different sources of information is private investigators, who are expert in finding this source of information. This is a legitimate option, and is definitely faster than looking for the information yourself. However, it can be very expensive, and for most people is more thorough than needed.

This is why there are a number of websites that offer the information you need in one place. They work by compiling the information from lots of different databases into one place, and cross referencing it so that you can find all the details you need for any one person, taken from all the records in the entire country.

While you may think that such a service would be very expensive to use, there are some sites that are surprisingly affordable. This is because there are so many security conscious customers these days who are willing to use services like these, which drives the prices down.

Click on the link below to see which site I recommend for criminal court records!

Sammy is an expert on Internet search technology – how to find what you are looking for!

Click Here to see which site he especially recommends for criminal record searches

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Sammy_Salamis

Aggravated Assault – The Criminal Court and the Civil Suits

October 8, 2009 by Maricopa County Court  
Filed under Criminal Court

By Frank Schumacher –

When charged of aggravated assault, an individual should take it seriously especially when it is a false accusation. A very serious punishment awaits you in Arizona if you are found guilty. The aggravated assault charge can not only be filed in the criminal court, it can lead to a civil suit as well. To avoid potential civil trial, you need a positive result from your criminal charge. To let yourself off the hook, you need to hire a good defense attorney that knows the ins and outs of an aggravated assault case.

In Arizona, there are three major scenarios where the crime of aggravated assault is most often seen. The first one is assault within the family. It may be between the husband and wife, parent and child, two siblings or some other family relations such as aunts and uncles. The second one is an assault by a person known to the victim. It might be a neighbor, friend, colleague, boss, classmate or teacher. The third one is assault by a stranger. Most common scenes for aggravated assaults happen at home while the rest typically occurs in roads and parking lots.

The definition of aggravated assault in Arizona is the unlawful attack by a person upon another person with the intent of inflicting serious bodily injury. There are broad cases concerning the crime of aggravated assault and the reason may not be what people commonly expect it to be. If you think that guns, sharp knives and baseball bats are the only weapons considered as deadly, you better think again. Even hands, feet, car or a toaster when used against another person can also result to a charge of aggravated assault.

Here are the five most recognized ranges of aggravated assault under the Arizona Revised Statutes 13-1204 (A).

1.    When a person causes another person of serious physical injury.
2.    When a person uses deadly weapon or weapons or other dangerous instrument.
3.    When a person commits the assault after entering other person’s private home with the intention to inflicting serious physical injury.
4.    When a person eighteen years of age or older commits the assault to another person who is fifteen years old or younger.
5.    When a person commits an assault to another person whose job belongs to one of the following: teachers, prosecutors, health care providers, policemen, prison guards and the like.

For those wrongly accused of aggravated assault, a skilled and aggressive lawyer will be the best defense in such situation. The lawyer will have to effectively separate the emotional concerns from the factual and legal issues in order to win the case in favor of the accused. Your lawyer can plead self defense, defense of a third person or even provocation in your case so you can be acquitted in the end. It is important to get acquitted in the criminal court for a larger chance to escape the civil lawsuit.

When you are faced with a [http://www.arizonacriminallaw.info/html/aggravated-assault.html]Phoenix criminal lawsuit or an [http://www.arizonacriminallaw.info/html/aggravated-assault.html]Arizona criminal lawsuit such as this, finding an effective defense lawyer should be your first priority. Ask around from your friends and family if they know one or you can also do your own research over the internet.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Frank_Schumacher

Death Penalty – The Details

October 7, 2009 by Maricopa County Court  
Filed under Criminal Court

By Joseph Devine –

Only used in 38 out of 50 states, the death penalty is one of the forms of capital punishment. Texas does have the death penalty available as a capital punishment, but there are a number of qualifications that you must meet before you can be assigned a capital punishment. Anyone who is up for getting a capital punishment must be at least 17 years of age or older.

Only people that have committed a capital crime can be given the death penalty. A capital felony is a crime that is committed on the highest degree level possible. This includes murder of a police officer, multiple murders, murdering of a child under 6, or murder during a prison escape. This is just a small list of the many people that can and are sentenced to the death penalty on a daily basis. The death penalty can be a very serious conviction and many people need just the right criminal lawyer to take care of it.

Each case is normally looked at on a case by case basis. The judge will usually give you a trial which will either be a bench trial or a jury trial. With a bench trial, the judge will make the decision to whether the person is guilty or not. They judge will also make a ruling to what punishment the person will get. A jury trial, means that the jury will make the decision or guilty or not and the judge will rule on the punishment. You always have the choice to speak with your lawyer and decide what type of trial you want. They each have their positives and negatives that you could understand if you were in a trial for capital punishment.

Appeals normally go through the Court of Appeals, Texas Supreme Court, US Circuit Court of Appeals, and finally reach the US Supreme Court. Each of these courts will make a ruling to whether or not the person is guilty. Once the ruling has been made over the US Supreme Court, the trial is over. The person will then be put on death row and will wait for his sentence to be carried out.

The court system requires that the person have exhausted all types of appeals before the death sentence be carried out. The person will have to have an attorney before anything can ever take place. The court also requires that you have someone representing you before you will go into a trial.

If you are looking for a criminal lawyer to represent you, contact http://www.attorneysandlawyers4you.com for more help.

Joseph Devine

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joseph_Devine

Criminal Defendants on Trial – Under Immediate Arrest

October 7, 2009 by Maricopa County Court  
Filed under Criminal Court

By Ira Still –

The police have a chilling way of ushering a person into the criminal justice system: “You are under arrest!” Through the shock of these words you realize that you better comply with their directions or you might feel the sting of the taser, the bite of the police dog or the wrath of the night stick. Terror, anger and confusion fill the moment. You are on your way to the jail, the first appearance hearing, the bondsman’s interview, the lawyer’s office, the trial court proceedings and the jury trial. You are now inside the criminal justice system until the entire process is concluded.

*What is a warrant or capias?

An arrest could be based upon a warrant. But these comprise only a small percentage of arrest situations. A warrant (or capias) is a document issued by the trial court. It is a demand that the police take you into custody immediately wherever they may find you. Since these previously issued court orders were based upon circumstances that you knew were in the works [like violations of probation, failure to show up for a court hearing, etc.], they shouldn’t be a total surprise. You might blow a stop sign and get pulled over. The police run your driver’s license and a capias appears on the screen. Within a very short time you will be under arrest.

*Could I be arrested without a warrant?

Yes. The vast majority of arrests are made by police officers acting without a warrant. Suppose you are shopping. You walk to the door with packages in hand. When you get out to the parking lot, you’re stopped by a security officer. He looks in your bags and finds the clothes you just bought. He asks, “Where’s the sales slip?” You can’t find it. “Come on back inside so we can straighten this out.” The sales clerk doesn’t remember you at her register. The police are called in. You are now under immediate arrest.

Imagine you are driving your friends around and stop at a store. They go inside. You can’t see what happens but they come running out. They jump in and yell, “Drive, drive! Don’t stop!” You follow their demands and drive off. A high speed chase ends with a swarm of cops standing around your car; guns drawn. They are screaming, “Out the car and on the ground.” Later you learn that one of your friends tried to rob the cash register. When it went bad, he shot a man. You are being charged with felony murder. You are panic stricken and you are also under immediate arrest.

*What if I try to resist the cops?

Let’s address what to do and what not to do when you are being detained. Never try to fight the police. You will get additional charges. Don’t try running away. You will get more charges and rough treatment. This is not a battle between you and the police. This is the police doing what the government has hired them to do. They are under a duty and they will not back down.

Go along peaceably. This will help you now and later it may help your case. As in all of life, humility conquers arrogance.

Don’t try to talk your way out of it. You should only tell the police your name, age, address, and other personal background information. If you don’t give them this identifying information you could get an additional charge known as resisting an officer. But that is where you must stop talking. SAY NO MORE!

*How do I get them to stop all the questions?

Do not talk about the facts or circumstances of the case to anyone. Tell the detectives that you refuse to talk until you have an attorney. That is a key phrase in the law. Under the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution you have both the right to silence and the right to counsel. If you assert the right to silence by saying, “I do not want to say anything,” the police can keep trying to get you to talk. If you begin talking about anything at all, the trial court may rule that you waived your right to silence. Only you can waive your rights, so don’t speak.

If you say over and over, “I want to speak to an attorney,” the law says the police must immediately stop questioning you until your attorney is present. When your attorney arrives, he will instruct the police that you won’t be giving any statements.

*Will the circumstances of the arrest be part of the court case?

The police will definitely testify in court about the arrest. They will tell the jury what you said and what you did. Keep these things in mind:

Police cars are equipped to take videos. Some can audio tape conversations. There are also video cameras in police stations and jails. These may be put into evidence in your court hearing or trial.

WARNING: Prosecutors use audio and video taped jailhouse visit conversations in trial. There is no right to privacy while in custody. Only talk about your case with your attorney.

The police might conduct a “show-up Identification.” This is where the victim is brought to the scene of arrest to see if they can identify you. Be calm and collected. Do what the police instruct you to do.

If your friends are arrested along with you, don’t talk to them about the case either. Don’t communicate with them at all. This could seriously impact your case.

The terrifying experience of being arrested will come to an end. From the initial police stop through the booking process, this might be the worst day of your life. The single most important thing to keep in your mind is don’t talk to anyone except your attorney about the facts of your case.

For more helpful information on success strategies for a person charged with a crime, contact

Ira Still, Esquire

Web: http://www.istilldefendliberty.com

Info Blog: http://istilldefendliberty.blogspot.com

Ira Still has been a criminal defense trial lawyer in Florida for over 30 years. He successfully represents his clients on all crimes and in all courts. Ira has had many, many jury trials and is well known in Miami and Ft. Lauderdale as a very successful trial and appellate lawyer. He has argued death penalty collateral appeals in the Florida Supreme Court and in various District Courts of Appeal. Ira has tried high profile cases such as police shooting a person and persons charged with shooting police; capital murder and capital sexual battery; violent crimes; drug trafficking; and virtually every other criminal charge.

Ira Still is also an author, speaker, teacher, mentor and coach.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Ira_Still

Types Of Trials

October 6, 2009 by Maricopa County Court  
Filed under Criminal Court

By Joseph Devine –

When you have been arrested for a criminal case, you begin to understand that you are in a whole new world. The police arrest you and then you go in for a hearing to await some type of bail. Once you have been to your assigned bail hearing you will either be released or held in jail until the day of your trial. Before you go to your trial, you might want to know what type of trials there are.

There are two types of trials that are used in criminal courts. The first type of a trial is what is called a bench trial. This type of trial is when there is no jury. A bench trial basically means that the judge will hear all of the court case and then solely the judge will decide on what they think the verdict should be. The judge will also be the one to sentence to you to what ever the punishment might be. This can be a helpful type of trial if you are worried about what a whole jury of people might think. If you think that they will rule negatively on your case then you might ask your Criminal lawyer in Austin to help you to get a bench trial instead of a trial by jury.

The next type of trial is what is called a jury trial. This type of trial is for the most part self explanatory. This trial means that there will be a jury that goes through the entire trial process. At the end of the trial, they will get together and deliberate to decide on what the verdict will be. There are usually 12 people in a jury and to get an official verdict from the jury, you must have at least a 75% vote from the jury. This may be a positive aspect because of the number of people that are in the jury. If you are worried about your vote, you might decide on a jury trial because you will have more people that might side with your views. Some people choose to have a jury trial because they might they have more of an option for people to feel for the person that they are trying to prosecute. This can also be a negative aspect because people might not side with you and this might end your case badly.

For more information, contact the Austin Criminal Lawyers of Morales and Navarrete at 866-812-4596.

Joseph Devine

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joseph_Devine

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline

There may be a bug in FeedWordPress. Please contact the author and paste the following information into your e-mail:

Triggered at line # 603 FeedWordPress version: 2009.1112 MagpieRSS version: WordPress 2.9.2 default. WordPress version: 2.9.2 PHP version: 5.2.13 SyndicatedPost::insert_new::_wp_id: array(3) { ["$this->_wp_id"]=> int(0) ["$dbpost"]=> array(17) { ["post_title"]=> string(107) "What happens during a divorce if a community home is about to be foreclosed or has already been foreclosed?" ["post_content"]=> string(6694) "With Arizona’s (and the rest of the country’s) current depressed real estate market, many people are facing foreclosures. A few things to keep in mind:<br /><br />1. The foreclosure is going to continue on in most divorce circumstances unless the home’s mortgage is brought current, along with the reasonable costs associated with the foreclosure, such as attorney fees.<br /><br />2. Arizona has an anti-deficiency statute that is going to apply in the majority of cases involving standard mortgages. Thus, Arizona law offers protection to homeowners whose home has been foreclosed. This statute, A.R.S. §33-729, states as follows:<br /><br />33-729. Purchase money mortgage; limitation on liability<br /><br />A. Except as provided in subsection B, if a mortgage is given to secure the payment of the balance of the purchase price, or to secure a loan to pay all or part of the purchase price, of a parcel of real property of two and one-half acres or less which is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling, the lien of judgment in an action to foreclose such mortgage shall not extend to any other property of the judgment debtor, nor may general execution be issued against the judgment debtor to enforce such judgment, and if the proceeds of the mortgaged real property sold under special execution are insufficient to satisfy the judgment, the judgment may not otherwise be satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary.<br />B. The balance due on a mortgage foreclosure judgment after sale of the mortgaged property shall constitute a lien against other property of the judgment debtor, general execution may be issued thereon, and the judgment may be otherwise satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, if the court determines, after sale upon special execution and upon written application and such notice to the judgment debtor as the court may require, that the sale price was less than the amount of the judgment because of diminution in the value of such real property while such property was in the ownership, possession, or control of the judgment debtor because of voluntary waste committed or permitted by the judgment debtor, not to exceed the amount of diminution in value as determined by such court.<br /><br />Interpreted, this statute means that for the average homeowner, a lender cannot seek to recover from the homeowner any shortages when the foreclosing bank sells the house for less than the outstanding mortgage amount. The second part of the statute is interesting, but reasonable, in that it references voluntary waste –if, for example, a homeowner angry at the foreclosing bank wrecks his/her home intentionally, the homeowner may be responsible for the effect the damage has on the home’s value.<br /><br />So what options does a homeowner have in a divorce situation or otherwise? Here are a few:<br /><br />1. Let the bank foreclose on the property. The foreclosure in most circumstances will absolve the homeowner from most or all further financial responsibilities but will not reflect well on the homeowner’s credit report. Consult an attorney regarding your specific situation prior to assuming that there will be minor or no financial repercussions as there are exceptions to the anti-deficiency provisions of A.R.S. § 33-729. If there are negative financial repercussions, community property principles apply and if a divorce situation exists, then the parties or court will decide the parties responsibility for the financial obligations. Of course, any divorce rulings define the rights and obligations as between the parties only and are not binding on third party creditors, such as mortgage holders, meaning that banks are free to go after both parties if community property/obligations are involved.<br /><br />2. Bring the mortgage current and retain the property. The homeowner will have to pay additional fees/costs to do so but then will continue to own the property.<br /><br />3. Consider a “short sale” which is an effort to sell the property at a reduced price so that the bank will not have to bother with the time and expense of foreclosure. The bank then accepts the buy-out, basically, with less negative effects on the homeowner. It’s more complex than that but that’s the gist. I recommend that a lawyer guide both the seller and buyer of anyone participating in a short sale situation; as well, a good real estate agent familiar with short sales is recommended. Of course, when the real estate market is better than it is at the time of this writing, selling a house and paying off the mortgage in full is easier than it is now. In addition, some lenders will not agree to short sales because they believe it sets a bad precedent that too many other borrowers will attempt to use. Another piece of the short sale puzzle is the possibility the IRS will consider any amounts forgiven as income (consult an attorney regarding the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 for specifics on that new law and related consequences).<br /><br />Real estate issues are complex and real property is often the largest asset involved in a divorce. It’s a good idea to consult with a competent attorney prior to making decisions about real estate!<br /><br />Wilcox Legal Group, P.C.<br />Carrie M. Wilcox, Esq.<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <u><em><strong><span style=\"font-size:130%;\">www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></strong></em></u><br /><br /><span style=\"font-size:85%;color:#990000;\"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span><div class=\"blogger-post-footer\"><img width=\'1\' height=\'1\' src=\'https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-2313641363621295872?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com\' alt=\'\' /></div>" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(6694) "With Arizona’s (and the rest of the country’s) current depressed real estate market, many people are facing foreclosures. A few things to keep in mind:<br /><br />1. The foreclosure is going to continue on in most divorce circumstances unless the home’s mortgage is brought current, along with the reasonable costs associated with the foreclosure, such as attorney fees.<br /><br />2. Arizona has an anti-deficiency statute that is going to apply in the majority of cases involving standard mortgages. Thus, Arizona law offers protection to homeowners whose home has been foreclosed. This statute, A.R.S. §33-729, states as follows:<br /><br />33-729. Purchase money mortgage; limitation on liability<br /><br />A. Except as provided in subsection B, if a mortgage is given to secure the payment of the balance of the purchase price, or to secure a loan to pay all or part of the purchase price, of a parcel of real property of two and one-half acres or less which is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling, the lien of judgment in an action to foreclose such mortgage shall not extend to any other property of the judgment debtor, nor may general execution be issued against the judgment debtor to enforce such judgment, and if the proceeds of the mortgaged real property sold under special execution are insufficient to satisfy the judgment, the judgment may not otherwise be satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary.<br />B. The balance due on a mortgage foreclosure judgment after sale of the mortgaged property shall constitute a lien against other property of the judgment debtor, general execution may be issued thereon, and the judgment may be otherwise satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, if the court determines, after sale upon special execution and upon written application and such notice to the judgment debtor as the court may require, that the sale price was less than the amount of the judgment because of diminution in the value of such real property while such property was in the ownership, possession, or control of the judgment debtor because of voluntary waste committed or permitted by the judgment debtor, not to exceed the amount of diminution in value as determined by such court.<br /><br />Interpreted, this statute means that for the average homeowner, a lender cannot seek to recover from the homeowner any shortages when the foreclosing bank sells the house for less than the outstanding mortgage amount. The second part of the statute is interesting, but reasonable, in that it references voluntary waste –if, for example, a homeowner angry at the foreclosing bank wrecks his/her home intentionally, the homeowner may be responsible for the effect the damage has on the home’s value.<br /><br />So what options does a homeowner have in a divorce situation or otherwise? Here are a few:<br /><br />1. Let the bank foreclose on the property. The foreclosure in most circumstances will absolve the homeowner from most or all further financial responsibilities but will not reflect well on the homeowner’s credit report. Consult an attorney regarding your specific situation prior to assuming that there will be minor or no financial repercussions as there are exceptions to the anti-deficiency provisions of A.R.S. § 33-729. If there are negative financial repercussions, community property principles apply and if a divorce situation exists, then the parties or court will decide the parties responsibility for the financial obligations. Of course, any divorce rulings define the rights and obligations as between the parties only and are not binding on third party creditors, such as mortgage holders, meaning that banks are free to go after both parties if community property/obligations are involved.<br /><br />2. Bring the mortgage current and retain the property. The homeowner will have to pay additional fees/costs to do so but then will continue to own the property.<br /><br />3. Consider a “short sale” which is an effort to sell the property at a reduced price so that the bank will not have to bother with the time and expense of foreclosure. The bank then accepts the buy-out, basically, with less negative effects on the homeowner. It’s more complex than that but that’s the gist. I recommend that a lawyer guide both the seller and buyer of anyone participating in a short sale situation; as well, a good real estate agent familiar with short sales is recommended. Of course, when the real estate market is better than it is at the time of this writing, selling a house and paying off the mortgage in full is easier than it is now. In addition, some lenders will not agree to short sales because they believe it sets a bad precedent that too many other borrowers will attempt to use. Another piece of the short sale puzzle is the possibility the IRS will consider any amounts forgiven as income (consult an attorney regarding the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 for specifics on that new law and related consequences).<br /><br />Real estate issues are complex and real property is often the largest asset involved in a divorce. It’s a good idea to consult with a competent attorney prior to making decisions about real estate!<br /><br />Wilcox Legal Group, P.C.<br />Carrie M. Wilcox, Esq.<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <u><em><strong><span style=\"font-size:130%;\">www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></strong></em></u><br /><br /><span style=\"font-size:85%;color:#990000;\"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span><div class=\"blogger-post-footer\"><img width=\'1\' height=\'1\' src=\'https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-2313641363621295872?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com\' alt=\'\' /></div>" ["epoch"]=> array(3) { ["issued"]=> int(1204184340) ["created"]=> NULL ["modified"]=> int(1204184340) } ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2008-02-28 07:39:00" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2008-02-28 07:39:00" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2008-02-28 07:39:00" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2008-02-28 07:39:00" ["post_status"]=> string(7) "publish" ["comment_status"]=> string(6) "closed" ["ping_status"]=> string(6) "closed" ["guid"]=> string(58) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-2313641363621295872" ["meta"]=> array(6) { ["syndication_source"]=> string(28) "Arizona Divorce & Family Law" ["syndication_source_uri"]=> string(37) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/" ["syndication_feed"]=> string(64) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss" ["syndication_feed_id"]=> string(2) "13" ["syndication_permalink"]=> string(80) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2008/02/what-happens-during-divorce-if.html" ["syndication_item_hash"]=> string(32) "25eed891b9124857f117e5a69c951920" } ["tags_input"]=> array(8) { [0]=> string(14) "arizona courts" [1]=> string(13) "arizona legal" [2]=> string(12) "arizona laws" [3]=> string(16) "arizona statutes" [4]=> string(24) "maricopa county attorney" [5]=> string(21) "maricopa family court" [6]=> string(15) "az family court" [7]=> string(16) "az child support" } ["post_author"]=> int(104695) ["post_category"]=> array(1) { [0]=> int(25) } ["post_pingback"]=> bool(false) } ["$this"]=> object(SyndicatedPost)#306 (10) { ["item"]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(58) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-2313641363621295872" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:39:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2008-02-28T01:11:55.916-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(107) "What happens during a divorce if a community home is about to be foreclosed or has already been foreclosed?" ["description"]=> string(6680) "With Arizona’s (and the rest of the country’s) current depressed real estate market, many people are facing foreclosures. A few things to keep in mind:<br /><br />1. The foreclosure is going to continue on in most divorce circumstances unless the home’s mortgage is brought current, along with the reasonable costs associated with the foreclosure, such as attorney fees.<br /><br />2. Arizona has an anti-deficiency statute that is going to apply in the majority of cases involving standard mortgages. Thus, Arizona law offers protection to homeowners whose home has been foreclosed. This statute, A.R.S. §33-729, states as follows:<br /><br />33-729. Purchase money mortgage; limitation on liability<br /><br />A. Except as provided in subsection B, if a mortgage is given to secure the payment of the balance of the purchase price, or to secure a loan to pay all or part of the purchase price, of a parcel of real property of two and one-half acres or less which is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling, the lien of judgment in an action to foreclose such mortgage shall not extend to any other property of the judgment debtor, nor may general execution be issued against the judgment debtor to enforce such judgment, and if the proceeds of the mortgaged real property sold under special execution are insufficient to satisfy the judgment, the judgment may not otherwise be satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary.<br />B. The balance due on a mortgage foreclosure judgment after sale of the mortgaged property shall constitute a lien against other property of the judgment debtor, general execution may be issued thereon, and the judgment may be otherwise satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, if the court determines, after sale upon special execution and upon written application and such notice to the judgment debtor as the court may require, that the sale price was less than the amount of the judgment because of diminution in the value of such real property while such property was in the ownership, possession, or control of the judgment debtor because of voluntary waste committed or permitted by the judgment debtor, not to exceed the amount of diminution in value as determined by such court.<br /><br />Interpreted, this statute means that for the average homeowner, a lender cannot seek to recover from the homeowner any shortages when the foreclosing bank sells the house for less than the outstanding mortgage amount. The second part of the statute is interesting, but reasonable, in that it references voluntary waste –if, for example, a homeowner angry at the foreclosing bank wrecks his/her home intentionally, the homeowner may be responsible for the effect the damage has on the home’s value.<br /><br />So what options does a homeowner have in a divorce situation or otherwise? Here are a few:<br /><br />1. Let the bank foreclose on the property. The foreclosure in most circumstances will absolve the homeowner from most or all further financial responsibilities but will not reflect well on the homeowner’s credit report. Consult an attorney regarding your specific situation prior to assuming that there will be minor or no financial repercussions as there are exceptions to the anti-deficiency provisions of A.R.S. § 33-729. If there are negative financial repercussions, community property principles apply and if a divorce situation exists, then the parties or court will decide the parties responsibility for the financial obligations. Of course, any divorce rulings define the rights and obligations as between the parties only and are not binding on third party creditors, such as mortgage holders, meaning that banks are free to go after both parties if community property/obligations are involved.<br /><br />2. Bring the mortgage current and retain the property. The homeowner will have to pay additional fees/costs to do so but then will continue to own the property.<br /><br />3. Consider a “short sale” which is an effort to sell the property at a reduced price so that the bank will not have to bother with the time and expense of foreclosure. The bank then accepts the buy-out, basically, with less negative effects on the homeowner. It’s more complex than that but that’s the gist. I recommend that a lawyer guide both the seller and buyer of anyone participating in a short sale situation; as well, a good real estate agent familiar with short sales is recommended. Of course, when the real estate market is better than it is at the time of this writing, selling a house and paying off the mortgage in full is easier than it is now. In addition, some lenders will not agree to short sales because they believe it sets a bad precedent that too many other borrowers will attempt to use. Another piece of the short sale puzzle is the possibility the IRS will consider any amounts forgiven as income (consult an attorney regarding the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 for specifics on that new law and related consequences).<br /><br />Real estate issues are complex and real property is often the largest asset involved in a divorce. It’s a good idea to consult with a competent attorney prior to making decisions about real estate!<br /><br />Wilcox Legal Group, P.C.<br />Carrie M. Wilcox, Esq.<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <u><em><strong><span style="font-size:130%;">www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></strong></em></u><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-2313641363621295872?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(80) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2008/02/what-happens-during-divorce-if.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(6680) "With Arizona’s (and the rest of the country’s) current depressed real estate market, many people are facing foreclosures. A few things to keep in mind:<br /><br />1. The foreclosure is going to continue on in most divorce circumstances unless the home’s mortgage is brought current, along with the reasonable costs associated with the foreclosure, such as attorney fees.<br /><br />2. Arizona has an anti-deficiency statute that is going to apply in the majority of cases involving standard mortgages. Thus, Arizona law offers protection to homeowners whose home has been foreclosed. This statute, A.R.S. §33-729, states as follows:<br /><br />33-729. Purchase money mortgage; limitation on liability<br /><br />A. Except as provided in subsection B, if a mortgage is given to secure the payment of the balance of the purchase price, or to secure a loan to pay all or part of the purchase price, of a parcel of real property of two and one-half acres or less which is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling, the lien of judgment in an action to foreclose such mortgage shall not extend to any other property of the judgment debtor, nor may general execution be issued against the judgment debtor to enforce such judgment, and if the proceeds of the mortgaged real property sold under special execution are insufficient to satisfy the judgment, the judgment may not otherwise be satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary.<br />B. The balance due on a mortgage foreclosure judgment after sale of the mortgaged property shall constitute a lien against other property of the judgment debtor, general execution may be issued thereon, and the judgment may be otherwise satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, if the court determines, after sale upon special execution and upon written application and such notice to the judgment debtor as the court may require, that the sale price was less than the amount of the judgment because of diminution in the value of such real property while such property was in the ownership, possession, or control of the judgment debtor because of voluntary waste committed or permitted by the judgment debtor, not to exceed the amount of diminution in value as determined by such court.<br /><br />Interpreted, this statute means that for the average homeowner, a lender cannot seek to recover from the homeowner any shortages when the foreclosing bank sells the house for less than the outstanding mortgage amount. The second part of the statute is interesting, but reasonable, in that it references voluntary waste –if, for example, a homeowner angry at the foreclosing bank wrecks his/her home intentionally, the homeowner may be responsible for the effect the damage has on the home’s value.<br /><br />So what options does a homeowner have in a divorce situation or otherwise? Here are a few:<br /><br />1. Let the bank foreclose on the property. The foreclosure in most circumstances will absolve the homeowner from most or all further financial responsibilities but will not reflect well on the homeowner’s credit report. Consult an attorney regarding your specific situation prior to assuming that there will be minor or no financial repercussions as there are exceptions to the anti-deficiency provisions of A.R.S. § 33-729. If there are negative financial repercussions, community property principles apply and if a divorce situation exists, then the parties or court will decide the parties responsibility for the financial obligations. Of course, any divorce rulings define the rights and obligations as between the parties only and are not binding on third party creditors, such as mortgage holders, meaning that banks are free to go after both parties if community property/obligations are involved.<br /><br />2. Bring the mortgage current and retain the property. The homeowner will have to pay additional fees/costs to do so but then will continue to own the property.<br /><br />3. Consider a “short sale” which is an effort to sell the property at a reduced price so that the bank will not have to bother with the time and expense of foreclosure. The bank then accepts the buy-out, basically, with less negative effects on the homeowner. It’s more complex than that but that’s the gist. I recommend that a lawyer guide both the seller and buyer of anyone participating in a short sale situation; as well, a good real estate agent familiar with short sales is recommended. Of course, when the real estate market is better than it is at the time of this writing, selling a house and paying off the mortgage in full is easier than it is now. In addition, some lenders will not agree to short sales because they believe it sets a bad precedent that too many other borrowers will attempt to use. Another piece of the short sale puzzle is the possibility the IRS will consider any amounts forgiven as income (consult an attorney regarding the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 for specifics on that new law and related consequences).<br /><br />Real estate issues are complex and real property is often the largest asset involved in a divorce. It’s a good idea to consult with a competent attorney prior to making decisions about real estate!<br /><br />Wilcox Legal Group, P.C.<br />Carrie M. Wilcox, Esq.<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <u><em><strong><span style="font-size:130%;">www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></strong></em></u><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-2313641363621295872?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } ["link"]=> object(SyndicatedLink)#334 (4) { ["id"]=> string(2) "13" ["link"]=> object(stdClass)#312 (22) { ["link_id"]=> string(2) "13" ["link_url"]=> string(37) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/" ["link_name"]=> string(28) "Arizona Divorce & Family Law" ["link_image"]=> string(0) "" ["link_target"]=> string(0) "" ["link_category"]=> string(1) "0" ["link_description"]=> string(255) "This blog is created by Carrie Wilcox* of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C. to provide general information that may be helpful to those interested in divorce and family law issues. If you need specific information related to your situation, I strongly advise you " ["link_visible"]=> string(1) "Y" ["link_owner"]=> string(1) "1" ["link_rating"]=> string(1) "0" ["link_updated"]=> string(19) "0000-00-00 00:00:00" ["link_rel"]=> string(0) "" ["link_notes"]=> string(4231) "feed/atom/id#: 1 feed/atom/id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767 feed/lastbuilddate#: 1 feed/lastbuilddate: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:34:07 +0000 feed/title#: 1 feed/title: Arizona Divorce & Family Law feed/description#: 1 feed/description: This blog is created by Carrie Wilcox* of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C. to provide general information that may be helpful to those interested in divorce and family law issues. If you need specific information related to your situation, I strongly advise you to contact a lawyer in person. \n\nPlease feel free to notify me of topics that may be of interest so that I can address them.\n\n* Ms. Wilcox is licensed to practice in the state and federal courts of Arizona. feed/link#: 1 feed/link: http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/ feed/managingeditor#: 1 feed/managingeditor: noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer) feed/generator#: 1 feed/generator: Blogger feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//totalresults#: 1 feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//totalresults: 40 feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//startindex#: 1 feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//startindex: 1 feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//itemsperpage#: 1 feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//itemsperpage: 25 feed/tagline#: 1 feed/tagline: This blog is created by Carrie Wilcox* of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C. to provide general information that may be helpful to those interested in divorce and family law issues. If you need specific information related to your situation, I strongly advise you to contact a lawyer in person. \n\nPlease feel free to notify me of topics that may be of interest so that I can address them.\n\n* Ms. Wilcox is licensed to practice in the state and federal courts of Arizona. feed/subtitle#: 1 feed/subtitle: This blog is created by Carrie Wilcox* of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C. to provide general information that may be helpful to those interested in divorce and family law issues. If you need specific information related to your situation, I strongly advise you to contact a lawyer in person. \n\nPlease feel free to notify me of topics that may be of interest so that I can address them.\n\n* Ms. Wilcox is licensed to practice in the state and federal courts of Arizona. feed/id: http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss update/last: 1284111515 update/ttl: 71 update/timed: automatically update/hold: scheduled update/unfinished: no update/processed: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-2313641363621295872\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-116758520031328512\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-116036955627739260\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-115168874242592878\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-113407767339059184\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-113157576507713839\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112909552536467826\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112901278081040613\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112788640283258362\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112613717515225271\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112319536291110368\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112172347651625729\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112049300336456297\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111955298467920353\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111842849295940285\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111842785860296875\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111789606646378821\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111789602037748872\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111644261706682881\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111639474173268493\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111436490598039037\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111398385668239775\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111298692792801840\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111298604624868649\ntag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111121257986650616 hardcode name: no hardcode description: no hardcode url: no cats: {#25} tags: maricopa family court\naz family court\naz child support map authors: name\ntrent wilcox, arizona lawyer\n64 feed/opensearch/totalresults: 40 feed/opensearch/startindex: 1 feed/opensearch/itemsperpage: 25 " ["link_rss"]=> string(64) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss" ["object_id"]=> string(2) "13" ["term_taxonomy_id"]=> string(3) "236" ["term_order"]=> string(1) "0" ["term_id"]=> string(3) "217" ["taxonomy"]=> string(13) "link_category" ["description"]=> string(0) "" ["parent"]=> string(1) "0" ["count"]=> string(2) "22" } ["settings"]=> array(43) { ["feed/atom/id#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/atom/id"]=> string(33) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767" ["feed/lastbuilddate#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/lastbuilddate"]=> string(31) "Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:34:07 +0000" ["feed/title#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/title"]=> string(28) "Arizona Divorce & Family Law" ["feed/description#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/description"]=> string(462) "This blog is created by Carrie Wilcox* of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C. to provide general information that may be helpful to those interested in divorce and family law issues. If you need specific information related to your situation, I strongly advise you to contact a lawyer in person. Please feel free to notify me of topics that may be of interest so that I can address them. * Ms. Wilcox is licensed to practice in the state and federal courts of Arizona." ["feed/link#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/link"]=> string(37) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/" ["feed/managingeditor#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/managingeditor"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["feed/generator#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/generator"]=> string(7) "Blogger" ["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//totalresults#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//totalresults"]=> string(2) "40" ["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//startindex#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//startindex"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//itemsperpage#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0//itemsperpage"]=> string(2) "25" ["feed/tagline#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/tagline"]=> string(462) "This blog is created by Carrie Wilcox* of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C. to provide general information that may be helpful to those interested in divorce and family law issues. If you need specific information related to your situation, I strongly advise you to contact a lawyer in person. Please feel free to notify me of topics that may be of interest so that I can address them. * Ms. Wilcox is licensed to practice in the state and federal courts of Arizona." ["feed/subtitle#"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/subtitle"]=> string(462) "This blog is created by Carrie Wilcox* of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C. to provide general information that may be helpful to those interested in divorce and family law issues. If you need specific information related to your situation, I strongly advise you to contact a lawyer in person. Please feel free to notify me of topics that may be of interest so that I can address them. * Ms. Wilcox is licensed to practice in the state and federal courts of Arizona." ["feed/id"]=> string(64) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss" ["update/last"]=> int(1284116027) ["update/ttl"]=> int(69) ["update/timed"]=> string(13) "automatically" ["update/hold"]=> string(9) "scheduled" ["update/unfinished"]=> string(3) "yes" ["update/processed"]=> string(1450) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-2313641363621295872 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-116758520031328512 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-116036955627739260 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-115168874242592878 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-113407767339059184 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-113157576507713839 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112909552536467826 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112901278081040613 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112788640283258362 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112613717515225271 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112319536291110368 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112172347651625729 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112049300336456297 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111955298467920353 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111842849295940285 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111842785860296875 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111789606646378821 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111789602037748872 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111644261706682881 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111639474173268493 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111436490598039037 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111398385668239775 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111298692792801840 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111298604624868649 tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111121257986650616" ["hardcode name"]=> string(2) "no" ["hardcode description"]=> string(2) "no" ["hardcode url"]=> string(2) "no" ["cats"]=> array(1) { [0]=> string(5) "{#25}" } ["tags"]=> array(3) { [0]=> string(21) "maricopa family court" [1]=> string(15) "az family court" [2]=> string(16) "az child support" } ["map authors"]=> array(1) { ["name"]=> array(1) { ["trent wilcox, arizona lawyer"]=> int(104695) } } ["feed/opensearch/totalresults"]=> string(2) "40" ["feed/opensearch/startindex"]=> string(1) "1" ["feed/opensearch/itemsperpage"]=> string(2) "25" ["link/uri"]=> string(64) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss" ["link/name"]=> string(28) "Arizona Divorce & Family Law" ["link/id"]=> string(2) "13" } ["magpie"]=> object(MagpieRSS)#307 (17) { ["parser"]=> resource(117) of type (Unknown) ["current_item"]=> array(0) { } ["items"]=> array(25) { [0]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(58) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-2313641363621295872" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:39:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2008-02-28T01:11:55.916-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(107) "What happens during a divorce if a community home is about to be foreclosed or has already been foreclosed?" ["description"]=> string(6680) "With Arizona’s (and the rest of the country’s) current depressed real estate market, many people are facing foreclosures. A few things to keep in mind:<br /><br />1. The foreclosure is going to continue on in most divorce circumstances unless the home’s mortgage is brought current, along with the reasonable costs associated with the foreclosure, such as attorney fees.<br /><br />2. Arizona has an anti-deficiency statute that is going to apply in the majority of cases involving standard mortgages. Thus, Arizona law offers protection to homeowners whose home has been foreclosed. This statute, A.R.S. §33-729, states as follows:<br /><br />33-729. Purchase money mortgage; limitation on liability<br /><br />A. Except as provided in subsection B, if a mortgage is given to secure the payment of the balance of the purchase price, or to secure a loan to pay all or part of the purchase price, of a parcel of real property of two and one-half acres or less which is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling, the lien of judgment in an action to foreclose such mortgage shall not extend to any other property of the judgment debtor, nor may general execution be issued against the judgment debtor to enforce such judgment, and if the proceeds of the mortgaged real property sold under special execution are insufficient to satisfy the judgment, the judgment may not otherwise be satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary.<br />B. The balance due on a mortgage foreclosure judgment after sale of the mortgaged property shall constitute a lien against other property of the judgment debtor, general execution may be issued thereon, and the judgment may be otherwise satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, if the court determines, after sale upon special execution and upon written application and such notice to the judgment debtor as the court may require, that the sale price was less than the amount of the judgment because of diminution in the value of such real property while such property was in the ownership, possession, or control of the judgment debtor because of voluntary waste committed or permitted by the judgment debtor, not to exceed the amount of diminution in value as determined by such court.<br /><br />Interpreted, this statute means that for the average homeowner, a lender cannot seek to recover from the homeowner any shortages when the foreclosing bank sells the house for less than the outstanding mortgage amount. The second part of the statute is interesting, but reasonable, in that it references voluntary waste –if, for example, a homeowner angry at the foreclosing bank wrecks his/her home intentionally, the homeowner may be responsible for the effect the damage has on the home’s value.<br /><br />So what options does a homeowner have in a divorce situation or otherwise? Here are a few:<br /><br />1. Let the bank foreclose on the property. The foreclosure in most circumstances will absolve the homeowner from most or all further financial responsibilities but will not reflect well on the homeowner’s credit report. Consult an attorney regarding your specific situation prior to assuming that there will be minor or no financial repercussions as there are exceptions to the anti-deficiency provisions of A.R.S. § 33-729. If there are negative financial repercussions, community property principles apply and if a divorce situation exists, then the parties or court will decide the parties responsibility for the financial obligations. Of course, any divorce rulings define the rights and obligations as between the parties only and are not binding on third party creditors, such as mortgage holders, meaning that banks are free to go after both parties if community property/obligations are involved.<br /><br />2. Bring the mortgage current and retain the property. The homeowner will have to pay additional fees/costs to do so but then will continue to own the property.<br /><br />3. Consider a “short sale” which is an effort to sell the property at a reduced price so that the bank will not have to bother with the time and expense of foreclosure. The bank then accepts the buy-out, basically, with less negative effects on the homeowner. It’s more complex than that but that’s the gist. I recommend that a lawyer guide both the seller and buyer of anyone participating in a short sale situation; as well, a good real estate agent familiar with short sales is recommended. Of course, when the real estate market is better than it is at the time of this writing, selling a house and paying off the mortgage in full is easier than it is now. In addition, some lenders will not agree to short sales because they believe it sets a bad precedent that too many other borrowers will attempt to use. Another piece of the short sale puzzle is the possibility the IRS will consider any amounts forgiven as income (consult an attorney regarding the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 for specifics on that new law and related consequences).<br /><br />Real estate issues are complex and real property is often the largest asset involved in a divorce. It’s a good idea to consult with a competent attorney prior to making decisions about real estate!<br /><br />Wilcox Legal Group, P.C.<br />Carrie M. Wilcox, Esq.<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <u><em><strong><span style="font-size:130%;">www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></strong></em></u><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-2313641363621295872?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(80) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2008/02/what-happens-during-divorce-if.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(6680) "With Arizona’s (and the rest of the country’s) current depressed real estate market, many people are facing foreclosures. A few things to keep in mind:<br /><br />1. The foreclosure is going to continue on in most divorce circumstances unless the home’s mortgage is brought current, along with the reasonable costs associated with the foreclosure, such as attorney fees.<br /><br />2. Arizona has an anti-deficiency statute that is going to apply in the majority of cases involving standard mortgages. Thus, Arizona law offers protection to homeowners whose home has been foreclosed. This statute, A.R.S. §33-729, states as follows:<br /><br />33-729. Purchase money mortgage; limitation on liability<br /><br />A. Except as provided in subsection B, if a mortgage is given to secure the payment of the balance of the purchase price, or to secure a loan to pay all or part of the purchase price, of a parcel of real property of two and one-half acres or less which is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling, the lien of judgment in an action to foreclose such mortgage shall not extend to any other property of the judgment debtor, nor may general execution be issued against the judgment debtor to enforce such judgment, and if the proceeds of the mortgaged real property sold under special execution are insufficient to satisfy the judgment, the judgment may not otherwise be satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary.<br />B. The balance due on a mortgage foreclosure judgment after sale of the mortgaged property shall constitute a lien against other property of the judgment debtor, general execution may be issued thereon, and the judgment may be otherwise satisfied out of other property of the judgment debtor, if the court determines, after sale upon special execution and upon written application and such notice to the judgment debtor as the court may require, that the sale price was less than the amount of the judgment because of diminution in the value of such real property while such property was in the ownership, possession, or control of the judgment debtor because of voluntary waste committed or permitted by the judgment debtor, not to exceed the amount of diminution in value as determined by such court.<br /><br />Interpreted, this statute means that for the average homeowner, a lender cannot seek to recover from the homeowner any shortages when the foreclosing bank sells the house for less than the outstanding mortgage amount. The second part of the statute is interesting, but reasonable, in that it references voluntary waste –if, for example, a homeowner angry at the foreclosing bank wrecks his/her home intentionally, the homeowner may be responsible for the effect the damage has on the home’s value.<br /><br />So what options does a homeowner have in a divorce situation or otherwise? Here are a few:<br /><br />1. Let the bank foreclose on the property. The foreclosure in most circumstances will absolve the homeowner from most or all further financial responsibilities but will not reflect well on the homeowner’s credit report. Consult an attorney regarding your specific situation prior to assuming that there will be minor or no financial repercussions as there are exceptions to the anti-deficiency provisions of A.R.S. § 33-729. If there are negative financial repercussions, community property principles apply and if a divorce situation exists, then the parties or court will decide the parties responsibility for the financial obligations. Of course, any divorce rulings define the rights and obligations as between the parties only and are not binding on third party creditors, such as mortgage holders, meaning that banks are free to go after both parties if community property/obligations are involved.<br /><br />2. Bring the mortgage current and retain the property. The homeowner will have to pay additional fees/costs to do so but then will continue to own the property.<br /><br />3. Consider a “short sale” which is an effort to sell the property at a reduced price so that the bank will not have to bother with the time and expense of foreclosure. The bank then accepts the buy-out, basically, with less negative effects on the homeowner. It’s more complex than that but that’s the gist. I recommend that a lawyer guide both the seller and buyer of anyone participating in a short sale situation; as well, a good real estate agent familiar with short sales is recommended. Of course, when the real estate market is better than it is at the time of this writing, selling a house and paying off the mortgage in full is easier than it is now. In addition, some lenders will not agree to short sales because they believe it sets a bad precedent that too many other borrowers will attempt to use. Another piece of the short sale puzzle is the possibility the IRS will consider any amounts forgiven as income (consult an attorney regarding the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 for specifics on that new law and related consequences).<br /><br />Real estate issues are complex and real property is often the largest asset involved in a divorce. It’s a good idea to consult with a competent attorney prior to making decisions about real estate!<br /><br />Wilcox Legal Group, P.C.<br />Carrie M. Wilcox, Esq.<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <u><em><strong><span style="font-size:130%;">www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></strong></em></u><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-2313641363621295872?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [1]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-116758520031328512" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:12:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2006-12-31T10:30:13.646-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(82) "Court Rules on Statute of Limitations issue Under Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure" ["description"]=> string(4652) "<div align="center">By Carrie Wilcox, Esq.</div><br />The Arizona Supreme Court recently interpreted Rule 15(c) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. In so interpreting, the Supreme Court intended to end the disparate conclusions to which lower courts were coming as they ruled on issues of amended complaints and relating back certain filings to previous filing dates.<br /><br />In this case, Tyman v. Hintz Concrete et al, CV-06-0008-PR, the plaintiff was injured at a construction site. Tyman v. Hintz Concrete et al 2. The plaintiff’s attorney, unfortunately, had difficulty determining who was responsible for the construction site and initially provided notice to the City of Surprise of the intent to sue. Id. Upon discovering that the City of Surprise was not responsible for the site, the plaintiff searched for the appropriate party to sue. Id. at 2-3. With incorrect parties listed on her complaint, the plaintiff was forced to file suit immediately before the statute of limitations ran. Id. 3.<br /><br />After filing her initial complaint in the Maricopa County Superior Court and subsequent to Arizona’s two-year statute of limitations, the plaintiff discovered and added the defendants actually responsible for the construction site where she was injured. Id. The defendants moved for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations, which the Maricopa County Superior Court granted and the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed. Id. Plaintiff appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court who upheld the lower courts’ decisions. Id.<br /><br />In agreeing with the lower courts’ ultimate rulings, the Arizona Supreme Court determined that the Maricopa County Superior Court judge’s reasoning was most in line with the Supreme Court’s thinking. Id. at 6-9, 11. Although the Court of Appeals also ruled for the defendants, the Supreme Court found fault with its logic. Id. at 7-9. Thus, the Arizona Supreme Court’s more closely approximates the Maricopa County Superior Court’s holding, although the Supreme Court also found some of the trial court’s reasoning faulty. Id. 7.<br /><br />Specifically, the Arizona Supreme Court’s ruled that the type of mistake Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c) anticipates had not occurred in Ms. Tyman’s case. Rule 15’s mistake provision extends to certain types of identification errors but not to situations where a party absolutely does not know who the proper defendant might be. Id. at 10-15.<br /><br />Thus, Ms. Tyman’s amended complaint was filed too late, her case remained dismissed and she was denied a chance at redress against the defendants.<br />__________________<br /><br />*Attorney Carrie M. Wilcox is the sole shareholder of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C. She is a graduate of Arizona State College of Law where she was a Note and Comment Editor for the Arizona State University Law Journal and former intern for the Honorable Rudolph Gerber, Arizona Court of Appeals. Ms. Wilcox is admitted to practice in the Arizona state courts and federal district court. Ms. Wilcox practices in the areas of business formation and creditor rights/debt collection. She also has wide-ranging experience in civil litigation, including employment law, family law, personal injury and business representation. Please contact Attorney Carrie Wilcox at 602.631.9555 for further information.<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">http://www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></u></span></em><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota</strong></span>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-116758520031328512?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(87) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2006/12/court-rules-on-statute-of-limitations.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(4652) "<div align="center">By Carrie Wilcox, Esq.</div><br />The Arizona Supreme Court recently interpreted Rule 15(c) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. In so interpreting, the Supreme Court intended to end the disparate conclusions to which lower courts were coming as they ruled on issues of amended complaints and relating back certain filings to previous filing dates.<br /><br />In this case, Tyman v. Hintz Concrete et al, CV-06-0008-PR, the plaintiff was injured at a construction site. Tyman v. Hintz Concrete et al 2. The plaintiff’s attorney, unfortunately, had difficulty determining who was responsible for the construction site and initially provided notice to the City of Surprise of the intent to sue. Id. Upon discovering that the City of Surprise was not responsible for the site, the plaintiff searched for the appropriate party to sue. Id. at 2-3. With incorrect parties listed on her complaint, the plaintiff was forced to file suit immediately before the statute of limitations ran. Id. 3.<br /><br />After filing her initial complaint in the Maricopa County Superior Court and subsequent to Arizona’s two-year statute of limitations, the plaintiff discovered and added the defendants actually responsible for the construction site where she was injured. Id. The defendants moved for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations, which the Maricopa County Superior Court granted and the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed. Id. Plaintiff appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court who upheld the lower courts’ decisions. Id.<br /><br />In agreeing with the lower courts’ ultimate rulings, the Arizona Supreme Court determined that the Maricopa County Superior Court judge’s reasoning was most in line with the Supreme Court’s thinking. Id. at 6-9, 11. Although the Court of Appeals also ruled for the defendants, the Supreme Court found fault with its logic. Id. at 7-9. Thus, the Arizona Supreme Court’s more closely approximates the Maricopa County Superior Court’s holding, although the Supreme Court also found some of the trial court’s reasoning faulty. Id. 7.<br /><br />Specifically, the Arizona Supreme Court’s ruled that the type of mistake Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c) anticipates had not occurred in Ms. Tyman’s case. Rule 15’s mistake provision extends to certain types of identification errors but not to situations where a party absolutely does not know who the proper defendant might be. Id. at 10-15.<br /><br />Thus, Ms. Tyman’s amended complaint was filed too late, her case remained dismissed and she was denied a chance at redress against the defendants.<br />__________________<br /><br />*Attorney Carrie M. Wilcox is the sole shareholder of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C. She is a graduate of Arizona State College of Law where she was a Note and Comment Editor for the Arizona State University Law Journal and former intern for the Honorable Rudolph Gerber, Arizona Court of Appeals. Ms. Wilcox is admitted to practice in the Arizona state courts and federal district court. Ms. Wilcox practices in the areas of business formation and creditor rights/debt collection. She also has wide-ranging experience in civil litigation, including employment law, family law, personal injury and business representation. Please contact Attorney Carrie Wilcox at 602.631.9555 for further information.<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">http://www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></u></span></em><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota</strong></span>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-116758520031328512?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [2]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-116036955627739260" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:50:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2006-12-31T10:49:31.083-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(60) "ARIZONA SUPREME COURT RULES IN TWO AUTOMOBILE WARRANTY CASES" ["description"]=> string(90774) "<span style="font-family:verdana;">Although not related to family law, the following article may be interesting to anyone who has bought or leased a car that didn't turn out to work so well.... The script got a little fussy so you'll see some bold, some normal text.</span><br /><br />____________________________________________________________________<br /><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-ALIGN: center"><span style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:14;"><span style="font-size:100%;">ARIZONA SUPREME COURT RULES IN TWO<br />AUTOMOBILE WARRANTY CASES</span><?xml:namespace prefix = o /><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold" align="center"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-size:85%;">By Carrie Wilcox, Esq.*</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:red;">Summary: The Arizona Supreme Court deals with automobile warranties, service contracts and lemon law issues in recent legal decisions.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:red;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:red;"><span style="font-size:0;"></span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" ><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 60pt"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The Arizona Supreme Court recently decided two cases involving motor vehicle warranty issues.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>In the first, <span style="color:black;">Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation, </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">130 P.3d 530; 473 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 32, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the questions revolved around an automobile lease situation, the Arizona Lemon law and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>The second case, J<span style="color:black;">ohnson v. Earnhardt's Gilbert Dodge, Inc., 132 P.3d 825; 476 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 33, also involved the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act as well as a service contract issue.</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 60pt"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">A.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span><i><u><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler</span></u></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;"><span style="font-size:0;"> </span>(full text of case available at http://www.wilcoxlegal.com)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">In denying Mr. Parrot relief under both the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (hereinafter the “Warranty Act”) and the Arizona Motor Vehicle Warranties Act (commonly referred to as Arizona’s Lemon Law), the Arizona Supreme Court wrestled with two primary issues, including whether Mr. Parrot was a consumer as defined by the Warranty Act and whether the limited relief available to consumers under Arizona’s Lemon Law was available to him.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>In overturning the Arizona Court of Appeals decision that favored Mr. Parrot, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that neither the federal Warranty Act nor the state Lemon Law allowed Mr. Parrot the relief he sought.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;"></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">1.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>(</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(<span style="color:black;">15 U.S.C. §§ 2301-2312)</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in"></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">Unfortunately for Mr. Parrot, the Arizona Supreme Court found that Mr. Parrot was not a consumer under the Warranty Act because Mr. Parrot’s lessee status prevented him from qualifying as a consumer for purposes of applying the Warranty Act to his vehicle dispute.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>No qualifying sale to him was made and that meant the Warranty Act did not provide him relief.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Upon disposing of the Warranty Act claims brought by Mr. Parrot, the court turned to the Arizona Lemon Law.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">2.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">Arizona Motor Vehicle Warranties Act</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in"></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in" align="left"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">As it did with its analysis under the Warranty Act, the Arizona Supreme Court decided against Mr. Parrot essentially because of his status as a lessee and not an owner.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Although the court noted that the definition of consumer under the Lemon Law was different than under the Warranty Act, the court decided against Mr. Parrot on other grounds.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;"></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">Under the Arizona Lemon Law, two remedies are available: (a) a consumer may return the vehicle to the manufacturer, or (b) the consumer may have the vehicle replaced.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>However, the court noted that these remedies <i>only apply if the consumer is the owner of the vehicle</i>.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Mr. Parrot leased the vehicle and did not own it; therefore, the Lemon Law provided him no relief.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;"><span style="font-size:0;"></span>B.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span><i><u>Johnson v. Earnhardt’s Gilbert Dodge</u></i><span style="font-size:0;"> </span>(full text of case available at http://www.wilcoxlegal.com)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" ><span style="font-size:0;"></span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">One month after the </span><i style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Parrot</i><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"> case, above, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled on another case involving the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, DaimlerChrysler and an allegedly malfunctioning automobile.</span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"> </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">However, in this case, the car was purchased, not leased, as it was in </span><i style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Parrot</i><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">.</span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"> </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">In addition, although the vehicle purchased was a Kia, Ms. Johnson purchased a service contract from DaimlerChrysler for the vehicle through the Chrysler dealership from which she bought the car.</span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"> </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">The Arizona Supreme Court reviewed the case after the trial court granted Earnhardt’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the Arizona Court of Appeals reversed the trial court in favor of Johnson.</span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"> </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Two key issues were presented to the Arizona Supreme Court.</span><o:p style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" >1.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" >Service Contract</span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" > The Arizona Supreme Court examined the issue of whether Earnhardt had entered into a service contract with Ms. Johnson or if the service contract was only with DaimlerChrysler since they were the entity that provided the service contract.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 1.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" >The court found that the circumstances surrounding the service contract were ambiguous and that a grant of summary judgment was inappropriate on that basis.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Some of the ambiguous facts included that Earnhardt, the dealer, had sold the contract and was to provide repair services under the contract as signed by the dealership.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>In addition, simply put, the language of the contract itself was confusing and conflicting as were the statements of the witnesses.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>For example, the language of the contract variously states that DaimlerChrysler is the responsible party but also that Earnhardt had responsibility under the contract, too, while Ms. Johnson stated in her affidavit that she was told it was a joint warranty agreement with the dealership and DaimlerChrysler being responsible.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>The dealership, on the other hand, denied it was a party to the service contract.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>The conflict facts meant that the case had to be remanded to the trial court to determine whether Earnhardt was a party to the service contract.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" ><span style="font-size:0;"></span>2.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>(<span style="color:black;">15 U.S.C. §§ 2301-2312)</span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" ><span style="font-size:0;"></span>After concluding that the evidence surrounding the service contract created a question of fact allowing that issue to survive summary judgment, the Arizona Supreme Court next turned to the issue of whether the service contract was a warranty as defined by the Warranty Act.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Although the Arizona Court of Appeals concluded that the service contract was such a warranty, the Supreme Court disagreed reasoning that the separate consideration paid for the service contract means that the service contract cannot also be a written warranty under the definition contained within the Warranty Act.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" ><span style="font-size:0;"></span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" >Thus, the Arizona Supreme Court remanded the <i>Johnson</i> case back to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with its reasoning.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.75in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.25in; TEXT-ALIGN: center" align="center"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">------------------------</span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="font-size:85%;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">*Attorney Carrie M. Wilcox is the sole shareholder of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C., a multi-dimensional law firm with offices in Arizona and California.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>She is a graduate of Arizona State College of Law where she was a Note and Comment Editor for the Arizona State University Law Journal and former intern for the Honorable Rudolph Gerber, Arizona Court of Appeals. Ms. Wilcox is admitted to practice in the Arizona state courts and federal district court. Ms. Wilcox practices in the areas of <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/az-small-business-law.html">business formation</a> and <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/debt-collection-attorney.html">creditor rights/debt collection</a>. She also has wide-ranging experience in civil litigation, including <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/employment-attorney.html">employment law</a>, <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/phoenix-az-family-law.html">family law</a>, <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/arizona-personal-injury-attorney.html">personal injury</a> and <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/az-small-business-law.html">business representation</a>.<br /><br />Ms. Wilcox is a member of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA), the Maricopa County Bar Associations, State Bar of Arizona, Arizona Women Lawyers and American Bar Association.<br /><br />Ms. Wilcox is also a former instructor at the Arizona Paralegal Training Institute, where she lectured on various subjects including business formation and litigation, employment law and dissolution of marriage. She has also co-chaired seminars for other attorneys on divorce procedure on behalf of the Lorman Institute.</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center"><b><u><span style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:16;"><span style="font-size:100%;">APPENDIX</span><o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span></b><b><u><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Arizona Statutes<o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1261. <u>Definitions; exemptions</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. In this article, unless the context otherwise requires:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. "Consumer" means the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, of a motor vehicle, any person to whom the motor vehicle is transferred during the duration of an express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle or any other person entitled by the terms of the warranty to enforce the obligations of the warranty.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2. "Motor vehicle" means a self-propelled vehicle designated primarily for the transportation of persons or property over the public highways.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3. "Used motor vehicle" means a motor vehicle that has been sold, bargained, exchanged or given away or the title to which has been transferred from the person who first acquired the vehicle from the manufacturer, importer or dealer or agent of the manufacturer or importer and that has been placed in bona fide consumer use.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">4. "Used motor vehicle dealer" means a person or business that sells or offers for sale a used motor vehicle after selling or offering for sale four or more used motor vehicles in the previous twelve months but does not include a bank or financial institution, an insurance company, a business selling a used motor vehicle to an employee of that business, a lessor selling a leased vehicle by or to the lessee of that vehicle or to an employee of the lessee of that vehicle or a person who buys, sells, exchanges or offers or attempts to negotiate a sale of or exchange an interest in a classic car as defined in section 28-2483 or a historic vehicle as defined in section 28-2484.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. If the motor vehicle is a motor home, the provisions of this article shall apply to the self-propelled vehicle and chassis but not to those portions of the vehicle designed, used or maintained primarily as a mobile dwelling, office or commercial space.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C. The provisions of this article do not apply to a sale of a motor vehicle to a purchaser for the purpose of resale for profit or to a motor vehicle with a declared gross weight over ten thousand pounds or that is sold at a public auction. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1262. <u>New motor vehicle; repair during express warranty or two years or twenty-four thousand miles</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. If a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. A consumer shall report the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer or issuer of a warranty during the shorter of the following:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a) The term of the express warranty.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b) The period of two years or twenty-four thousand miles following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever is earlier.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2. The manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer or the issuer of a warranty shall make those repairs that are necessary to conform the motor vehicle to such express warranties, even if the repairs are made after the expiration of the term or two year period or twenty-four thousand mile limit.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. This section does not limit in any way the remedies available to a consumer under a new motor vehicle warranty that extends beyond the limits prescribed in this section. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1263. <u>Inability to conform motor vehicle to express warranty; replacement of vehicle or refund of monies; affirmative defenses; tax refund</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. If the manufacturer, its agents or its authorized dealers are unable to conform the motor vehicle to any applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or condition which substantially impairs the use and value of the motor vehicle to the consumer after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer shall replace the motor vehicle with a new motor vehicle or accept return of the motor vehicle from the consumer and refund to the consumer the full purchase price, including all collateral charges, less a reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle. The manufacturer shall make refunds to the consumer and lienholder, if any, as their interests appear. A reasonable allowance for use is that amount directly attributable to use by the consumer before his first written report of the nonconformity to the manufacturer, agent or dealer and during any subsequent period when the vehicle is not out of service by reason of repair.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. It is an affirmative defense to any claim under this article that either:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. An alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use and market value of the motor vehicle.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2. A nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the motor vehicle. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C. In the case of taxes paid pursuant to title 42, chapter 5, if the manufacturer:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. Accepts return of a motor vehicle from a consumer without replacing the motor vehicle, the manufacturer shall refund the amount of tax attributed to the sale of the vehicle to that consumer.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2. Replaces a motor vehicle with a new motor vehicle of lesser value, the manufacturer shall refund the difference between the original amount of tax attributed to the sale of that vehicle and the amount of tax attributed to the sale of the replacement vehicle, excluding the value of the motor vehicle being replaced.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3. Replaces a motor vehicle with a new motor vehicle of greater value, the manufacturer shall calculate the gross proceeds of sales pursuant to section 42-5001, paragraph 6.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">D. Pursuant to section 42-1118, subsection F, the manufacturer may apply to the department of revenue for a refund for the amount of tax that the manufacturer properly refunds to the consumer. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1264. <u>Reasonable number of attempts to conform motor vehicle to express warranty; presumption</u><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. It is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties if either:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. The same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times by the manufacturer or its agents or authorized dealers during the shorter of the express warranty term or the period of two years or twenty-four thousand miles following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever is earlier, but the nonconformity continues to exist.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2. The motor vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a cumulative total of thirty or more calendar days during the shorter of the express warranty term or the two year period or twenty-four thousand miles, whichever is earlier.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. The term of an express warranty, the two year period and the thirty day period are extended by any period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of any war, invasion, strike, fire, flood or other natural disaster.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C. The presumption prescribed in this section does not apply against a manufacturer unless the manufacturer has received prior direct written notification from or on behalf of the consumer of the alleged defect and has had an opportunity to cure the alleged defect. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1265. <u>Nonlimitation of rights; refund or replacement not required if certain procedures not followed; attorney fees</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. If a manufacturer has established or participates in an informal dispute settlement procedure which complies in all respects with 16 code of federal regulations part 703, section 44-1263 relating to refunds or replacement does not apply to any consumer who has not first resorted to such a procedure.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. A consumer shall begin an action under this article within six months following the earlier of expiration of the express warranty term or two years or twenty-four thousand miles following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever is earlier. If a consumer prevails in an action under this article, the court shall award the consumer reasonable costs and attorney fees. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1266. <u>Notice to dealers and prospective purchasers</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. A manufacturer who has been ordered by judgment or decree to replace or repurchase or who has replaced or repurchased a motor vehicle pursuant to this article or the repair or replace laws of another state shall, before offering the motor vehicle for resale, attach to the motor vehicle written notification indicating the motor vehicle has been replaced or repurchased. A consumer has a cause of action against any person who removes the written notification from the motor vehicle, except as provided in subsection B of this section.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. A motor vehicle dealer, broker, wholesale motor vehicle dealer or wholesale motor vehicle auction dealer as defined in section 28-4301 who offers for sale a motor vehicle that has been replaced or repurchased pursuant to this article or the repair or replace laws of another state shall provide the purchaser with the manufacturer's written notification indicating that the motor vehicle has been replaced or repurchased before completion of the sale.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C. It shall constitute an affirmative defense in an action brought pursuant to subsection A of this section against a motor vehicle dealer or an agent of a motor vehicle dealer that the notification described in subsection A of this section was removed by someone other than the dealer or agent without the knowledge of the dealer or agent.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1267. <u>Used motor vehicles; title; implied warranty of merchantability disclaimer; waiver; burden of proof; remedies</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. Before the seller attempts to sell a used motor vehicle the seller shall possess the title to the used motor vehicle and the title shall be in the seller's name.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. Except as provided in subsection I of this section and in addition to the requirements of section 28-4412, a used motor vehicle dealer shall not exclude, modify or disclaim the implied warranty of merchantability prescribed in section 47-2314 or limit the remedies for a breach of that warranty, except as otherwise provided in this section, before midnight of the fifteenth calendar day after delivery of a used motor vehicle or until a used motor vehicle is driven five hundred miles after delivery, whichever is earlier. In calculating time under this subsection, a day on which the warranty is breached is excluded and all subsequent days in which the motor vehicle fails to conform with the implied warranty of merchantability are also excluded. In calculating distance under this subsection, the miles driven to obtain or in connection with the repair, servicing or testing of the motor vehicle that fails to conform with the implied warranty of merchantability are excluded. An attempt to exclude, modify or disclaim the implied warranty of merchantability or to limit the remedies for a breach of that warranty, except as otherwise provided in this section, in violation of this subsection renders a purchase agreement voidable at the option of the purchaser.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C. For the purposes of this section, the implied warranty of merchantability is met if the motor vehicle functions in a safe condition as provided in title 28, chapter 3, article 16 and is substantially free of any defect that significantly limits the use of the motor vehicle for the ordinary purpose of transportation on any public highway. The implied warranty of merchantability expires at midnight of the fifteenth calendar day after delivery of a used motor vehicle or when a used motor vehicle has been driven five hundred miles after delivery, whichever is earlier. In calculating time under this subsection, a day on which the warranty is breached is excluded and all subsequent days in which the motor vehicle fails to conform with the implied warranty of merchantability are also excluded. In calculating distance under this subsection, the miles driven to obtain or in connection with the repair, servicing or testing of the motor vehicle that fails to conform with the implied warranty of merchantability are excluded.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">D. The implied warranty of merchantability described in this section does not extend to damage that occurs after the sale of the motor vehicle and that is the result of any abuse, misuse, neglect, failure to perform regular maintenance or to maintain adequate oil, coolant or other required fluid or lubricant or off road use, racing or towing.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E. If the implied warranty of merchantability described in this section is breached, the purchaser shall give reasonable notice to the seller. Before the purchaser exercises any other remedies under title 47, chapter 2, the seller shall have a reasonable opportunity to repair the vehicle. The purchaser shall pay one-half of the cost of the first two repairs necessary to bring the vehicle in compliance with the warranty. The purchaser's payments are limited to a maximum payment of twenty-five dollars for each repair.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">2.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span></b><b><u><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act</span></u></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-size:0;"> </span>(15 U.S.C. </span></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">15 U.S.C. §§ 2301-2312)<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2301. Definitions<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">For the purposes of this chapter: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “consumer product” means any tangible personal property which is distributed in commerce and which is normally used for personal, family, or household purposes (including any such property intended to be attached to or installed in any real property without regard to whether it is so attached or installed). </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “Commission” means the Federal Trade Commission. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “consumer” means a buyer (other than for purposes of resale) of any consumer product, any person to whom such product is transferred during the duration of an implied or written warranty (or service contract) applicable to the product, and any other person who is entitled by the terms of such warranty (or service contract) or under applicable State law to enforce against the warrantor (or service contractor) the obligations of the warranty (or service contract). </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(4)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “supplier” means any person engaged in the business of making a consumer product directly or indirectly available to consumers. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(5)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “warrantor” means any supplier or other person who gives or offers to give a written warranty or who is or may be obligated under an implied warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(6)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “written warranty” means— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">any written affirmation of fact or written promise made in connection with the sale of a consumer product by a supplier to a buyer which relates to the nature of the material or workmanship and affirms or promises that such material or workmanship is defect free or will meet a specified level of performance over a specified period of time, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">any undertaking in writing in connection with the sale by a supplier of a consumer product to refund, repair, replace, or take other remedial action with respect to such product in the event that such product fails to meet the specifications set forth in the undertaking, </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">which written affirmation, promise, or undertaking becomes part of the basis of the bargain between a supplier and a buyer for purposes other than resale of such product. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(7)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “implied warranty” means an implied warranty arising under State law (as modified by sections 2308 and 2304 (a) of this title) in connection with the sale by a supplier of a consumer product. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(8)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “service contract” means a contract in writing to perform, over a fixed period of time or for a specified duration, services relating to the maintenance or repair (or both) of a consumer product. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(9)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “reasonable and necessary maintenance” consists of those operations </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">which the consumer reasonably can be expected to perform or have performed and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">which are necessary to keep any consumer product performing its intended function and operating at a reasonable level of performance. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(10)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “remedy” means whichever of the following actions the warrantor elects: </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">repair, </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">replacement, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(C)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">refund; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">except that the warrantor may not elect refund unless (i) the warrantor is unable to provide replacement and repair is not commercially practicable or cannot be timely made, or (ii) the consumer is willing to accept such refund. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(11)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “replacement” means furnishing a new consumer product which is identical or reasonably equivalent to the warranted consumer product. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(12)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “refund” means refunding the actual purchase price (less reasonable depreciation based on actual use where permitted by rules of the Commission). </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(13)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “distributed in commerce” means sold in commerce, introduced or delivered for introduction into commerce, or held for sale or distribution after introduction into commerce. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(14)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “commerce” means trade, traffic, commerce, or transportation— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">between a place in a State and any place outside thereof, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">which affects trade, traffic, commerce, or transportation described in subparagraph (A). </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(15)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “State” means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Canal Zone, or American Samoa. The term “State law” includes a law of the United States applicable only to the District of Columbia or only to a territory or possession of the United States; and the term “Federal law” excludes any State law. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2302. Rules governing contents of warranties<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Full and conspicuous disclosure of terms and conditions; additional requirements for contents </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In order to improve the adequacy of information available to consumers, prevent deception, and improve competition in the marketing of consumer products, any warrantor warranting a consumer product to a consumer by means of a written warranty shall, to the extent required by rules of the Commission, fully and conspicuously disclose in simple and readily understood language the terms and conditions of such warranty. Such rules may require inclusion in the written warranty of any of the following items among others: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The clear identification of the names and addresses of the warrantors. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The identity of the party or parties to whom the warranty is extended. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The products or parts covered. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(4)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">A statement of what the warrantor will do in the event of a defect, malfunction, or failure to conform with such written warranty—at whose expense—and for what period of time. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(5)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">A statement of what the consumer must do and expenses he must bear. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(6)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Exceptions and exclusions from the terms of the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(7)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The step-by-step procedure which the consumer should take in order to obtain performance of any obligation under the warranty, including the identification of any person or class of persons authorized to perform the obligations set forth in the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(8)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Information respecting the availability of any informal dispute settlement procedure offered by the warrantor and a recital, where the warranty so provides, that the purchaser may be required to resort to such procedure before pursuing any legal remedies in the courts. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(9)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">A brief, general description of the legal remedies available to the consumer. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(10)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The time at which the warrantor will perform any obligations under the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(11)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The period of time within which, after notice of a defect, malfunction, or failure to conform with the warranty, the warrantor will perform any obligations under the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(12)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The characteristics or properties of the products, or parts thereof, that are not covered by the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(13)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The elements of the warranty in words or phrases which would not mislead a reasonable, average consumer as to the nature or scope of the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Availability of terms to consumer; manner and form for presentation and display of information; duration; extension of period for written warranty or service contract </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">The Commission shall prescribe rules requiring that the terms of any written warranty on a consumer product be made available to the consumer (or prospective consumer) prior to the sale of the product to him. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">The Commission may prescribe rules for determining the manner and form in which information with respect to any written warranty of a consumer product shall be clearly and conspicuously presented or displayed so as not to mislead the reasonable, average consumer, when such information is contained in advertising, labeling, point-of-sale material, or other representations in writing. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Nothing in this chapter (other than paragraph (3) of this subsection) shall be deemed to authorize the Commission to prescribe the duration of written warranties given or to require that a consumer product or any of its components be warranted. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The Commission may prescribe rules for extending the period of time a written warranty or service contract is in effect to correspond with any period of time in excess of a reasonable period (not less than 10 days) during which the consumer is deprived of the use of such consumer product by reason of failure of the product to conform with the written warranty or by reason of the failure of the warrantor (or service contractor) to carry out such warranty (or service contract) within the period specified in the warranty (or service contract). </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Prohibition on conditions for written or implied warranty; waiver by Commission </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumer’s using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name; except that the prohibition of this subsection may be waived by the Commission if— <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">the warrantor satisfies the Commission that the warranted product will function properly only if the article or service so identified is used in connection with the warranted product, and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">the Commission finds that such a waiver is in the public interest. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The Commission shall identify in the Federal Register, and permit public comment on, all applications for waiver of the prohibition of this subsection, and shall publish in the Federal Register its disposition of any such application, including the reasons therefor. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(d)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Incorporation by reference of detailed substantive warranty provisions </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The Commission may by rule devise detailed substantive warranty provisions which warrantors may incorporate by reference in their warranties. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(e)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Applicability to consumer products costing more than $5 </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The provisions of this section apply only to warranties which pertain to consumer products actually costing the consumer more than $5. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2303. Designation of written warranties<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Full (statement of duration) or limited warranty </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Any warrantor warranting a consumer product by means of a written warranty shall clearly and conspicuously designate such warranty in the following manner, unless exempted from doing so by the Commission pursuant to subsection (c) of this section: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">If the written warranty meets the Federal minimum standards for warranty set forth in section 2304 of this title, then it shall be conspicuously designated a “full (statement of duration) warranty”. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">If the written warranty does not meet the Federal minimum standards for warranty set forth in section 2304 of this title, then it shall be conspicuously designated a “limited warranty”. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Applicability of requirements, standards, etc., to representations or statements of customer satisfaction </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This section and sections 2302 and 2304 of this title shall not apply to statements or representations which are similar to expressions of general policy concerning customer satisfaction and which are not subject to any specific limitations. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Exemptions by Commission </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In addition to exercising the authority pertaining to disclosure granted in section 2302 of this title, the Commission may by rule determine when a written warranty does not have to be designated either “full (statement of duration)” or “limited” in accordance with this section. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(d)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Applicability to consumer products costing more than $10 and not designated as full warranties </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The provisions of subsections (a) and (c) of this section apply only to warranties which pertain to consumer products actually costing the consumer more than $10 and which are not designated “full (statement of duration) warranties”. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2304. Federal minimum standards for warranties<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Remedies under written warranty; duration of implied warranty; exclusion or limitation on consequential damages for breach of written or implied warranty; election of refund or replacement </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In order for a warrantor warranting a consumer product by means of a written warranty to meet the Federal minimum standards for warranty— <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">such warrantor must as a minimum remedy such consumer product within a reasonable time and without charge, in the case of a defect, malfunction, or failure to conform with such written warranty; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">notwithstanding section 2308 (b) of this title, such warrantor may not impose any limitation on the duration of any implied warranty on the product; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">such warrantor may not exclude or limit consequential damages for breach of any written or implied warranty on such product, unless such exclusion or limitation conspicuously appears on the face of the warranty; and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(4)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">if the product (or a component part thereof) contains a defect or malfunction after a reasonable number of attempts by the warrantor to remedy defects or malfunctions in such product, such warrantor must permit the consumer to elect either a refund for, or replacement without charge of, such product or part (as the case may be). The Commission may by rule specify for purposes of this paragraph, what constitutes a reasonable number of attempts to remedy particular kinds of defects or malfunctions under different circumstances. If the warrantor replaces a component part of a consumer product, such replacement shall include installing the part in the product without charge. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Duties and conditions imposed on consumer by warrantor </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">In fulfilling the duties under subsection (a) of this section respecting a written warranty, the warrantor shall not impose any duty other than notification upon any consumer as a condition of securing remedy of any consumer product which malfunctions, is defective, or does not conform to the written warranty, unless the warrantor has demonstrated in a rulemaking proceeding, or can demonstrate in an administrative or judicial enforcement proceeding (including private enforcement), or in an informal dispute settlement proceeding, that such a duty is reasonable. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a warrantor may require, as a condition to replacement of, or refund for, any consumer product under subsection (a) of this section, that such consumer product shall be made available to the warrantor free and clear of liens and other encumbrances, except as otherwise provided by rule or order of the Commission in cases in which such a requirement would not be practicable. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The Commission may, by rule define in detail the duties set forth in subsection (a) of this section and the applicability of such duties to warrantors of different categories of consumer products with “full (statement of duration)” warranties. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(4)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The duties under subsection (a) of this section extend from the warrantor to each person who is a consumer with respect to the consumer product. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Waiver of standards </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The performance of the duties under subsection (a) of this section shall not be required of the warrantor if he can show that the defect, malfunction, or failure of any warranted consumer product to conform with a written warranty, was caused by damage (not resulting from defect or malfunction) while in the possession of the consumer, or unreasonable use (including failure to provide reasonable and necessary maintenance). <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(d)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Remedy without charge </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">For purposes of this section and of section 2302 (c) of this title, the term “without charge” means that the warrantor may not assess the consumer for any costs the warrantor or his representatives incur in connection with the required remedy of a warranted consumer product. An obligation under subsection (a)(1)(A) of this section to remedy without charge does not necessarily require the warrantor to compensate the consumer for incidental expenses; however, if any incidental expenses are incurred because the remedy is not made within a reasonable time or because the warrantor imposed an unreasonable duty upon the consumer as a condition of securing remedy, then the consumer shall be entitled to recover reasonable incidental expenses which are so incurred in any action against the warrantor. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(e)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Incorporation of standards to products designated with full warranty for purposes of judicial actions </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">If a supplier designates a warranty applicable to a consumer product as a “full (statement of duration)” warranty, then the warranty on such product shall, for purposes of any action under section 2310 (d) of this title or under any State law, be deemed to incorporate at least the minimum requirements of this section and rules prescribed under this section. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2305. Full and limited warranting of a consumer product<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit the selling of a consumer product which has both full and limited warranties if such warranties are clearly and conspicuously differentiated. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2306. Service contracts; rules for full, clear and conspicuous disclosure of terms and conditions; addition to or in lieu of written warranty<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The Commission may prescribe by rule the manner and form in which the terms and conditions of service contracts shall be fully, clearly, and conspicuously disclosed. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent a supplier or warrantor from entering into a service contract with the consumer in addition to or in lieu of a written warranty if such contract fully, clearly, and conspicuously discloses its terms and conditions in simple and readily understood language. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2307. Designation of representatives by warrantor to perform duties under written or implied warranty<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent any warrantor from designating representatives to perform duties under the written or implied warranty: Provided, That such warrantor shall make reasonable arrangements for compensation of such designated representatives, but no such designation shall relieve the warrantor of his direct responsibilities to the consumer or make the representative a cowarrantor. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2308. Implied warranties<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Restrictions on disclaimers or modifications </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">No supplier may disclaim or modify (except as provided in subsection (b) of this section) any implied warranty to a consumer with respect to such consumer product if <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">such supplier makes any written warranty to the consumer with respect to such consumer Product, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">at the time of sale, or within 90 days thereafter, such supplier enters into a service contract with the consumer which applies to such consumer product. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Limitation on duration </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">For purposes of this chapter (other than section 2304 (a)(2) of this title), implied warranties may be limited in duration to the duration of a written warranty of reasonable duration, if such limitation is conscionable and is set forth in clear and unmistakable language and prominently displayed on the face of the warranty. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Effectiveness of disclaimers, modifications, or limitations </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A disclaimer, modification, or limitation made in violation of this section shall be ineffective for purposes of this chapter and State law. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2309. Procedures applicable to promulgation of rules by Commission<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Oral presentation </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Any rule prescribed under this chapter shall be prescribed in accordance with section 553 of title 5; except that the Commission shall give interested persons an opportunity for oral presentations of data, views, and arguments, in addition to written submissions. A transcript shall be kept of any oral presentation. Any such rule shall be subject to judicial review under section 57a (e) of this title in the same manner as rules prescribed under section 57a (a)(1)(B) of this title, except that section 57a (e)(3)(B) of this title shall not apply. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Warranties and warranty practices involved in sale of used motor vehicles </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The Commission shall initiate within one year after January 4, 1975, a rulemaking proceeding dealing with warranties and warranty practices in connection with the sale of used motor vehicles; and, to the extent necessary to supplement the protections offered the consumer by this chapter, shall prescribe rules dealing with such warranties and practices. In prescribing rules under this subsection, the Commission may exercise any authority it may have under this chapter, or other law, and in addition it may require disclosure that a used motor vehicle is sold without any warranty and specify the form and content of such disclosure. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2310. Remedies in consumer disputes<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Informal dispute settlement procedures; establishment; rules setting forth minimum requirements; effect of compliance by warrantor; review of informal procedures or implementation by Commission; application to existing informal procedures </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Congress hereby declares it to be its policy to encourage warrantors to establish procedures whereby consumer disputes are fairly and expeditiously settled through informal dispute settlement mechanisms. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The Commission shall prescribe rules setting forth minimum requirements for any informal dispute settlement procedure which is incorporated into the terms of a written warranty to which any provision of this chapter applies. Such rules shall provide for participation in such procedure by independent or governmental entities. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">One or more warrantors may establish an informal dispute settlement procedure which meets the requirements of the Commission’s rules under paragraph (2). If— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">a warrantor establishes such a procedure, </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">such procedure, and its implementation, meets the requirements of such rules, and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(C)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">he incorporates in a written warranty a requirement that the consumer resort to such procedure before pursuing any legal remedy under this section respecting such warranty, </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">then <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(i)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-4">the consumer may not commence a civil action (other than a class action) under subsection (d) of this section unless he initially resorts to such procedure; and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(ii)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-4">a class of consumers may not proceed in a class action under subsection (d) of this section except to the extent the court determines necessary to establish the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs, unless the named plaintiffs (upon notifying the defendant that they are named plaintiffs in a class action with respect to a warranty obligation) initially resort to such procedure. In the case of such a class action which is brought in a district court of the United States, the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs shall be established in the application of rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In any civil action arising out of a warranty obligation and relating to a matter considered in such a procedure, any decision in such procedure shall be admissible in evidence. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(4)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The Commission on its own initiative may, or upon written complaint filed by any interested person shall, review the bona fide operation of any dispute settlement procedure resort to which is stated in a written warranty to be a prerequisite to pursuing a legal remedy under this section. If the Commission finds that such procedure or its implementation fails to comply with the requirements of the rules under paragraph (2), the Commission may take appropriate remedial action under any authority it may have under this chapter or any other provision of law. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(5)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Until rules under paragraph (2) take effect, this subsection shall not affect the validity of any informal dispute settlement procedure respecting consumer warranties, but in any action under subsection (d) of this section, the court may invalidate any such procedure if it finds that such procedure is unfair. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Prohibited acts </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">It shall be a violation of section 45 (a)(1) of this title for any person to fail to comply with any requirement imposed on such person by this chapter (or a rule thereunder) or to violate any prohibition contained in this chapter (or a rule thereunder). <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Injunction proceedings by Attorney General or Commission for deceptive warranty, noncompliance with requirements, or violating prohibitions; procedures; definitions </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of any action brought by the Attorney General (in his capacity as such), or by the Commission by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, to restrain </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">any warrantor from making a deceptive warranty with respect to a consumer product, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">any person from failing to comply with any requirement imposed on such person by or pursuant to this chapter or from violating any prohibition contained in this chapter. Upon proper showing that, weighing the equities and considering the Commission’s or Attorney General’s likelihood of ultimate success, such action would be in the public interest and after notice to the defendant, a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction may be granted without bond. In the case of an action brought by the Commission, if a complaint under section 45 of this title is not filed within such period (not exceeding 10 days) as may be specified by the court after the issuance of the temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, the order or injunction shall be dissolved by the court and be of no further force and effect. Any suit shall be brought in the district in which such person resides or transacts business. Whenever it appears to the court that the ends of justice require that other persons should be parties in the action, the court may cause them to be summoned whether or not they reside in the district in which the court is held, and to that end process may be served in any district. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">For the purposes of this subsection, the term “deceptive warranty” means </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">a written warranty which </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(i)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-4">contains an affirmation, promise, description, or representation which is either false or fraudulent, or which, in light of all of the circumstances, would mislead a reasonable individual exercising due care; or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(ii)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-4">fails to contain information which is necessary in light of all of the circumstances, to make the warranty not misleading to a reasonable individual exercising due care; or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">a written warranty created by the use of such terms as “guaranty” or “warranty”, if the terms and conditions of such warranty so limit its scope and application as to deceive a reasonable individual. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(d)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Civil action by consumer for damages, etc.; jurisdiction; recovery of costs and expenses; cognizable claims </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Subject to subsections (a)(3) and (e) of this section, a consumer who is damaged by the failure of a supplier, warrantor, or service contractor to comply with any obligation under this chapter, or under a written warranty, implied warranty, or service contract, may bring suit for damages and other legal and equitable relief— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">in any court of competent jurisdiction in any State or the District of Columbia; or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">in an appropriate district court of the United States, subject to paragraph (3) of this subsection. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">If a consumer finally prevails in any action brought under paragraph (1) of this subsection, he may be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of cost and expenses (including attorneys’ fees based on actual time expended) determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the plaintiff for or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action, unless the court in its discretion shall determine that such an award of attorneys’ fees would be inappropriate. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">No claim shall be cognizable in a suit brought under paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">if the amount in controversy of any individual claim is less than the sum or value of $25; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">if the amount in controversy is less than the sum or value of $50,000 (exclusive of interests and costs) computed on the basis of all claims to be determined in this suit; or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(C)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">if the action is brought as a class action, and the number of named plaintiffs is less than one hundred. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(e)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Class actions; conditions; procedures applicable </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">No action (other than a class action or an action respecting a warranty to which subsection (a)(3) of this section applies) may be brought under subsection (d) of this section for failure to comply with any obligation under any written or implied warranty or service contract, and a class of consumers may not proceed in a class action under such subsection with respect to such a failure except to the extent the court determines necessary to establish the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs, unless the person obligated under the warranty or service contract is afforded a reasonable opportunity to cure such failure to comply. In the case of such a class action (other than a class action respecting a warranty to which subsection (a)(3) of this section applies) brought under subsection (d) of this section for breach of any written or implied warranty or service contract, such reasonable opportunity will be afforded by the named plaintiffs and they shall at that time notify the defendant that they are acting on behalf of the class. In the case of such a class action which is brought in a district court of the United States, the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs shall be established in the application of rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(f)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Warrantors subject to enforcement of remedies </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">For purposes of this section, only the warrantor actually making a written affirmation of fact, promise, or undertaking shall be deemed to have created a written warranty, and any rights arising thereunder may be enforced under this section only against such warrantor and no other person. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2311. Applicability to other laws<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Federal Trade Commission Act and Federal Seed Act </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to repeal, invalidate, or supersede the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.] or any statute defined therein as an Antitrust Act. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to repeal, invalidate, or supersede the Federal Seed Act [7 U.S.C. 1551 et seq.] and nothing in this chapter shall apply to seed for planting. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Rights, remedies, and liabilities </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Nothing in this chapter shall invalidate or restrict any right or remedy of any consumer under State law or any other Federal law. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Nothing in this chapter (other than sections 2308 and 2304 (a)(2) and (4) of this title) shall </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">affect the liability of, or impose liability on, any person for personal injury, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">supersede any provision of State law regarding consequential damages for injury to the person or other injury. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>State warranty laws </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section and in paragraph (2) of this subsection, a State requirement— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">which relates to labeling or disclosure with respect to written warranties or performance thereunder; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">which is within the scope of an applicable requirement of sections 2302, 2303, and 2304 of this title (and rules implementing such sections), and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(C)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">which is not identical to a requirement of section 2302, 2303, or 2304 of this title (or a rule thereunder), </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">shall not be applicable to written warranties complying with such sections (or rules thereunder). <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">If, upon application of an appropriate State agency, the Commission determines (pursuant to rules issued in accordance with section 2309 of this title) that any requirement of such State covering any transaction to which this chapter applies </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">affords protection to consumers greater than the requirements of this chapter and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">does not unduly burden interstate commerce, then such State requirement shall be applicable (notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1) of this subsection) to the extent specified in such determination for so long as the State administers and enforces effectively any such greater requirement. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(d)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Other Federal warranty laws </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This chapter (other than section 2302 (c) of this title) shall be inapplicable to any written warranty the making or content of which is otherwise governed by Federal law. If only a portion of a written warranty is so governed by Federal law, the remaining portion shall be subject to this chapter. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2312. Effective dates<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Effective date of chapter </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, this chapter shall take effect 6 months after January 4, 1975, but shall not apply to consumer products manufactured prior to such date. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Effective date of section 2302 (a) </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Section 2302 (a) of this title shall take effect 6 months after the final publication of rules respecting such section; except that the Commission, for good cause shown, may postpone the applicability of such sections until one year after such final publication in order to permit any designated classes of suppliers to bring their written warranties into compliance with rules promulgated pursuant to this chapter. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span style="font-size:100%;"><b>Promulgation of rules </b><o:p></o:p></span></span></p><span style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:12;"><span style="font-size:100%;">The Commission shall promulgate rules for initial implementation of this chapter as soon as possible after January 4, 1975, but in no event later than one year after such date.</span> </span><br />==================================================================<br /><br /><span style="font-family:verdana;">Visit our website: <span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></span></span><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox Legal Group, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona and a limited number of other states.</span></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-116036955627739260?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(84) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2006/10/arizona-supreme-court-rules-in-two.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(90774) "<span style="font-family:verdana;">Although not related to family law, the following article may be interesting to anyone who has bought or leased a car that didn't turn out to work so well.... The script got a little fussy so you'll see some bold, some normal text.</span><br /><br />____________________________________________________________________<br /><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-ALIGN: center"><span style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:14;"><span style="font-size:100%;">ARIZONA SUPREME COURT RULES IN TWO<br />AUTOMOBILE WARRANTY CASES</span><?xml:namespace prefix = o /><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold" align="center"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-size:85%;">By Carrie Wilcox, Esq.*</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:red;">Summary: The Arizona Supreme Court deals with automobile warranties, service contracts and lemon law issues in recent legal decisions.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:red;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:red;"><span style="font-size:0;"></span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" ><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 60pt"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The Arizona Supreme Court recently decided two cases involving motor vehicle warranty issues.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>In the first, <span style="color:black;">Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation, </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">130 P.3d 530; 473 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 32, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the questions revolved around an automobile lease situation, the Arizona Lemon law and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>The second case, J<span style="color:black;">ohnson v. Earnhardt's Gilbert Dodge, Inc., 132 P.3d 825; 476 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 33, also involved the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act as well as a service contract issue.</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 60pt"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">A.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span><i><u><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler</span></u></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;"><span style="font-size:0;"> </span>(full text of case available at http://www.wilcoxlegal.com)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">In denying Mr. Parrot relief under both the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (hereinafter the “Warranty Act”) and the Arizona Motor Vehicle Warranties Act (commonly referred to as Arizona’s Lemon Law), the Arizona Supreme Court wrestled with two primary issues, including whether Mr. Parrot was a consumer as defined by the Warranty Act and whether the limited relief available to consumers under Arizona’s Lemon Law was available to him.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>In overturning the Arizona Court of Appeals decision that favored Mr. Parrot, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that neither the federal Warranty Act nor the state Lemon Law allowed Mr. Parrot the relief he sought.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;"></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">1.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>(</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(<span style="color:black;">15 U.S.C. §§ 2301-2312)</span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in"></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">Unfortunately for Mr. Parrot, the Arizona Supreme Court found that Mr. Parrot was not a consumer under the Warranty Act because Mr. Parrot’s lessee status prevented him from qualifying as a consumer for purposes of applying the Warranty Act to his vehicle dispute.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>No qualifying sale to him was made and that meant the Warranty Act did not provide him relief.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Upon disposing of the Warranty Act claims brought by Mr. Parrot, the court turned to the Arizona Lemon Law.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">2.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">Arizona Motor Vehicle Warranties Act</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in"></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in" align="left"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">As it did with its analysis under the Warranty Act, the Arizona Supreme Court decided against Mr. Parrot essentially because of his status as a lessee and not an owner.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Although the court noted that the definition of consumer under the Lemon Law was different than under the Warranty Act, the court decided against Mr. Parrot on other grounds.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;"></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN: 0in 60pt 0pt 1.5in"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">Under the Arizona Lemon Law, two remedies are available: (a) a consumer may return the vehicle to the manufacturer, or (b) the consumer may have the vehicle replaced.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>However, the court noted that these remedies <i>only apply if the consumer is the owner of the vehicle</i>.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Mr. Parrot leased the vehicle and did not own it; therefore, the Lemon Law provided him no relief.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;"><span style="font-size:0;"></span>B.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span><i><u>Johnson v. Earnhardt’s Gilbert Dodge</u></i><span style="font-size:0;"> </span>(full text of case available at http://www.wilcoxlegal.com)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" ><span style="font-size:0;"></span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">One month after the </span><i style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Parrot</i><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"> case, above, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled on another case involving the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, DaimlerChrysler and an allegedly malfunctioning automobile.</span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"> </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">However, in this case, the car was purchased, not leased, as it was in </span><i style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Parrot</i><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">.</span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"> </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">In addition, although the vehicle purchased was a Kia, Ms. Johnson purchased a service contract from DaimlerChrysler for the vehicle through the Chrysler dealership from which she bought the car.</span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"> </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">The Arizona Supreme Court reviewed the case after the trial court granted Earnhardt’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the Arizona Court of Appeals reversed the trial court in favor of Johnson.</span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"> </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Two key issues were presented to the Arizona Supreme Court.</span><o:p style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" >1.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" >Service Contract</span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" > The Arizona Supreme Court examined the issue of whether Earnhardt had entered into a service contract with Ms. Johnson or if the service contract was only with DaimlerChrysler since they were the entity that provided the service contract.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 1.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" >The court found that the circumstances surrounding the service contract were ambiguous and that a grant of summary judgment was inappropriate on that basis.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Some of the ambiguous facts included that Earnhardt, the dealer, had sold the contract and was to provide repair services under the contract as signed by the dealership.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>In addition, simply put, the language of the contract itself was confusing and conflicting as were the statements of the witnesses.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>For example, the language of the contract variously states that DaimlerChrysler is the responsible party but also that Earnhardt had responsibility under the contract, too, while Ms. Johnson stated in her affidavit that she was told it was a joint warranty agreement with the dealership and DaimlerChrysler being responsible.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>The dealership, on the other hand, denied it was a party to the service contract.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>The conflict facts meant that the case had to be remanded to the trial court to determine whether Earnhardt was a party to the service contract.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" ><span style="font-size:0;"></span>2.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>(<span style="color:black;">15 U.S.C. §§ 2301-2312)</span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" ><span style="font-size:0;"></span>After concluding that the evidence surrounding the service contract created a question of fact allowing that issue to survive summary judgment, the Arizona Supreme Court next turned to the issue of whether the service contract was a warranty as defined by the Warranty Act.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>Although the Arizona Court of Appeals concluded that the service contract was such a warranty, the Supreme Court disagreed reasoning that the separate consideration paid for the service contract means that the service contract cannot also be a written warranty under the definition contained within the Warranty Act.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" ><span style="font-size:0;"></span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in; TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal;font-family:Verdana;" >Thus, the Arizona Supreme Court remanded the <i>Johnson</i> case back to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with its reasoning.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.75in; TEXT-INDENT: 0.25in; TEXT-ALIGN: center" align="center"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">------------------------</span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoTitle" style="TEXT-ALIGN: left" align="left"><span style="font-size:85%;"><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">*Attorney Carrie M. Wilcox is the sole shareholder of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C., a multi-dimensional law firm with offices in Arizona and California.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span>She is a graduate of Arizona State College of Law where she was a Note and Comment Editor for the Arizona State University Law Journal and former intern for the Honorable Rudolph Gerber, Arizona Court of Appeals. Ms. Wilcox is admitted to practice in the Arizona state courts and federal district court. Ms. Wilcox practices in the areas of <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/az-small-business-law.html">business formation</a> and <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/debt-collection-attorney.html">creditor rights/debt collection</a>. She also has wide-ranging experience in civil litigation, including <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/employment-attorney.html">employment law</a>, <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/phoenix-az-family-law.html">family law</a>, <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/arizona-personal-injury-attorney.html">personal injury</a> and <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/az-small-business-law.html">business representation</a>.<br /><br />Ms. Wilcox is a member of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA), the Maricopa County Bar Associations, State Bar of Arizona, Arizona Women Lawyers and American Bar Association.<br /><br />Ms. Wilcox is also a former instructor at the Arizona Paralegal Training Institute, where she lectured on various subjects including business formation and litigation, employment law and dissolution of marriage. She has also co-chaired seminars for other attorneys on divorce procedure on behalf of the Lorman Institute.</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center"><b><u><span style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:16;"><span style="font-size:100%;">APPENDIX</span><o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; TEXT-INDENT: -0.5in"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span></b><b><u><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Arizona Statutes<o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1261. <u>Definitions; exemptions</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. In this article, unless the context otherwise requires:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. "Consumer" means the purchaser, other than for purposes of resale, of a motor vehicle, any person to whom the motor vehicle is transferred during the duration of an express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle or any other person entitled by the terms of the warranty to enforce the obligations of the warranty.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2. "Motor vehicle" means a self-propelled vehicle designated primarily for the transportation of persons or property over the public highways.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3. "Used motor vehicle" means a motor vehicle that has been sold, bargained, exchanged or given away or the title to which has been transferred from the person who first acquired the vehicle from the manufacturer, importer or dealer or agent of the manufacturer or importer and that has been placed in bona fide consumer use.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">4. "Used motor vehicle dealer" means a person or business that sells or offers for sale a used motor vehicle after selling or offering for sale four or more used motor vehicles in the previous twelve months but does not include a bank or financial institution, an insurance company, a business selling a used motor vehicle to an employee of that business, a lessor selling a leased vehicle by or to the lessee of that vehicle or to an employee of the lessee of that vehicle or a person who buys, sells, exchanges or offers or attempts to negotiate a sale of or exchange an interest in a classic car as defined in section 28-2483 or a historic vehicle as defined in section 28-2484.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. If the motor vehicle is a motor home, the provisions of this article shall apply to the self-propelled vehicle and chassis but not to those portions of the vehicle designed, used or maintained primarily as a mobile dwelling, office or commercial space.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C. The provisions of this article do not apply to a sale of a motor vehicle to a purchaser for the purpose of resale for profit or to a motor vehicle with a declared gross weight over ten thousand pounds or that is sold at a public auction. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1262. <u>New motor vehicle; repair during express warranty or two years or twenty-four thousand miles</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. If a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. A consumer shall report the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer or issuer of a warranty during the shorter of the following:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a) The term of the express warranty.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b) The period of two years or twenty-four thousand miles following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever is earlier.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2. The manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer or the issuer of a warranty shall make those repairs that are necessary to conform the motor vehicle to such express warranties, even if the repairs are made after the expiration of the term or two year period or twenty-four thousand mile limit.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. This section does not limit in any way the remedies available to a consumer under a new motor vehicle warranty that extends beyond the limits prescribed in this section. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1263. <u>Inability to conform motor vehicle to express warranty; replacement of vehicle or refund of monies; affirmative defenses; tax refund</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. If the manufacturer, its agents or its authorized dealers are unable to conform the motor vehicle to any applicable express warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or condition which substantially impairs the use and value of the motor vehicle to the consumer after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer shall replace the motor vehicle with a new motor vehicle or accept return of the motor vehicle from the consumer and refund to the consumer the full purchase price, including all collateral charges, less a reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle. The manufacturer shall make refunds to the consumer and lienholder, if any, as their interests appear. A reasonable allowance for use is that amount directly attributable to use by the consumer before his first written report of the nonconformity to the manufacturer, agent or dealer and during any subsequent period when the vehicle is not out of service by reason of repair.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. It is an affirmative defense to any claim under this article that either:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. An alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use and market value of the motor vehicle.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2. A nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the motor vehicle. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C. In the case of taxes paid pursuant to title 42, chapter 5, if the manufacturer:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. Accepts return of a motor vehicle from a consumer without replacing the motor vehicle, the manufacturer shall refund the amount of tax attributed to the sale of the vehicle to that consumer.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2. Replaces a motor vehicle with a new motor vehicle of lesser value, the manufacturer shall refund the difference between the original amount of tax attributed to the sale of that vehicle and the amount of tax attributed to the sale of the replacement vehicle, excluding the value of the motor vehicle being replaced.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3. Replaces a motor vehicle with a new motor vehicle of greater value, the manufacturer shall calculate the gross proceeds of sales pursuant to section 42-5001, paragraph 6.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">D. Pursuant to section 42-1118, subsection F, the manufacturer may apply to the department of revenue for a refund for the amount of tax that the manufacturer properly refunds to the consumer. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1264. <u>Reasonable number of attempts to conform motor vehicle to express warranty; presumption</u><o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. It is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to the applicable express warranties if either:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1. The same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times by the manufacturer or its agents or authorized dealers during the shorter of the express warranty term or the period of two years or twenty-four thousand miles following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever is earlier, but the nonconformity continues to exist.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2. The motor vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a cumulative total of thirty or more calendar days during the shorter of the express warranty term or the two year period or twenty-four thousand miles, whichever is earlier.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. The term of an express warranty, the two year period and the thirty day period are extended by any period of time during which repair services are not available to the consumer because of any war, invasion, strike, fire, flood or other natural disaster.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C. The presumption prescribed in this section does not apply against a manufacturer unless the manufacturer has received prior direct written notification from or on behalf of the consumer of the alleged defect and has had an opportunity to cure the alleged defect. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1265. <u>Nonlimitation of rights; refund or replacement not required if certain procedures not followed; attorney fees</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. If a manufacturer has established or participates in an informal dispute settlement procedure which complies in all respects with 16 code of federal regulations part 703, section 44-1263 relating to refunds or replacement does not apply to any consumer who has not first resorted to such a procedure.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. A consumer shall begin an action under this article within six months following the earlier of expiration of the express warranty term or two years or twenty-four thousand miles following the date of original delivery of the motor vehicle to the consumer, whichever is earlier. If a consumer prevails in an action under this article, the court shall award the consumer reasonable costs and attorney fees. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1266. <u>Notice to dealers and prospective purchasers</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. A manufacturer who has been ordered by judgment or decree to replace or repurchase or who has replaced or repurchased a motor vehicle pursuant to this article or the repair or replace laws of another state shall, before offering the motor vehicle for resale, attach to the motor vehicle written notification indicating the motor vehicle has been replaced or repurchased. A consumer has a cause of action against any person who removes the written notification from the motor vehicle, except as provided in subsection B of this section.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. A motor vehicle dealer, broker, wholesale motor vehicle dealer or wholesale motor vehicle auction dealer as defined in section 28-4301 who offers for sale a motor vehicle that has been replaced or repurchased pursuant to this article or the repair or replace laws of another state shall provide the purchaser with the manufacturer's written notification indicating that the motor vehicle has been replaced or repurchased before completion of the sale.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C. It shall constitute an affirmative defense in an action brought pursuant to subsection A of this section against a motor vehicle dealer or an agent of a motor vehicle dealer that the notification described in subsection A of this section was removed by someone other than the dealer or agent without the knowledge of the dealer or agent.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A.R.S. §44-1267. <u>Used motor vehicles; title; implied warranty of merchantability disclaimer; waiver; burden of proof; remedies</u><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A. Before the seller attempts to sell a used motor vehicle the seller shall possess the title to the used motor vehicle and the title shall be in the seller's name.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">B. Except as provided in subsection I of this section and in addition to the requirements of section 28-4412, a used motor vehicle dealer shall not exclude, modify or disclaim the implied warranty of merchantability prescribed in section 47-2314 or limit the remedies for a breach of that warranty, except as otherwise provided in this section, before midnight of the fifteenth calendar day after delivery of a used motor vehicle or until a used motor vehicle is driven five hundred miles after delivery, whichever is earlier. In calculating time under this subsection, a day on which the warranty is breached is excluded and all subsequent days in which the motor vehicle fails to conform with the implied warranty of merchantability are also excluded. In calculating distance under this subsection, the miles driven to obtain or in connection with the repair, servicing or testing of the motor vehicle that fails to conform with the implied warranty of merchantability are excluded. An attempt to exclude, modify or disclaim the implied warranty of merchantability or to limit the remedies for a breach of that warranty, except as otherwise provided in this section, in violation of this subsection renders a purchase agreement voidable at the option of the purchaser.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C. For the purposes of this section, the implied warranty of merchantability is met if the motor vehicle functions in a safe condition as provided in title 28, chapter 3, article 16 and is substantially free of any defect that significantly limits the use of the motor vehicle for the ordinary purpose of transportation on any public highway. The implied warranty of merchantability expires at midnight of the fifteenth calendar day after delivery of a used motor vehicle or when a used motor vehicle has been driven five hundred miles after delivery, whichever is earlier. In calculating time under this subsection, a day on which the warranty is breached is excluded and all subsequent days in which the motor vehicle fails to conform with the implied warranty of merchantability are also excluded. In calculating distance under this subsection, the miles driven to obtain or in connection with the repair, servicing or testing of the motor vehicle that fails to conform with the implied warranty of merchantability are excluded.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">D. The implied warranty of merchantability described in this section does not extend to damage that occurs after the sale of the motor vehicle and that is the result of any abuse, misuse, neglect, failure to perform regular maintenance or to maintain adequate oil, coolant or other required fluid or lubricant or off road use, racing or towing.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Verdana;">E. If the implied warranty of merchantability described in this section is breached, the purchaser shall give reasonable notice to the seller. Before the purchaser exercises any other remedies under title 47, chapter 2, the seller shall have a reasonable opportunity to repair the vehicle. The purchaser shall pay one-half of the cost of the first two repairs necessary to bring the vehicle in compliance with the warranty. The purchaser's payments are limited to a maximum payment of twenty-five dollars for each repair.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">2.<span style="font-size:0;"> </span></span></b><b><u><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act</span></u></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-size:0;"> </span>(15 U.S.C. </span></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:black;">15 U.S.C. §§ 2301-2312)<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2301. Definitions<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">For the purposes of this chapter: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “consumer product” means any tangible personal property which is distributed in commerce and which is normally used for personal, family, or household purposes (including any such property intended to be attached to or installed in any real property without regard to whether it is so attached or installed). </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “Commission” means the Federal Trade Commission. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “consumer” means a buyer (other than for purposes of resale) of any consumer product, any person to whom such product is transferred during the duration of an implied or written warranty (or service contract) applicable to the product, and any other person who is entitled by the terms of such warranty (or service contract) or under applicable State law to enforce against the warrantor (or service contractor) the obligations of the warranty (or service contract). </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(4)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “supplier” means any person engaged in the business of making a consumer product directly or indirectly available to consumers. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(5)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “warrantor” means any supplier or other person who gives or offers to give a written warranty or who is or may be obligated under an implied warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(6)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “written warranty” means— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">any written affirmation of fact or written promise made in connection with the sale of a consumer product by a supplier to a buyer which relates to the nature of the material or workmanship and affirms or promises that such material or workmanship is defect free or will meet a specified level of performance over a specified period of time, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">any undertaking in writing in connection with the sale by a supplier of a consumer product to refund, repair, replace, or take other remedial action with respect to such product in the event that such product fails to meet the specifications set forth in the undertaking, </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">which written affirmation, promise, or undertaking becomes part of the basis of the bargain between a supplier and a buyer for purposes other than resale of such product. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(7)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “implied warranty” means an implied warranty arising under State law (as modified by sections 2308 and 2304 (a) of this title) in connection with the sale by a supplier of a consumer product. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(8)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “service contract” means a contract in writing to perform, over a fixed period of time or for a specified duration, services relating to the maintenance or repair (or both) of a consumer product. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(9)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “reasonable and necessary maintenance” consists of those operations </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">which the consumer reasonably can be expected to perform or have performed and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">which are necessary to keep any consumer product performing its intended function and operating at a reasonable level of performance. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(10)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “remedy” means whichever of the following actions the warrantor elects: </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">repair, </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">replacement, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(C)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">refund; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">except that the warrantor may not elect refund unless (i) the warrantor is unable to provide replacement and repair is not commercially practicable or cannot be timely made, or (ii) the consumer is willing to accept such refund. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(11)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “replacement” means furnishing a new consumer product which is identical or reasonably equivalent to the warranted consumer product. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(12)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “refund” means refunding the actual purchase price (less reasonable depreciation based on actual use where permitted by rules of the Commission). </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(13)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “distributed in commerce” means sold in commerce, introduced or delivered for introduction into commerce, or held for sale or distribution after introduction into commerce. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(14)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “commerce” means trade, traffic, commerce, or transportation— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">between a place in a State and any place outside thereof, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">which affects trade, traffic, commerce, or transportation described in subparagraph (A). </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(15)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The term “State” means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Canal Zone, or American Samoa. The term “State law” includes a law of the United States applicable only to the District of Columbia or only to a territory or possession of the United States; and the term “Federal law” excludes any State law. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2302. Rules governing contents of warranties<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Full and conspicuous disclosure of terms and conditions; additional requirements for contents </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In order to improve the adequacy of information available to consumers, prevent deception, and improve competition in the marketing of consumer products, any warrantor warranting a consumer product to a consumer by means of a written warranty shall, to the extent required by rules of the Commission, fully and conspicuously disclose in simple and readily understood language the terms and conditions of such warranty. Such rules may require inclusion in the written warranty of any of the following items among others: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The clear identification of the names and addresses of the warrantors. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The identity of the party or parties to whom the warranty is extended. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The products or parts covered. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(4)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">A statement of what the warrantor will do in the event of a defect, malfunction, or failure to conform with such written warranty—at whose expense—and for what period of time. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(5)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">A statement of what the consumer must do and expenses he must bear. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(6)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Exceptions and exclusions from the terms of the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(7)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The step-by-step procedure which the consumer should take in order to obtain performance of any obligation under the warranty, including the identification of any person or class of persons authorized to perform the obligations set forth in the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(8)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Information respecting the availability of any informal dispute settlement procedure offered by the warrantor and a recital, where the warranty so provides, that the purchaser may be required to resort to such procedure before pursuing any legal remedies in the courts. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(9)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">A brief, general description of the legal remedies available to the consumer. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(10)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The time at which the warrantor will perform any obligations under the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(11)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The period of time within which, after notice of a defect, malfunction, or failure to conform with the warranty, the warrantor will perform any obligations under the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(12)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The characteristics or properties of the products, or parts thereof, that are not covered by the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(13)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The elements of the warranty in words or phrases which would not mislead a reasonable, average consumer as to the nature or scope of the warranty. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Availability of terms to consumer; manner and form for presentation and display of information; duration; extension of period for written warranty or service contract </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">The Commission shall prescribe rules requiring that the terms of any written warranty on a consumer product be made available to the consumer (or prospective consumer) prior to the sale of the product to him. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">The Commission may prescribe rules for determining the manner and form in which information with respect to any written warranty of a consumer product shall be clearly and conspicuously presented or displayed so as not to mislead the reasonable, average consumer, when such information is contained in advertising, labeling, point-of-sale material, or other representations in writing. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Nothing in this chapter (other than paragraph (3) of this subsection) shall be deemed to authorize the Commission to prescribe the duration of written warranties given or to require that a consumer product or any of its components be warranted. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The Commission may prescribe rules for extending the period of time a written warranty or service contract is in effect to correspond with any period of time in excess of a reasonable period (not less than 10 days) during which the consumer is deprived of the use of such consumer product by reason of failure of the product to conform with the written warranty or by reason of the failure of the warrantor (or service contractor) to carry out such warranty (or service contract) within the period specified in the warranty (or service contract). </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Prohibition on conditions for written or implied warranty; waiver by Commission </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumer’s using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name; except that the prohibition of this subsection may be waived by the Commission if— <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">the warrantor satisfies the Commission that the warranted product will function properly only if the article or service so identified is used in connection with the warranted product, and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">the Commission finds that such a waiver is in the public interest. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The Commission shall identify in the Federal Register, and permit public comment on, all applications for waiver of the prohibition of this subsection, and shall publish in the Federal Register its disposition of any such application, including the reasons therefor. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(d)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Incorporation by reference of detailed substantive warranty provisions </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The Commission may by rule devise detailed substantive warranty provisions which warrantors may incorporate by reference in their warranties. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(e)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Applicability to consumer products costing more than $5 </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The provisions of this section apply only to warranties which pertain to consumer products actually costing the consumer more than $5. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2303. Designation of written warranties<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Full (statement of duration) or limited warranty </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Any warrantor warranting a consumer product by means of a written warranty shall clearly and conspicuously designate such warranty in the following manner, unless exempted from doing so by the Commission pursuant to subsection (c) of this section: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">If the written warranty meets the Federal minimum standards for warranty set forth in section 2304 of this title, then it shall be conspicuously designated a “full (statement of duration) warranty”. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">If the written warranty does not meet the Federal minimum standards for warranty set forth in section 2304 of this title, then it shall be conspicuously designated a “limited warranty”. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Applicability of requirements, standards, etc., to representations or statements of customer satisfaction </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This section and sections 2302 and 2304 of this title shall not apply to statements or representations which are similar to expressions of general policy concerning customer satisfaction and which are not subject to any specific limitations. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Exemptions by Commission </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In addition to exercising the authority pertaining to disclosure granted in section 2302 of this title, the Commission may by rule determine when a written warranty does not have to be designated either “full (statement of duration)” or “limited” in accordance with this section. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(d)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Applicability to consumer products costing more than $10 and not designated as full warranties </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The provisions of subsections (a) and (c) of this section apply only to warranties which pertain to consumer products actually costing the consumer more than $10 and which are not designated “full (statement of duration) warranties”. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2304. Federal minimum standards for warranties<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Remedies under written warranty; duration of implied warranty; exclusion or limitation on consequential damages for breach of written or implied warranty; election of refund or replacement </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In order for a warrantor warranting a consumer product by means of a written warranty to meet the Federal minimum standards for warranty— <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">such warrantor must as a minimum remedy such consumer product within a reasonable time and without charge, in the case of a defect, malfunction, or failure to conform with such written warranty; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">notwithstanding section 2308 (b) of this title, such warrantor may not impose any limitation on the duration of any implied warranty on the product; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">such warrantor may not exclude or limit consequential damages for breach of any written or implied warranty on such product, unless such exclusion or limitation conspicuously appears on the face of the warranty; and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(4)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">if the product (or a component part thereof) contains a defect or malfunction after a reasonable number of attempts by the warrantor to remedy defects or malfunctions in such product, such warrantor must permit the consumer to elect either a refund for, or replacement without charge of, such product or part (as the case may be). The Commission may by rule specify for purposes of this paragraph, what constitutes a reasonable number of attempts to remedy particular kinds of defects or malfunctions under different circumstances. If the warrantor replaces a component part of a consumer product, such replacement shall include installing the part in the product without charge. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Duties and conditions imposed on consumer by warrantor </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">In fulfilling the duties under subsection (a) of this section respecting a written warranty, the warrantor shall not impose any duty other than notification upon any consumer as a condition of securing remedy of any consumer product which malfunctions, is defective, or does not conform to the written warranty, unless the warrantor has demonstrated in a rulemaking proceeding, or can demonstrate in an administrative or judicial enforcement proceeding (including private enforcement), or in an informal dispute settlement proceeding, that such a duty is reasonable. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a warrantor may require, as a condition to replacement of, or refund for, any consumer product under subsection (a) of this section, that such consumer product shall be made available to the warrantor free and clear of liens and other encumbrances, except as otherwise provided by rule or order of the Commission in cases in which such a requirement would not be practicable. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The Commission may, by rule define in detail the duties set forth in subsection (a) of this section and the applicability of such duties to warrantors of different categories of consumer products with “full (statement of duration)” warranties. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(4)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The duties under subsection (a) of this section extend from the warrantor to each person who is a consumer with respect to the consumer product. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Waiver of standards </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The performance of the duties under subsection (a) of this section shall not be required of the warrantor if he can show that the defect, malfunction, or failure of any warranted consumer product to conform with a written warranty, was caused by damage (not resulting from defect or malfunction) while in the possession of the consumer, or unreasonable use (including failure to provide reasonable and necessary maintenance). <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(d)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Remedy without charge </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">For purposes of this section and of section 2302 (c) of this title, the term “without charge” means that the warrantor may not assess the consumer for any costs the warrantor or his representatives incur in connection with the required remedy of a warranted consumer product. An obligation under subsection (a)(1)(A) of this section to remedy without charge does not necessarily require the warrantor to compensate the consumer for incidental expenses; however, if any incidental expenses are incurred because the remedy is not made within a reasonable time or because the warrantor imposed an unreasonable duty upon the consumer as a condition of securing remedy, then the consumer shall be entitled to recover reasonable incidental expenses which are so incurred in any action against the warrantor. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(e)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Incorporation of standards to products designated with full warranty for purposes of judicial actions </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">If a supplier designates a warranty applicable to a consumer product as a “full (statement of duration)” warranty, then the warranty on such product shall, for purposes of any action under section 2310 (d) of this title or under any State law, be deemed to incorporate at least the minimum requirements of this section and rules prescribed under this section. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2305. Full and limited warranting of a consumer product<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit the selling of a consumer product which has both full and limited warranties if such warranties are clearly and conspicuously differentiated. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2306. Service contracts; rules for full, clear and conspicuous disclosure of terms and conditions; addition to or in lieu of written warranty<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">The Commission may prescribe by rule the manner and form in which the terms and conditions of service contracts shall be fully, clearly, and conspicuously disclosed. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-1">Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent a supplier or warrantor from entering into a service contract with the consumer in addition to or in lieu of a written warranty if such contract fully, clearly, and conspicuously discloses its terms and conditions in simple and readily understood language. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2307. Designation of representatives by warrantor to perform duties under written or implied warranty<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent any warrantor from designating representatives to perform duties under the written or implied warranty: Provided, That such warrantor shall make reasonable arrangements for compensation of such designated representatives, but no such designation shall relieve the warrantor of his direct responsibilities to the consumer or make the representative a cowarrantor. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2308. Implied warranties<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Restrictions on disclaimers or modifications </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">No supplier may disclaim or modify (except as provided in subsection (b) of this section) any implied warranty to a consumer with respect to such consumer product if <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">such supplier makes any written warranty to the consumer with respect to such consumer Product, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">at the time of sale, or within 90 days thereafter, such supplier enters into a service contract with the consumer which applies to such consumer product. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Limitation on duration </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">For purposes of this chapter (other than section 2304 (a)(2) of this title), implied warranties may be limited in duration to the duration of a written warranty of reasonable duration, if such limitation is conscionable and is set forth in clear and unmistakable language and prominently displayed on the face of the warranty. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Effectiveness of disclaimers, modifications, or limitations </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A disclaimer, modification, or limitation made in violation of this section shall be ineffective for purposes of this chapter and State law. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2309. Procedures applicable to promulgation of rules by Commission<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Oral presentation </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Any rule prescribed under this chapter shall be prescribed in accordance with section 553 of title 5; except that the Commission shall give interested persons an opportunity for oral presentations of data, views, and arguments, in addition to written submissions. A transcript shall be kept of any oral presentation. Any such rule shall be subject to judicial review under section 57a (e) of this title in the same manner as rules prescribed under section 57a (a)(1)(B) of this title, except that section 57a (e)(3)(B) of this title shall not apply. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Warranties and warranty practices involved in sale of used motor vehicles </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The Commission shall initiate within one year after January 4, 1975, a rulemaking proceeding dealing with warranties and warranty practices in connection with the sale of used motor vehicles; and, to the extent necessary to supplement the protections offered the consumer by this chapter, shall prescribe rules dealing with such warranties and practices. In prescribing rules under this subsection, the Commission may exercise any authority it may have under this chapter, or other law, and in addition it may require disclosure that a used motor vehicle is sold without any warranty and specify the form and content of such disclosure. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2310. Remedies in consumer disputes<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Informal dispute settlement procedures; establishment; rules setting forth minimum requirements; effect of compliance by warrantor; review of informal procedures or implementation by Commission; application to existing informal procedures </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Congress hereby declares it to be its policy to encourage warrantors to establish procedures whereby consumer disputes are fairly and expeditiously settled through informal dispute settlement mechanisms. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The Commission shall prescribe rules setting forth minimum requirements for any informal dispute settlement procedure which is incorporated into the terms of a written warranty to which any provision of this chapter applies. Such rules shall provide for participation in such procedure by independent or governmental entities. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">One or more warrantors may establish an informal dispute settlement procedure which meets the requirements of the Commission’s rules under paragraph (2). If— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">a warrantor establishes such a procedure, </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">such procedure, and its implementation, meets the requirements of such rules, and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(C)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">he incorporates in a written warranty a requirement that the consumer resort to such procedure before pursuing any legal remedy under this section respecting such warranty, </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">then <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(i)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-4">the consumer may not commence a civil action (other than a class action) under subsection (d) of this section unless he initially resorts to such procedure; and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(ii)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-4">a class of consumers may not proceed in a class action under subsection (d) of this section except to the extent the court determines necessary to establish the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs, unless the named plaintiffs (upon notifying the defendant that they are named plaintiffs in a class action with respect to a warranty obligation) initially resort to such procedure. In the case of such a class action which is brought in a district court of the United States, the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs shall be established in the application of rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In any civil action arising out of a warranty obligation and relating to a matter considered in such a procedure, any decision in such procedure shall be admissible in evidence. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(4)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The Commission on its own initiative may, or upon written complaint filed by any interested person shall, review the bona fide operation of any dispute settlement procedure resort to which is stated in a written warranty to be a prerequisite to pursuing a legal remedy under this section. If the Commission finds that such procedure or its implementation fails to comply with the requirements of the rules under paragraph (2), the Commission may take appropriate remedial action under any authority it may have under this chapter or any other provision of law. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(5)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Until rules under paragraph (2) take effect, this subsection shall not affect the validity of any informal dispute settlement procedure respecting consumer warranties, but in any action under subsection (d) of this section, the court may invalidate any such procedure if it finds that such procedure is unfair. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Prohibited acts </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">It shall be a violation of section 45 (a)(1) of this title for any person to fail to comply with any requirement imposed on such person by this chapter (or a rule thereunder) or to violate any prohibition contained in this chapter (or a rule thereunder). <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Injunction proceedings by Attorney General or Commission for deceptive warranty, noncompliance with requirements, or violating prohibitions; procedures; definitions </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of any action brought by the Attorney General (in his capacity as such), or by the Commission by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, to restrain </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">any warrantor from making a deceptive warranty with respect to a consumer product, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">any person from failing to comply with any requirement imposed on such person by or pursuant to this chapter or from violating any prohibition contained in this chapter. Upon proper showing that, weighing the equities and considering the Commission’s or Attorney General’s likelihood of ultimate success, such action would be in the public interest and after notice to the defendant, a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction may be granted without bond. In the case of an action brought by the Commission, if a complaint under section 45 of this title is not filed within such period (not exceeding 10 days) as may be specified by the court after the issuance of the temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, the order or injunction shall be dissolved by the court and be of no further force and effect. Any suit shall be brought in the district in which such person resides or transacts business. Whenever it appears to the court that the ends of justice require that other persons should be parties in the action, the court may cause them to be summoned whether or not they reside in the district in which the court is held, and to that end process may be served in any district. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">For the purposes of this subsection, the term “deceptive warranty” means </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">a written warranty which </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(i)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-4">contains an affirmation, promise, description, or representation which is either false or fraudulent, or which, in light of all of the circumstances, would mislead a reasonable individual exercising due care; or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(ii)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-4">fails to contain information which is necessary in light of all of the circumstances, to make the warranty not misleading to a reasonable individual exercising due care; or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">a written warranty created by the use of such terms as “guaranty” or “warranty”, if the terms and conditions of such warranty so limit its scope and application as to deceive a reasonable individual. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(d)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Civil action by consumer for damages, etc.; jurisdiction; recovery of costs and expenses; cognizable claims </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Subject to subsections (a)(3) and (e) of this section, a consumer who is damaged by the failure of a supplier, warrantor, or service contractor to comply with any obligation under this chapter, or under a written warranty, implied warranty, or service contract, may bring suit for damages and other legal and equitable relief— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">in any court of competent jurisdiction in any State or the District of Columbia; or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">in an appropriate district court of the United States, subject to paragraph (3) of this subsection. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">If a consumer finally prevails in any action brought under paragraph (1) of this subsection, he may be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of cost and expenses (including attorneys’ fees based on actual time expended) determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the plaintiff for or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action, unless the court in its discretion shall determine that such an award of attorneys’ fees would be inappropriate. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(3)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">No claim shall be cognizable in a suit brought under paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">if the amount in controversy of any individual claim is less than the sum or value of $25; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">if the amount in controversy is less than the sum or value of $50,000 (exclusive of interests and costs) computed on the basis of all claims to be determined in this suit; or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(C)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">if the action is brought as a class action, and the number of named plaintiffs is less than one hundred. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(e)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Class actions; conditions; procedures applicable </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">No action (other than a class action or an action respecting a warranty to which subsection (a)(3) of this section applies) may be brought under subsection (d) of this section for failure to comply with any obligation under any written or implied warranty or service contract, and a class of consumers may not proceed in a class action under such subsection with respect to such a failure except to the extent the court determines necessary to establish the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs, unless the person obligated under the warranty or service contract is afforded a reasonable opportunity to cure such failure to comply. In the case of such a class action (other than a class action respecting a warranty to which subsection (a)(3) of this section applies) brought under subsection (d) of this section for breach of any written or implied warranty or service contract, such reasonable opportunity will be afforded by the named plaintiffs and they shall at that time notify the defendant that they are acting on behalf of the class. In the case of such a class action which is brought in a district court of the United States, the representative capacity of the named plaintiffs shall be established in the application of rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(f)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Warrantors subject to enforcement of remedies </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">For purposes of this section, only the warrantor actually making a written affirmation of fact, promise, or undertaking shall be deemed to have created a written warranty, and any rights arising thereunder may be enforced under this section only against such warrantor and no other person. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2311. Applicability to other laws<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Federal Trade Commission Act and Federal Seed Act </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to repeal, invalidate, or supersede the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.] or any statute defined therein as an Antitrust Act. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to repeal, invalidate, or supersede the Federal Seed Act [7 U.S.C. 1551 et seq.] and nothing in this chapter shall apply to seed for planting. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Rights, remedies, and liabilities </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Nothing in this chapter shall invalidate or restrict any right or remedy of any consumer under State law or any other Federal law. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Nothing in this chapter (other than sections 2308 and 2304 (a)(2) and (4) of this title) shall </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">affect the liability of, or impose liability on, any person for personal injury, or </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">supersede any provision of State law regarding consequential damages for injury to the person or other injury. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>State warranty laws </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(1)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section and in paragraph (2) of this subsection, a State requirement— </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">which relates to labeling or disclosure with respect to written warranties or performance thereunder; </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">which is within the scope of an applicable requirement of sections 2302, 2303, and 2304 of this title (and rules implementing such sections), and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(C)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">which is not identical to a requirement of section 2302, 2303, or 2304 of this title (or a rule thereunder), </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">shall not be applicable to written warranties complying with such sections (or rules thereunder). <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(2)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-2">If, upon application of an appropriate State agency, the Commission determines (pursuant to rules issued in accordance with section 2309 of this title) that any requirement of such State covering any transaction to which this chapter applies </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(A)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">affords protection to consumers greater than the requirements of this chapter and </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumlstr"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(B)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span class="ptext-3">does not unduly burden interstate commerce, then such State requirement shall be applicable (notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1) of this subsection) to the extent specified in such determination for so long as the State administers and enforces effectively any such greater requirement. </span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(d)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Other Federal warranty laws </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This chapter (other than section 2302 (c) of this title) shall be inapplicable to any written warranty the making or content of which is otherwise governed by Federal law. If only a portion of a written warranty is so governed by Federal law, the remaining portion shall be subject to this chapter. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="catchline"><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">§ 2312. Effective dates<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(a)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Effective date of chapter </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, this chapter shall take effect 6 months after January 4, 1975, but shall not apply to consumer products manufactured prior to such date. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(b)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <b>Effective date of section 2302 (a) </b><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Section 2302 (a) of this title shall take effect 6 months after the final publication of rules respecting such section; except that the Commission, for good cause shown, may postpone the applicability of such sections until one year after such final publication in order to permit any designated classes of suppliers to bring their written warranties into compliance with rules promulgated pursuant to this chapter. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="enumbell"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(c)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <span style="font-size:100%;"><b>Promulgation of rules </b><o:p></o:p></span></span></p><span style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:12;"><span style="font-size:100%;">The Commission shall promulgate rules for initial implementation of this chapter as soon as possible after January 4, 1975, but in no event later than one year after such date.</span> </span><br />==================================================================<br /><br /><span style="font-family:verdana;">Visit our website: <span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></span></span><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The </span><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox Legal Group, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona and a limited number of other states.</span></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-116036955627739260?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [3]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-115168874242592878" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:26:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2006-06-30T10:42:15.836-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(117) "Custody and Access Rights of Grandparent and Non-Biologically Related Persons in Arizona: An Analysis of Current Law" ["description"]=> string(25326) "<div align="left"><em><span style="font-size:85%;">Custody and access rights of grandparents and other non-parents is a hot button topic in the family courts. Following the U.S. Supreme Court's Troxel decision, Arizona courts are forced to reevaluate the legal role and rights of non-parents when it comes to custody and access to children. Attorney Carrie Wilcox analyzes the impact of recent decsions.</span></em><br /><br />A. Overview<br /><br />Recent decisions in both federal and state courts affect custody and access rights of persons who are not the biological parents of children but with whom they have developed relationships. Affected persons include grandparents, stepparents and others who may have acted in the place of parents (in loco parentis).<br /><br />In Arizona, grandparents’ rights are codified in Arizona Revised Statute §25-409<a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_edn1" name="_ednref1">[i]</a> while A.R.S. §25-415<a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn2" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_edn2" name="_ednref2">[ii]</a> covers anyone who may have acted as a parent to a child. A.R.S. §25-415 could affect those grandparents who have actually raised a child and are seeking more than the visitation the grandparent rights statute provides. While the statutes themselves provide a starting point from which to assess the custody and access rights of any given person, appellate court interpretations of the statutes provide more insight. Most often, the appellate court analyzes statutes within a constitutional framework. While there have not been a tremendous number of cases decided that analyze the Arizona grandparent and in loco parentis cases, the few decisions that have been made are very important. The U.S. Supreme Court case of Troxel v. Granville remains the key controlling case on the non-parent issue and provides the backdrop against which non-parent cases are decided.<br /><br />B. Troxel v. Granville: The U.S. Supreme Court Weighs In<br /><br />The single most important case in recent years on the non-parent rights issue involves Jenifer Troxel, et vir v. Tommie Granville, 530 U.S. 57; 120 S. Ct. 2054; 147 L. Ed. 2d 49 (2000). The Troxel case originated in Washington state as a grandparent visitation dispute. In that case, the deceased biological father’s parents sought visitation under a Washington statute that allowed anyone to petition for visitation, whether biologically related or not. Although the biological mother agreed to visitation, she disputed the amount sought by the paternal grandparents and the dispute went before the Washington trial court. The trial court sided with the grandparents and the mother appealed through the Washington appellate system where the Washington Court of Appeals overturned the trial court’s visitation order and dismissed the grandparents’ visitation petition, a ruling affirmed by the Washington Supreme Court.<br /><br />Following the Washington Supreme Court’s decision against them, the grandparents appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court where they found an unfriendly audience. The U.S. Supreme Court analyzed both the Washington statute and the particular factual circumstances surrounding Troxel, ultimately finding that the U.S. Constitution provided more protection for parental decision-making rights than the Washington statute and trial court provided. The Court upheld the dismissal of the grandparents’ visitation petition and the visitation awarded by the trial court was not allowed.<br /><br />So, as one looks at the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Troxel, there are two key factors that the Court considered:<br /><br />1. Fourteenth Amendment Due Process<br />The Constitutional issue was the key issue of the appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Ultimately, the Court concluded that the Washington visitation statute that allowed anyone to petition for visitation and for the Washington trial courts to award visitation in the best interests of children who may be subject of a petition was simply overbroad and impermissibly infringed on parents’ fundamental right to raise their children as they see fit.<br /><br />2. Circumstances of the Case<br />The U.S. Supreme Court also reviewed the circumstances of the case; in other words the particular facts present in Troxel. For example, the mother in the case had actually offered visitation, just not to the extent sought by the grandparents. The Court concluded that the mother’s determination of what amounted to appropriate visitation was entitled to more weight than the trial court gave. In addition, there was no allegation that mother was an unfit parent, thus there was no apparent reason to second-guess the mother’s decisions.<br /><br />In summary, the Troxel case at its simplest stands for the principle that courts are to provide a fit parent’s decisions special weight.<br /><br />C. The Dodge Cases: Arizona’s Theory on Non-Parent Rights<br /><br />Arizona’s best-known case on the rights of non-parents is Dodge v. Graville. This highly contested litigation resulted in four appellate reviews and even made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Importantly, the Dodge cases were occurring at or near the time Troxel v. Granville was progressing through the courts. It is important, therefore, to maintain clarity within the various cases and proceedings in Dodge and thus, they are herein referred to in the order in which they were decided at the various appellate court levels. Courts and lawyers refer to Dodge I and Dodge II to keep them straight; two official published opinions resulted from the litigation that, at the end of the day, left a number of questions regarding Arizona law unanswered.<br /><br />1. Dodge I. (Kathryn Lucille Graville and Donald Graville, 195 Ariz. 119; 985 P.2d 604; 287 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 68 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999)).<br /><br />In this case, the mother of the children at issue was deceased and the maternal grandparents sought visitation. After the trial court awarded the grandparents the equivalent of nine days of annual visitation, the children’s father appealed on a number of bases.<br /><br />On appeal, the father argued that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides parents a fundamental right to raise their children as they wish and that Arizona’s grandparent visitation statute interferes with that right. Although the Arizona Court of Appeals agreed with the father that parents do have the fundamental right to raise their children as they see fit, the court felt that the statute was written and applied in such a way that the intrusion upon parental rights was not unconstitutional.<br /><br />The father also appealed the amount of time awarded to the grandparents. The court disposed of the father’s arguments by pointing out that the total amount of visitation time was relatively minor. The court did, however, agree with the father that the trial court’s orders that he encourage weekly telephone calls with the grandparents, consider using the grandparents as caregivers when possible and that he not discuss custody issues with the children went too far. Thus, those orders were stricken.<br /><br />2. Dodge II. (Kathryn Lucille and Donald Graville v. Douglas Paul Dodge, 197 Ariz. 591; 5 P.3d 925; 322 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 15 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000)).<br />In the continuing litigation regarding the Graville’s visitation, the grandparents sought to have the father found in contempt for not following the trial court’s original visitation orders. The Arizona Court of Appeals examined the issue of whether the trial court overstepped its authority by appointing a supervisor to monitor the visitation, determining that the addition of the supervisor was not an improper modification of the original order. However, this Court of Appeals decision occurred right before the U.S. Supreme Court decided Troxel. When the Arizona Supreme Court refused to review the case, the U.S. Supreme Court eventually vacated the Arizona Court of Appeals decision and sent the case back for review in light of the Troxel decision. See Jenifer Troxel, et vir v. Tommie Granville, 530 U.S. 57; 120 S. Ct. 2054; 147 L. Ed. 2d 49 (2000).<br /><br />Upon receiving the case back with instructions from the U.S. Supreme Court to apply the Troxel holding, the Arizona Court of Appeals chose to make both sides unhappy. The court did away with the grandparents’ requested contempt ruling, essentially, and the father’s constitutional issues went unresolved. Thus, important issues are left unclarified.<br /><br />D. Other Arizona Cases<br /><br />To make the length of this article workable, not every pertinent Arizona or national case is included or mentioned, however, the following cases are briefly addressed to provide more information on the subject of grandparent and non-parent visitation rights in Arizona.<br /><br />1. Jackson v. Tangreen, 199 Ariz. 306; 18 P.3d 100 (2000).<br /><br />The facts of this case were slightly different than most of the grandparent cases. Here, the biological father had voluntarily terminated his rights following his divorce from the mother so that the mother’s new husband could adopt the child. Following the adoption, the biological father’s mother petitioned to continue her visitation rights she had attained following the divorce but before the proceedings related to the adoption.<br /><br />The Court of Appeals ruled as follows:<br /><br />a. Upholding the grandparent visitation statute as constitutional, and<br />b. Finding that the grandparent visitation statute does not unconstitutionally distinguish between two-parent adoptions and stepparent adoptions by permitting grandparent visitation when a stepparent adopts a child.<br /><br />Note that the U.S. Supreme Court refused to review this case. 534 U.S. 953; 122 S. Ct. 351; (2001).<br /><br />2. Riepe v. Riepe, 208 Ariz. 90; 91 P.3d 312 (2004).<br /><br />The Riepe case involves a sad set of facts. The biological mother and father were divorced and eventually the father met, moved in with, and married the stepmother. The stepmother appears to have been very involved all aspects of the child’s life during the time she was with the father. In 2001, the father died in a traffic accident. Biological mother then denied visitation to the stepmother who petitioned for visitation under Arizona’s in loco parentis statute, A.R.S. §25-415. The trial court denied the stepmother’s petition for visitation and an appeal followed.<br /><br />The Arizona Court of Appeals overturned the trial court, finding that the trial court improperly required the stepmother to show that her relationship with the child was equal or superior to that of the natural parents. The appellate decision also contains a lengthy dissent and response to the dissent that takes up most of the decision.<br /><br />3. McGovern v. McGovern, 201 Ariz. 172; 33 P.3d 506 (2001).<br /><br />In this case, the child at issue was born out of wedlock and the biological father’s parental rights were terminated. The mother and child lived with the mother’s parents for approximately four and one-half years commencing soon after the child’s birth and it appeared from the evidence presented that a significant bond developed between the child and the maternal grandparents. Mother eventually moved the child and herself out of her parents’ home and, as in the Troxel case, offered visitation to the grandparents that was less than the grandparents preferred, prompting the grandparents to file a petition for visitation.<br /><br />Following the grandparents’ petition, a stipulated order was reached that provided the grandparents with visitation. Nevertheless, following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Troxel decision, the mother sought reconsideration and a declaratory judgment based on the Troxel ruling. The trial court then vacated the stipulated order for visitation and ordered that the mother would have complete discretion on all visitation matters. The grandparents then applied to the Arizona Court of Appeals for relief.<br /><br />On appeal, the court noted similarities between the McGovern’s case and Troxel. For example, the mother’s fitness was not challenged and she had offered some visitation. The Court of Appeals agreed in part and disagreed in part with the trial court’s rulings. Specifically, the Court of Appeals agreed that the trial court properly vacated the stipulated visitation order but disagreed that the mother should have 100% discretion on visitation, finding that the mother’s offer of limited visitation was only one factor to consider. The Court of Appeals remanded the case so that the trial court could hold additional proceedings on the visitation issue.<br /><br /><br />E. Conclusion<br /><br />The Troxel case is a landmark decision that has created waves of litigation in the states, even prompting a movement to have grandparent and in loco parentis statutes declared unconstitutional in many states. While Troxel has modified the way that Arizona trial and appellate courts view non-parent rights and how A.R.S. §§25-409 and 25-415 are interpreted, both statutes have withstood Constitutional challenges thus far and it appears that barring legislative action to the contrary, they are likely to remain in effect. Therefore, non-parents still enjoy certain rights in Arizona, although seemingly not to the extent that they did before the U.S. Supreme Court decided Troxel.<br /><br />_______________<br /><br /><br />*Attorney Carrie M. Wilcox is the sole shareholder of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C., a multi-dimensional law firm with offices in Arizona and California. She is a graduate of Arizona State College of Law where she was a Note and Comment Editor for the Arizona State University Law Journal and former intern for the Honorable Rudolph Gerber, Arizona Court of Appeals. Ms. Wilcox is admitted to practice in the Arizona state courts and federal district court. Ms. Wilcox practices in the areas of <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/az-small-business-law.html">business formation</a> and <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/debt-collection-attorney.html">creditor rights/debt collection</a>. She also has wide-ranging experience in civil litigation, including <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/employment-attorney.html">employment law</a>, <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/phoenix-az-family-law.html">family law</a>, <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/arizona-personal-injury-attorney.html">personal injury</a> and <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/az-small-business-law.html">business representation</a>. Ms. Wilcox is a member of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA),the Maricopa County Bar Associations, State Bar of Arizona, Arizona Women Lawyers and American Bar Association. Ms. Wilcox is also a former instructor at the Arizona Paralegal Training Institute, where she lectured on various subjects including business formation and litigation, employment law and dissolution of marriage. She has also co-chaired seminars for other attorneys on divorce procedure on behalf of the Lorman Institute.<br /><br /></div><div align="center">___________</div><br /><br /><div align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"><strong></strong></span></div><div align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"><strong>APPENDIX OF CASES</strong></span><br /><br />(full text of cases available at <em><u>www.wilcoxlegal.com</u></em>)<br /><br /><br />a. Jenifer Troxel, et vir v. Tommie Granville, 530 U.S. 57; 120 S. Ct. 2054; 147 L. Ed. 2d 49 (2000).<br /><br />b. Kathryn Lucille Graville and Donald Graville, 195 Ariz. 119; 985 P.2d 604; 287 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 68 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999)<br /><br />c. Kathryn Lucille and Donald Graville v. Douglas Paul Dodge, 197 Ariz. 591; 5 P.3d 925; 322 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 15 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).<br /><br />d. Jackson v. Tangreen, 199 Ariz. 306; 18 P.3d 100 (2000).<br /><br />e. Riepe v. Riepe, 208 Ariz. 90; 91 P.3d 312 (2004).<br /><br />f. McGovern v. McGovern, 201 Ariz. 172; 33 P.3d 506 (2001).</div><div align="left"></div><div align="left"></div><div align="center">_____________</div><div align="left"></div><div align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></div><div align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></div><div align="center"><span style="font-size:130%;">ENDNOTES</span> </div><div align="left"></div><div align="left"><br /><a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_ednref1" name="_edn1">[i]</a> 25-409. Visitation rights of grandparents and great-grandparents<br /><br />A. The superior court may grant the grandparents of the child reasonable visitation rights to the child during the child's minority on a finding that the visitation rights would be in the best interests of the child and any of the following is true:<br />1. The marriage of the parents of the child has been dissolved for at least three months.<br />2. A parent of the child has been deceased or has been missing for at least three months. For the purposes of this paragraph, a parent is considered to be missing if the parent's location has not been determined and the parent has been reported as missing to a law enforcement agency.<br />3. The child was born out of wedlock.<br />B. The superior court may grant the great-grandparents of the child reasonable visitation rights on a finding that the great-grandparents would be entitled to such rights under subsection A if the great-grandparents were grandparents of the child.<br />C. In determining the child's best interests the court shall consider all relevant factors, including:<br />1. The historical relationship, if any, between the child and the person seeking visitation.<br />2. The motivation of the requesting party in seeking visitation.<br />3. The motivation of the person denying visitation.<br />4. The quantity of visitation time requested and the potential adverse impact that visitation will have on the child's customary activities.<br />5. If one or both of the child's parents are dead, the benefit in maintaining an extended family relationship.<br />D. If logistically possible and appropriate the court shall order visitation by a grandparent or great-grandparent to occur when the child is residing or spending time with the parent through whom the grandparent or great-grandparent claims a right of access to the child. If a parent is unable to have the child reside or spend time with that parent, the court shall order visitation by a grandparent or great-grandparent to occur when that parent would have had that opportunity.<br />E. A grandparent or great-grandparent seeking to obtain visitation rights under this section shall petition for these rights in the same action in which the parents had their marriage dissolved or in which the court determined paternity or maternity, or by a separate action in the county where the child resides if no action has been filed or the court entering the decree of dissolution or determination of paternity or maternity no longer has jurisdiction.<br />F. All visitation rights granted under this section automatically terminate if the child has been adopted or placed for adoption. If the child is removed from an adoptive placement, the court may reinstate the visitation rights. This subsection does not apply to the adoption of the child by the spouse of a natural parent if the natural parent remarries.<br /><br /><a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn2" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_ednref2" name="_edn2">[ii]</a> 25-415. Custody by nonparent; presumption; grounds; definitions<br /><br />A. A child custody proceeding may also be commenced in the superior court by a person other than a legal parent by filing a verified petition, or by a petition supported by an affidavit, in the county in which the child is permanently resident or is found. The petition shall include detailed facts supporting the petitioner's right to file the petition. The petitioner shall provide notice as required by subsection E. Notice shall include a copy of the petition and any affidavits. The court shall summarily deny a petition unless it finds that the petitioner by the pleadings established that all of the following are true:<br />1. The person filing the petition stands in loco parentis to the child.<br />2. It would be significantly detrimental to the child to remain or be placed in the custody of either of the child's living legal parents who wish to retain or obtain custody.<br />3. A court of competent jurisdiction has not entered or approved an order concerning the child's custody within one year before the person filed a petition pursuant to this section, unless there is reason to believe the child's present environment may seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.<br />4. One of the following applies:<br />(a) One of the legal parents is deceased.<br />(b) The child's legal parents are not married to each other at the time the petition is filed.<br />(c) There is a pending proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the legal parents at the time the petition is filed.<br />B. If a person other than a child's legal parent is seeking custody there is a rebuttable presumption that it is in the child's best interest to award custody to a legal parent because of the physical, psychological and emotional needs of the child to be reared by the child's legal parent. To rebut this presumption that person must show by clear and convincing evidence that awarding custody to a legal parent is not in the child's best interests.<br />C. The superior court may grant a person who stands in loco parentis to a child, including grandparents and great-grandparents, who meet the requirements of section 25-409 reasonable visitation rights to the child on a finding that the visitation is in the child's best interests and that any of the following is true:<br />1. One of the legal parents is deceased or has been missing at least three months.<br />2. The child's legal parents are not married to each other at the time the petition is filed.<br />3. There is a pending proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the legal parents at the time the petition is filed.<br />D. A grandparent, a great-grandparent or a person who stands in loco parentis to a child may bring a proceeding for visitation rights with a child by filing a verified petition in the county in which the child is permanently resident or is found.<br />E. Notice of a custody or visitation proceeding filed pursuant to this section shall be served pursuant to the rules of civil procedure to all of the following:<br />1. The child's parents.<br />2. A person who has court ordered custody or visitation rights.<br />3. The child's guardian or guardian ad litem.<br />4. A person or agency that has physical custody of the child or that claims to have custody or visitation rights.<br />5. Any other person or agency that has previously appeared in the action.<br />F. A person shall file proceedings for custody or visitation under this chapter in the same action in which the legal parents had their marriage dissolved or any other proceeding in which a previous custody order has been entered regarding the child.<br />G. For the purposes of this chapter:<br />1. "In loco parentis" means a person who has been treated as a parent by the child and who has formed a meaningful parental relationship with the child for a substantial period of time.<br />2. "Legal parent" means a biological or adoptive parent whose parental rights have not been terminated.<br /><br /><br /></div><strong>The Wilcox Legal Group, P.C.<br />Carrie Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u>www.wilcoxlegal.com</u></span></em><br /></strong><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-115168874242592878?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(78) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2006/06/custody-and-access-rights-of.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(25326) "<div align="left"><em><span style="font-size:85%;">Custody and access rights of grandparents and other non-parents is a hot button topic in the family courts. Following the U.S. Supreme Court's Troxel decision, Arizona courts are forced to reevaluate the legal role and rights of non-parents when it comes to custody and access to children. Attorney Carrie Wilcox analyzes the impact of recent decsions.</span></em><br /><br />A. Overview<br /><br />Recent decisions in both federal and state courts affect custody and access rights of persons who are not the biological parents of children but with whom they have developed relationships. Affected persons include grandparents, stepparents and others who may have acted in the place of parents (in loco parentis).<br /><br />In Arizona, grandparents’ rights are codified in Arizona Revised Statute §25-409<a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_edn1" name="_ednref1">[i]</a> while A.R.S. §25-415<a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn2" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_edn2" name="_ednref2">[ii]</a> covers anyone who may have acted as a parent to a child. A.R.S. §25-415 could affect those grandparents who have actually raised a child and are seeking more than the visitation the grandparent rights statute provides. While the statutes themselves provide a starting point from which to assess the custody and access rights of any given person, appellate court interpretations of the statutes provide more insight. Most often, the appellate court analyzes statutes within a constitutional framework. While there have not been a tremendous number of cases decided that analyze the Arizona grandparent and in loco parentis cases, the few decisions that have been made are very important. The U.S. Supreme Court case of Troxel v. Granville remains the key controlling case on the non-parent issue and provides the backdrop against which non-parent cases are decided.<br /><br />B. Troxel v. Granville: The U.S. Supreme Court Weighs In<br /><br />The single most important case in recent years on the non-parent rights issue involves Jenifer Troxel, et vir v. Tommie Granville, 530 U.S. 57; 120 S. Ct. 2054; 147 L. Ed. 2d 49 (2000). The Troxel case originated in Washington state as a grandparent visitation dispute. In that case, the deceased biological father’s parents sought visitation under a Washington statute that allowed anyone to petition for visitation, whether biologically related or not. Although the biological mother agreed to visitation, she disputed the amount sought by the paternal grandparents and the dispute went before the Washington trial court. The trial court sided with the grandparents and the mother appealed through the Washington appellate system where the Washington Court of Appeals overturned the trial court’s visitation order and dismissed the grandparents’ visitation petition, a ruling affirmed by the Washington Supreme Court.<br /><br />Following the Washington Supreme Court’s decision against them, the grandparents appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court where they found an unfriendly audience. The U.S. Supreme Court analyzed both the Washington statute and the particular factual circumstances surrounding Troxel, ultimately finding that the U.S. Constitution provided more protection for parental decision-making rights than the Washington statute and trial court provided. The Court upheld the dismissal of the grandparents’ visitation petition and the visitation awarded by the trial court was not allowed.<br /><br />So, as one looks at the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Troxel, there are two key factors that the Court considered:<br /><br />1. Fourteenth Amendment Due Process<br />The Constitutional issue was the key issue of the appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Ultimately, the Court concluded that the Washington visitation statute that allowed anyone to petition for visitation and for the Washington trial courts to award visitation in the best interests of children who may be subject of a petition was simply overbroad and impermissibly infringed on parents’ fundamental right to raise their children as they see fit.<br /><br />2. Circumstances of the Case<br />The U.S. Supreme Court also reviewed the circumstances of the case; in other words the particular facts present in Troxel. For example, the mother in the case had actually offered visitation, just not to the extent sought by the grandparents. The Court concluded that the mother’s determination of what amounted to appropriate visitation was entitled to more weight than the trial court gave. In addition, there was no allegation that mother was an unfit parent, thus there was no apparent reason to second-guess the mother’s decisions.<br /><br />In summary, the Troxel case at its simplest stands for the principle that courts are to provide a fit parent’s decisions special weight.<br /><br />C. The Dodge Cases: Arizona’s Theory on Non-Parent Rights<br /><br />Arizona’s best-known case on the rights of non-parents is Dodge v. Graville. This highly contested litigation resulted in four appellate reviews and even made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Importantly, the Dodge cases were occurring at or near the time Troxel v. Granville was progressing through the courts. It is important, therefore, to maintain clarity within the various cases and proceedings in Dodge and thus, they are herein referred to in the order in which they were decided at the various appellate court levels. Courts and lawyers refer to Dodge I and Dodge II to keep them straight; two official published opinions resulted from the litigation that, at the end of the day, left a number of questions regarding Arizona law unanswered.<br /><br />1. Dodge I. (Kathryn Lucille Graville and Donald Graville, 195 Ariz. 119; 985 P.2d 604; 287 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 68 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999)).<br /><br />In this case, the mother of the children at issue was deceased and the maternal grandparents sought visitation. After the trial court awarded the grandparents the equivalent of nine days of annual visitation, the children’s father appealed on a number of bases.<br /><br />On appeal, the father argued that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides parents a fundamental right to raise their children as they wish and that Arizona’s grandparent visitation statute interferes with that right. Although the Arizona Court of Appeals agreed with the father that parents do have the fundamental right to raise their children as they see fit, the court felt that the statute was written and applied in such a way that the intrusion upon parental rights was not unconstitutional.<br /><br />The father also appealed the amount of time awarded to the grandparents. The court disposed of the father’s arguments by pointing out that the total amount of visitation time was relatively minor. The court did, however, agree with the father that the trial court’s orders that he encourage weekly telephone calls with the grandparents, consider using the grandparents as caregivers when possible and that he not discuss custody issues with the children went too far. Thus, those orders were stricken.<br /><br />2. Dodge II. (Kathryn Lucille and Donald Graville v. Douglas Paul Dodge, 197 Ariz. 591; 5 P.3d 925; 322 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 15 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000)).<br />In the continuing litigation regarding the Graville’s visitation, the grandparents sought to have the father found in contempt for not following the trial court’s original visitation orders. The Arizona Court of Appeals examined the issue of whether the trial court overstepped its authority by appointing a supervisor to monitor the visitation, determining that the addition of the supervisor was not an improper modification of the original order. However, this Court of Appeals decision occurred right before the U.S. Supreme Court decided Troxel. When the Arizona Supreme Court refused to review the case, the U.S. Supreme Court eventually vacated the Arizona Court of Appeals decision and sent the case back for review in light of the Troxel decision. See Jenifer Troxel, et vir v. Tommie Granville, 530 U.S. 57; 120 S. Ct. 2054; 147 L. Ed. 2d 49 (2000).<br /><br />Upon receiving the case back with instructions from the U.S. Supreme Court to apply the Troxel holding, the Arizona Court of Appeals chose to make both sides unhappy. The court did away with the grandparents’ requested contempt ruling, essentially, and the father’s constitutional issues went unresolved. Thus, important issues are left unclarified.<br /><br />D. Other Arizona Cases<br /><br />To make the length of this article workable, not every pertinent Arizona or national case is included or mentioned, however, the following cases are briefly addressed to provide more information on the subject of grandparent and non-parent visitation rights in Arizona.<br /><br />1. Jackson v. Tangreen, 199 Ariz. 306; 18 P.3d 100 (2000).<br /><br />The facts of this case were slightly different than most of the grandparent cases. Here, the biological father had voluntarily terminated his rights following his divorce from the mother so that the mother’s new husband could adopt the child. Following the adoption, the biological father’s mother petitioned to continue her visitation rights she had attained following the divorce but before the proceedings related to the adoption.<br /><br />The Court of Appeals ruled as follows:<br /><br />a. Upholding the grandparent visitation statute as constitutional, and<br />b. Finding that the grandparent visitation statute does not unconstitutionally distinguish between two-parent adoptions and stepparent adoptions by permitting grandparent visitation when a stepparent adopts a child.<br /><br />Note that the U.S. Supreme Court refused to review this case. 534 U.S. 953; 122 S. Ct. 351; (2001).<br /><br />2. Riepe v. Riepe, 208 Ariz. 90; 91 P.3d 312 (2004).<br /><br />The Riepe case involves a sad set of facts. The biological mother and father were divorced and eventually the father met, moved in with, and married the stepmother. The stepmother appears to have been very involved all aspects of the child’s life during the time she was with the father. In 2001, the father died in a traffic accident. Biological mother then denied visitation to the stepmother who petitioned for visitation under Arizona’s in loco parentis statute, A.R.S. §25-415. The trial court denied the stepmother’s petition for visitation and an appeal followed.<br /><br />The Arizona Court of Appeals overturned the trial court, finding that the trial court improperly required the stepmother to show that her relationship with the child was equal or superior to that of the natural parents. The appellate decision also contains a lengthy dissent and response to the dissent that takes up most of the decision.<br /><br />3. McGovern v. McGovern, 201 Ariz. 172; 33 P.3d 506 (2001).<br /><br />In this case, the child at issue was born out of wedlock and the biological father’s parental rights were terminated. The mother and child lived with the mother’s parents for approximately four and one-half years commencing soon after the child’s birth and it appeared from the evidence presented that a significant bond developed between the child and the maternal grandparents. Mother eventually moved the child and herself out of her parents’ home and, as in the Troxel case, offered visitation to the grandparents that was less than the grandparents preferred, prompting the grandparents to file a petition for visitation.<br /><br />Following the grandparents’ petition, a stipulated order was reached that provided the grandparents with visitation. Nevertheless, following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Troxel decision, the mother sought reconsideration and a declaratory judgment based on the Troxel ruling. The trial court then vacated the stipulated order for visitation and ordered that the mother would have complete discretion on all visitation matters. The grandparents then applied to the Arizona Court of Appeals for relief.<br /><br />On appeal, the court noted similarities between the McGovern’s case and Troxel. For example, the mother’s fitness was not challenged and she had offered some visitation. The Court of Appeals agreed in part and disagreed in part with the trial court’s rulings. Specifically, the Court of Appeals agreed that the trial court properly vacated the stipulated visitation order but disagreed that the mother should have 100% discretion on visitation, finding that the mother’s offer of limited visitation was only one factor to consider. The Court of Appeals remanded the case so that the trial court could hold additional proceedings on the visitation issue.<br /><br /><br />E. Conclusion<br /><br />The Troxel case is a landmark decision that has created waves of litigation in the states, even prompting a movement to have grandparent and in loco parentis statutes declared unconstitutional in many states. While Troxel has modified the way that Arizona trial and appellate courts view non-parent rights and how A.R.S. §§25-409 and 25-415 are interpreted, both statutes have withstood Constitutional challenges thus far and it appears that barring legislative action to the contrary, they are likely to remain in effect. Therefore, non-parents still enjoy certain rights in Arizona, although seemingly not to the extent that they did before the U.S. Supreme Court decided Troxel.<br /><br />_______________<br /><br /><br />*Attorney Carrie M. Wilcox is the sole shareholder of Wilcox Legal Group, P.C., a multi-dimensional law firm with offices in Arizona and California. She is a graduate of Arizona State College of Law where she was a Note and Comment Editor for the Arizona State University Law Journal and former intern for the Honorable Rudolph Gerber, Arizona Court of Appeals. Ms. Wilcox is admitted to practice in the Arizona state courts and federal district court. Ms. Wilcox practices in the areas of <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/az-small-business-law.html">business formation</a> and <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/debt-collection-attorney.html">creditor rights/debt collection</a>. She also has wide-ranging experience in civil litigation, including <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/employment-attorney.html">employment law</a>, <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/phoenix-az-family-law.html">family law</a>, <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/arizona-personal-injury-attorney.html">personal injury</a> and <a href="http://wilcoxlegal.com/phoenix-law-firm-practice-areas/az-small-business-law.html">business representation</a>. Ms. Wilcox is a member of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA),the Maricopa County Bar Associations, State Bar of Arizona, Arizona Women Lawyers and American Bar Association. Ms. Wilcox is also a former instructor at the Arizona Paralegal Training Institute, where she lectured on various subjects including business formation and litigation, employment law and dissolution of marriage. She has also co-chaired seminars for other attorneys on divorce procedure on behalf of the Lorman Institute.<br /><br /></div><div align="center">___________</div><br /><br /><div align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"><strong></strong></span></div><div align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"><strong>APPENDIX OF CASES</strong></span><br /><br />(full text of cases available at <em><u>www.wilcoxlegal.com</u></em>)<br /><br /><br />a. Jenifer Troxel, et vir v. Tommie Granville, 530 U.S. 57; 120 S. Ct. 2054; 147 L. Ed. 2d 49 (2000).<br /><br />b. Kathryn Lucille Graville and Donald Graville, 195 Ariz. 119; 985 P.2d 604; 287 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 68 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999)<br /><br />c. Kathryn Lucille and Donald Graville v. Douglas Paul Dodge, 197 Ariz. 591; 5 P.3d 925; 322 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 15 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).<br /><br />d. Jackson v. Tangreen, 199 Ariz. 306; 18 P.3d 100 (2000).<br /><br />e. Riepe v. Riepe, 208 Ariz. 90; 91 P.3d 312 (2004).<br /><br />f. McGovern v. McGovern, 201 Ariz. 172; 33 P.3d 506 (2001).</div><div align="left"></div><div align="left"></div><div align="center">_____________</div><div align="left"></div><div align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></div><div align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></div><div align="center"><span style="font-size:130%;">ENDNOTES</span> </div><div align="left"></div><div align="left"><br /><a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_ednref1" name="_edn1">[i]</a> 25-409. Visitation rights of grandparents and great-grandparents<br /><br />A. The superior court may grant the grandparents of the child reasonable visitation rights to the child during the child's minority on a finding that the visitation rights would be in the best interests of the child and any of the following is true:<br />1. The marriage of the parents of the child has been dissolved for at least three months.<br />2. A parent of the child has been deceased or has been missing for at least three months. For the purposes of this paragraph, a parent is considered to be missing if the parent's location has not been determined and the parent has been reported as missing to a law enforcement agency.<br />3. The child was born out of wedlock.<br />B. The superior court may grant the great-grandparents of the child reasonable visitation rights on a finding that the great-grandparents would be entitled to such rights under subsection A if the great-grandparents were grandparents of the child.<br />C. In determining the child's best interests the court shall consider all relevant factors, including:<br />1. The historical relationship, if any, between the child and the person seeking visitation.<br />2. The motivation of the requesting party in seeking visitation.<br />3. The motivation of the person denying visitation.<br />4. The quantity of visitation time requested and the potential adverse impact that visitation will have on the child's customary activities.<br />5. If one or both of the child's parents are dead, the benefit in maintaining an extended family relationship.<br />D. If logistically possible and appropriate the court shall order visitation by a grandparent or great-grandparent to occur when the child is residing or spending time with the parent through whom the grandparent or great-grandparent claims a right of access to the child. If a parent is unable to have the child reside or spend time with that parent, the court shall order visitation by a grandparent or great-grandparent to occur when that parent would have had that opportunity.<br />E. A grandparent or great-grandparent seeking to obtain visitation rights under this section shall petition for these rights in the same action in which the parents had their marriage dissolved or in which the court determined paternity or maternity, or by a separate action in the county where the child resides if no action has been filed or the court entering the decree of dissolution or determination of paternity or maternity no longer has jurisdiction.<br />F. All visitation rights granted under this section automatically terminate if the child has been adopted or placed for adoption. If the child is removed from an adoptive placement, the court may reinstate the visitation rights. This subsection does not apply to the adoption of the child by the spouse of a natural parent if the natural parent remarries.<br /><br /><a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn2" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_ednref2" name="_edn2">[ii]</a> 25-415. Custody by nonparent; presumption; grounds; definitions<br /><br />A. A child custody proceeding may also be commenced in the superior court by a person other than a legal parent by filing a verified petition, or by a petition supported by an affidavit, in the county in which the child is permanently resident or is found. The petition shall include detailed facts supporting the petitioner's right to file the petition. The petitioner shall provide notice as required by subsection E. Notice shall include a copy of the petition and any affidavits. The court shall summarily deny a petition unless it finds that the petitioner by the pleadings established that all of the following are true:<br />1. The person filing the petition stands in loco parentis to the child.<br />2. It would be significantly detrimental to the child to remain or be placed in the custody of either of the child's living legal parents who wish to retain or obtain custody.<br />3. A court of competent jurisdiction has not entered or approved an order concerning the child's custody within one year before the person filed a petition pursuant to this section, unless there is reason to believe the child's present environment may seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.<br />4. One of the following applies:<br />(a) One of the legal parents is deceased.<br />(b) The child's legal parents are not married to each other at the time the petition is filed.<br />(c) There is a pending proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the legal parents at the time the petition is filed.<br />B. If a person other than a child's legal parent is seeking custody there is a rebuttable presumption that it is in the child's best interest to award custody to a legal parent because of the physical, psychological and emotional needs of the child to be reared by the child's legal parent. To rebut this presumption that person must show by clear and convincing evidence that awarding custody to a legal parent is not in the child's best interests.<br />C. The superior court may grant a person who stands in loco parentis to a child, including grandparents and great-grandparents, who meet the requirements of section 25-409 reasonable visitation rights to the child on a finding that the visitation is in the child's best interests and that any of the following is true:<br />1. One of the legal parents is deceased or has been missing at least three months.<br />2. The child's legal parents are not married to each other at the time the petition is filed.<br />3. There is a pending proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the legal parents at the time the petition is filed.<br />D. A grandparent, a great-grandparent or a person who stands in loco parentis to a child may bring a proceeding for visitation rights with a child by filing a verified petition in the county in which the child is permanently resident or is found.<br />E. Notice of a custody or visitation proceeding filed pursuant to this section shall be served pursuant to the rules of civil procedure to all of the following:<br />1. The child's parents.<br />2. A person who has court ordered custody or visitation rights.<br />3. The child's guardian or guardian ad litem.<br />4. A person or agency that has physical custody of the child or that claims to have custody or visitation rights.<br />5. Any other person or agency that has previously appeared in the action.<br />F. A person shall file proceedings for custody or visitation under this chapter in the same action in which the legal parents had their marriage dissolved or any other proceeding in which a previous custody order has been entered regarding the child.<br />G. For the purposes of this chapter:<br />1. "In loco parentis" means a person who has been treated as a parent by the child and who has formed a meaningful parental relationship with the child for a substantial period of time.<br />2. "Legal parent" means a biological or adoptive parent whose parental rights have not been terminated.<br /><br /><br /></div><strong>The Wilcox Legal Group, P.C.<br />Carrie Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u>www.wilcoxlegal.com</u></span></em><br /></strong><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-115168874242592878?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [4]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-113407767339059184" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:56:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-12-08T14:48:51.693-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(14) "Identity Theft" ["description"]=> string(5552) "<span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Paralegal Beth Rees at the firm prepared the following identity theft article for our client newsletter. I thought it could be of interest so I reprint it here.</strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><em><strong><u><span style="font-family:verdana;color:#000099;">Identity Theft</span></u></strong></em><br /><u><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;"></span></u><br /><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;">It’s beginning to look a lot like . . . well, like the winter holidays, with all the gift-giving and –receiving opportunities that abound. Gift lists grow ever-longer and more specific, and the giver’s thoughts turn to long hours and longer lines at the mall, fighting for this year’s version of the last Furby or Cabbage Patch Doll on the shelf. Wouldn’t it be easier to log onto the Web and shop in your jammies, humming along with your Christmas tapes? But what about identity theft? Could you unwittingly be handing over your life to some scammer?<br /><br />It is possible—but not as likely as the hype may lead you to believe. In the report prepared for the Federal Trade Commission in 2003 by Synovate</span><a title="" style="mso-footnote-id: ftn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;">[1]</span></a><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;">, approximately 4.6 percent of the population experienced some form of identity theft in 2002. In the same report, it was determined that in twenty-five percent of all identity thefts reported, the thief obtained the information through theft of a purse or wallet.<br /><br />So your chances of experiencing any form of identity theft are one chance in twenty. And if you are one of the unlucky ones, you have a one in four chance of having been taken when someone lifted your wallet or purse.<br /><br />How else does your information get captured? Do you shred your credit card statements, or do you just toss them in the garbage? If you leave them whole, that gives a thief your name, address, and account number. If you put them in a desk drawer, someone could remove them from that drawer. And do you know where the waiter goes with your credit card when he goes to swipe it? Are you sure he’s not making notes on a post-it, just in case he feels your tip is too small? There’s more to identity theft than the Internet.<br /><br />What do you do when you realize that something’s gone wrong? For most people, the main concern is with misuse of an existing credit card account. With good reason too—according to Synovate’s 2003 report, misuse of an existing card accounts for over half the incidents of reported identity theft.<br /><br />First and foremost, report the loss or theft of a credit card to the issuer immediately. This can limit your liability dramatically, often to a cap of $50.00 per card. Close any accounts you know were tampered with and open new accounts with new passwords. Don’t choose something obvious like a string of consecutive numbers, your mother’s maiden name, parts of your Social Security Number, or names of children or pets. Then file complaints with your local police and with the Federal Trade Commission. Finally, place a fraud alert on your credit report.<br /><br />Speaking of credit reports, they are one of the best tools for making sure accounts are not being opened in your name without your knowledge. You are entitled to one free credit report every twelve months—just for asking. Peace of mind makes a nice holiday gift to yourself.<br /></span><br /><a title="" style="mso-footnote-id: ftn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1"><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;">[1]</span></a><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;"> Available at http://www.consumer.gov/idtheft/id_federal.htm</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></u></span></em></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-113407767339059184?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(64) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/12/identity-theft.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(5552) "<span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Paralegal Beth Rees at the firm prepared the following identity theft article for our client newsletter. I thought it could be of interest so I reprint it here.</strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><em><strong><u><span style="font-family:verdana;color:#000099;">Identity Theft</span></u></strong></em><br /><u><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;"></span></u><br /><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;">It’s beginning to look a lot like . . . well, like the winter holidays, with all the gift-giving and –receiving opportunities that abound. Gift lists grow ever-longer and more specific, and the giver’s thoughts turn to long hours and longer lines at the mall, fighting for this year’s version of the last Furby or Cabbage Patch Doll on the shelf. Wouldn’t it be easier to log onto the Web and shop in your jammies, humming along with your Christmas tapes? But what about identity theft? Could you unwittingly be handing over your life to some scammer?<br /><br />It is possible—but not as likely as the hype may lead you to believe. In the report prepared for the Federal Trade Commission in 2003 by Synovate</span><a title="" style="mso-footnote-id: ftn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;">[1]</span></a><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;">, approximately 4.6 percent of the population experienced some form of identity theft in 2002. In the same report, it was determined that in twenty-five percent of all identity thefts reported, the thief obtained the information through theft of a purse or wallet.<br /><br />So your chances of experiencing any form of identity theft are one chance in twenty. And if you are one of the unlucky ones, you have a one in four chance of having been taken when someone lifted your wallet or purse.<br /><br />How else does your information get captured? Do you shred your credit card statements, or do you just toss them in the garbage? If you leave them whole, that gives a thief your name, address, and account number. If you put them in a desk drawer, someone could remove them from that drawer. And do you know where the waiter goes with your credit card when he goes to swipe it? Are you sure he’s not making notes on a post-it, just in case he feels your tip is too small? There’s more to identity theft than the Internet.<br /><br />What do you do when you realize that something’s gone wrong? For most people, the main concern is with misuse of an existing credit card account. With good reason too—according to Synovate’s 2003 report, misuse of an existing card accounts for over half the incidents of reported identity theft.<br /><br />First and foremost, report the loss or theft of a credit card to the issuer immediately. This can limit your liability dramatically, often to a cap of $50.00 per card. Close any accounts you know were tampered with and open new accounts with new passwords. Don’t choose something obvious like a string of consecutive numbers, your mother’s maiden name, parts of your Social Security Number, or names of children or pets. Then file complaints with your local police and with the Federal Trade Commission. Finally, place a fraud alert on your credit report.<br /><br />Speaking of credit reports, they are one of the best tools for making sure accounts are not being opened in your name without your knowledge. You are entitled to one free credit report every twelve months—just for asking. Peace of mind makes a nice holiday gift to yourself.<br /></span><br /><a title="" style="mso-footnote-id: ftn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=9346767#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1"><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;">[1]</span></a><span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;color:#000099;"> Available at http://www.consumer.gov/idtheft/id_federal.htm</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></u></span></em></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-113407767339059184?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [5]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-113157576507713839" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Wed, 09 Nov 2005 21:52:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-11-09T15:40:01.996-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(41) "What If I Don't Like a Ruling on My Case?" ["description"]=> string(4123) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.7.0.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/200/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal.7.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">In most cases, neither side in a family law matter gets exactly and entirely what they want from a judge pursuant to a contested hearing or trial. Although all-out victories occur, there is a certain risk in going to court that a judge will not give either side what they want. But if you lose on an issue very important to you, what can you do?</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">First, evaluate whether or not the judge really ruled wrongly. If the judge did nothing wrong and just believed the other side's case had more merit, there may not be any recourse. Child custody decisions are often made this way because the cases often boil down to "He said, she said," situations. The judge has to make a decision and does, even though one (or both) sides may not like it. However, if you believe the judge abused his discretion, made a mistake in interpreting the law or some other error, you may be able to do something to change the outcome.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Second, be cognizant that there are various deadlines involved in trying to change/correct a judge's ruling. The deadlines vary depending on the type of corrective action one contemplates. Appeals, for example, require that a Notice of Appeal be filed within thirty (30) days of the final order from which an appeal is sought.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Third, evaluate the different legal routes available. For example, there are special action appeals, regular appeals, motions for reconsideration, motions for new trial, motions for relief from judgment and motions to set aside. Perhaps in another post, I will deal with each of these in more detail but for now, parties should be aware that there are alternative methods of trying to undo a court's ruling, different methods work best for certain situations and stages of the proceedings, and there are always various timeframes/deadlines to consider. If you are going to take action, consult an attorney immediately to make sure you act in time!</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <u><em><span style="font-size:130%;color:#3333ff;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></em></u></span></strong><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:85%;color:#660000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-113157576507713839?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(87) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/11/what-if-i-dont-like-ruling-on-my-case.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(4123) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.7.0.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/200/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal.7.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">In most cases, neither side in a family law matter gets exactly and entirely what they want from a judge pursuant to a contested hearing or trial. Although all-out victories occur, there is a certain risk in going to court that a judge will not give either side what they want. But if you lose on an issue very important to you, what can you do?</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">First, evaluate whether or not the judge really ruled wrongly. If the judge did nothing wrong and just believed the other side's case had more merit, there may not be any recourse. Child custody decisions are often made this way because the cases often boil down to "He said, she said," situations. The judge has to make a decision and does, even though one (or both) sides may not like it. However, if you believe the judge abused his discretion, made a mistake in interpreting the law or some other error, you may be able to do something to change the outcome.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Second, be cognizant that there are various deadlines involved in trying to change/correct a judge's ruling. The deadlines vary depending on the type of corrective action one contemplates. Appeals, for example, require that a Notice of Appeal be filed within thirty (30) days of the final order from which an appeal is sought.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Third, evaluate the different legal routes available. For example, there are special action appeals, regular appeals, motions for reconsideration, motions for new trial, motions for relief from judgment and motions to set aside. Perhaps in another post, I will deal with each of these in more detail but for now, parties should be aware that there are alternative methods of trying to undo a court's ruling, different methods work best for certain situations and stages of the proceedings, and there are always various timeframes/deadlines to consider. If you are going to take action, consult an attorney immediately to make sure you act in time!</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <u><em><span style="font-size:130%;color:#3333ff;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></em></u></span></strong><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:85%;color:#660000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-113157576507713839?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [6]=> array(7) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112909552536467826" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:31:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-10-11T22:40:10.676-07:00" } ["description"]=> string(2982) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.7.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/200/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal.4.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>An Arizona family law case arose awhile back where two first cousins were married in Virginia but moved to Arizona sometime <em>before</em> ARS § 25-112 was amended in 1996. While legal at the time of marriage in Virginia when it occurred, a dispute arose as to whether the marriage should be considered valid under Arizona law. <em>Current</em> Arizona law would not consider the the marriage valid but the legal question involved timing. </strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Arizona law is applied when determining validity of a marriage from a state outside Arizona. Since Arizona only enacted its amendments to ARS § 25-112 in1996, marriages contracted in another state <em>prior</em> to enactment of that statute's amendments are not subject to the amendments. In other words, as long as a marriage is valid under the version of the statute prior to the 1996 amendments, Arizona cannot dispute the validity of a marriage even if the issue only comes up after the 1996 amendments. This ruling is from the Arizona domestic relations appellate case <u><em>Cook v. Cook</em></u>, 1 CA-CV 03-0727, January 13, 2005. </strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a> </u></span></em><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112909552536467826?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(86) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/10/arizona-family-law-case-arose-awhile.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(2982) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.7.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/200/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal.4.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>An Arizona family law case arose awhile back where two first cousins were married in Virginia but moved to Arizona sometime <em>before</em> ARS § 25-112 was amended in 1996. While legal at the time of marriage in Virginia when it occurred, a dispute arose as to whether the marriage should be considered valid under Arizona law. <em>Current</em> Arizona law would not consider the the marriage valid but the legal question involved timing. </strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Arizona law is applied when determining validity of a marriage from a state outside Arizona. Since Arizona only enacted its amendments to ARS § 25-112 in1996, marriages contracted in another state <em>prior</em> to enactment of that statute's amendments are not subject to the amendments. In other words, as long as a marriage is valid under the version of the statute prior to the 1996 amendments, Arizona cannot dispute the validity of a marriage even if the issue only comes up after the 1996 amendments. This ruling is from the Arizona domestic relations appellate case <u><em>Cook v. Cook</em></u>, 1 CA-CV 03-0727, January 13, 2005. </strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a> </u></span></em><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112909552536467826?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [7]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112901278081040613" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:26:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-10-10T23:40:24.580-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(28) "Legal Separation vs. Divorce" ["description"]=> string(3209) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.6.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 256px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 174px" height="152" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/320/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal.2.jpg" width="256" border="0" /></a><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Quite a few people seem to believe that a legal separation is a shortcut to ending a marriage in Arizona. Although it is possible that a legal separation could involve slightly, and I mean slightly, less paperwork initially, the practical truth is that legal separations in Arizona can take just as much time, effort and resources as a divorce. That's because they involve pretty much identical issues as divorces --property division, debt division, child custody, visitation, child support, etc. Legal separations can end up going to a full-on trial, not to mention temporary evidentiary hearings prior to trial. Thus, if you're looking for a shortcut, a legal separation may not be the answer.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Besides not being a shortcut to getting rid of a spouse, legal separations end with the parties <u>still being officially married</u>. Although everything has been divided up, the parties remain married, meaning that neither may legally remarry. My experience with legal separations is that one party or both almost always later decide that they want a full divorce with more paperwork that must be submitted to the court to convert the legal separation to a divorce, resulting in more time and expense.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><u><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com"><span style="font-size:130%;">www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></a></u></em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></span></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112901278081040613?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(77) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/10/legal-separation-vs-divorce.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(3209) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.6.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 256px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 174px" height="152" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/320/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal.2.jpg" width="256" border="0" /></a><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Quite a few people seem to believe that a legal separation is a shortcut to ending a marriage in Arizona. Although it is possible that a legal separation could involve slightly, and I mean slightly, less paperwork initially, the practical truth is that legal separations in Arizona can take just as much time, effort and resources as a divorce. That's because they involve pretty much identical issues as divorces --property division, debt division, child custody, visitation, child support, etc. Legal separations can end up going to a full-on trial, not to mention temporary evidentiary hearings prior to trial. Thus, if you're looking for a shortcut, a legal separation may not be the answer.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Besides not being a shortcut to getting rid of a spouse, legal separations end with the parties <u>still being officially married</u>. Although everything has been divided up, the parties remain married, meaning that neither may legally remarry. My experience with legal separations is that one party or both almost always later decide that they want a full divorce with more paperwork that must be submitted to the court to convert the legal separation to a divorce, resulting in more time and expense.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><u><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com"><span style="font-size:130%;">www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></a></u></em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></span></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112901278081040613?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [8]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112788640283258362" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:39:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-09-27T23:02:53.316-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(51) "Application of Payments on Child Support Arrearages" ["description"]=> string(2206) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.4.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/200/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal.2.jpg" border="0" /></a> <span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>When an obligor parent (the parent paying child support) makes payments toward a child support arrearage in Arizona, the court should first apply the payment to interest. This means that the child support arrearage itself will be paid only after the accrued interest is paid. So the Arizona Court of Appeals held on January 11, 2005 in <u>Alley v. Stevens</u> , 1 CA-CV 04-0097.</strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C. Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><u><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">http://www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></u></em></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112788640283258362?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(82) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/09/application-of-payments-on-child.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(2206) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.4.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/200/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal.2.jpg" border="0" /></a> <span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>When an obligor parent (the parent paying child support) makes payments toward a child support arrearage in Arizona, the court should first apply the payment to interest. This means that the child support arrearage itself will be paid only after the accrued interest is paid. So the Arizona Court of Appeals held on January 11, 2005 in <u>Alley v. Stevens</u> , 1 CA-CV 04-0097.</strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C. Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><u><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">http://www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></u></em></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112788640283258362?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [9]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112613717515225271" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:49:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-09-27T22:51:39.066-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(74) "What Legal Rights Do Step-Parents Have in Arizona Regarding Step-Children?" ["description"]=> string(7663) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.5.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/200/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal.3.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.5.jpg"></a><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Answer:</span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;">Step-parents in Arizona may have legal child custody or visitation rights under certain circumstances. Essentially, Arizona law allows step-parents who have acted in place of a parent to petition the court for child custody and parental access (visitation) rights. <em>In loco </em>parentis is the term adopted in the Arizona statute to describe this situation. Presumably, the step-parent would request child custody or visitation as part of a divorce or legal separation proceeding in the Arizona family court. </span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;">Acting in place of a parent is a high burden to meet and really requires more than just a relationship between a step-parent and step-child. In Arizona, a step-parent appears to have two routes to take in maintaining a relationship with a step-child. One such route would be to request visitation rights via an appropriate petition and the other route would be to actually request custody by alleging, among other things, that it would be significantly detrimental for either of the child's legal parents to have custody.</span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;">In Arizona, <em>in loco parentis</em> rights are covered by Arizona Revised Statute §25-415, reprinted below:</span> </strong><br /><strong><br /></strong><p><span style="font-family:Arial;color:#cc0000;"><em><strong>A.R.S. §25-415. Custody by nonparent; presumption; grounds; definitions</strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Arial;color:#cc0000;"><em><strong>A. A child custody proceeding may also be commenced in the superior court by a person other than a legal parent by filing a verified petition, or by a petition supported by an affidavit, in the county in which the child is permanently resident or is found. The petition shall include detailed facts supporting the petitioner's right to file the petition. The petitioner shall provide notice as required by subsection E. Notice shall include a copy of the petition and any affidavits. The court shall summarily deny a petition unless it finds that the petitioner by the pleadings established that all of the following are true:<br />1. The person filing the petition stands in loco parentis to the child.<br />2. It would be significantly detrimental to the child to remain or be placed in the custody of either of the child's living legal parents who wish to retain or obtain custody.<br />3. A court of competent jurisdiction has not entered or approved an order concerning the child's custody within one year before the person filed a petition pursuant to this section, unless there is reason to believe the child's present environment may seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.<br />4. One of the following applies:<br />(a) One of the legal parents is deceased.<br />(b) The child's legal parents are not married to each other at the time the petition is filed.<br />(c) There is a pending proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the legal parents at the time the petition is filed.<br />B. If a person other than a child's legal parent is seeking custody there is a rebuttable presumption that it is in the child's best interest to award custody to a legal parent because of the physical, psychological and emotional needs of the child to be reared by the child's legal parent. To rebut this presumption that person must show by clear and convincing evidence that awarding custody to a legal parent is not in the child's best interests.<br />C. The superior court may grant a person who stands in loco parentis to a child, including grandparents and great-grandparents, who meet the requirements of section 25-409 reasonable visitation rights to the child on a finding that the visitation is in the child's best interests and that any of the following is true:<br />1. One of the legal parents is deceased or has been missing at least three months.<br />2. The child's legal parents are not married to each other at the time the petition is filed.<br />3. There is a pending proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the legal parents at the time the petition is filed.<br />D. A grandparent, a great-grandparent or a person who stands in loco parentis to a child may bring a proceeding for visitation rights with a child by filing a verified petition in the county in which the child is permanently resident or is found.<br />E. Notice of a custody or visitation proceeding filed pursuant to this section shall be served pursuant to the rules of civil procedure to all of the following:<br />1. The child's parents.<br />2. A person who has court ordered custody or visitation rights.<br />3. The child's guardian or guardian ad litem.<br />4. A person or agency that has physical custody of the child or that claims to have custody or visitation rights.<br />5. Any other person or agency that has previously appeared in the action.<br />F. A person shall file proceedings for custody or visitation under this chapter in the same action in which the legal parents had their marriage dissolved or any other proceeding in which a previous custody order has been entered regarding the child.<br />G. For the purposes of this chapter:<br />1. "In loco parentis" means a person who has been treated as a parent by the child and who has formed a meaningful parental relationship with the child for a substantial period of time.<br />2. "Legal parent" means a biological or adoptive parent whose parental rights have not been terminated.</strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><u><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></u></em></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong><span style="font-size:85%;color:#660000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.<br /><br /></span></p></strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112613717515225271?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(88) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/09/what-legal-rights-do-step-parents-have.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(7663) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.5.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/200/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal.3.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.5.jpg"></a><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Answer:</span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;">Step-parents in Arizona may have legal child custody or visitation rights under certain circumstances. Essentially, Arizona law allows step-parents who have acted in place of a parent to petition the court for child custody and parental access (visitation) rights. <em>In loco </em>parentis is the term adopted in the Arizona statute to describe this situation. Presumably, the step-parent would request child custody or visitation as part of a divorce or legal separation proceeding in the Arizona family court. </span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;">Acting in place of a parent is a high burden to meet and really requires more than just a relationship between a step-parent and step-child. In Arizona, a step-parent appears to have two routes to take in maintaining a relationship with a step-child. One such route would be to request visitation rights via an appropriate petition and the other route would be to actually request custody by alleging, among other things, that it would be significantly detrimental for either of the child's legal parents to have custody.</span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:Arial;">In Arizona, <em>in loco parentis</em> rights are covered by Arizona Revised Statute §25-415, reprinted below:</span> </strong><br /><strong><br /></strong><p><span style="font-family:Arial;color:#cc0000;"><em><strong>A.R.S. §25-415. Custody by nonparent; presumption; grounds; definitions</strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-family:Arial;color:#cc0000;"><em><strong>A. A child custody proceeding may also be commenced in the superior court by a person other than a legal parent by filing a verified petition, or by a petition supported by an affidavit, in the county in which the child is permanently resident or is found. The petition shall include detailed facts supporting the petitioner's right to file the petition. The petitioner shall provide notice as required by subsection E. Notice shall include a copy of the petition and any affidavits. The court shall summarily deny a petition unless it finds that the petitioner by the pleadings established that all of the following are true:<br />1. The person filing the petition stands in loco parentis to the child.<br />2. It would be significantly detrimental to the child to remain or be placed in the custody of either of the child's living legal parents who wish to retain or obtain custody.<br />3. A court of competent jurisdiction has not entered or approved an order concerning the child's custody within one year before the person filed a petition pursuant to this section, unless there is reason to believe the child's present environment may seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.<br />4. One of the following applies:<br />(a) One of the legal parents is deceased.<br />(b) The child's legal parents are not married to each other at the time the petition is filed.<br />(c) There is a pending proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the legal parents at the time the petition is filed.<br />B. If a person other than a child's legal parent is seeking custody there is a rebuttable presumption that it is in the child's best interest to award custody to a legal parent because of the physical, psychological and emotional needs of the child to be reared by the child's legal parent. To rebut this presumption that person must show by clear and convincing evidence that awarding custody to a legal parent is not in the child's best interests.<br />C. The superior court may grant a person who stands in loco parentis to a child, including grandparents and great-grandparents, who meet the requirements of section 25-409 reasonable visitation rights to the child on a finding that the visitation is in the child's best interests and that any of the following is true:<br />1. One of the legal parents is deceased or has been missing at least three months.<br />2. The child's legal parents are not married to each other at the time the petition is filed.<br />3. There is a pending proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the legal parents at the time the petition is filed.<br />D. A grandparent, a great-grandparent or a person who stands in loco parentis to a child may bring a proceeding for visitation rights with a child by filing a verified petition in the county in which the child is permanently resident or is found.<br />E. Notice of a custody or visitation proceeding filed pursuant to this section shall be served pursuant to the rules of civil procedure to all of the following:<br />1. The child's parents.<br />2. A person who has court ordered custody or visitation rights.<br />3. The child's guardian or guardian ad litem.<br />4. A person or agency that has physical custody of the child or that claims to have custody or visitation rights.<br />5. Any other person or agency that has previously appeared in the action.<br />F. A person shall file proceedings for custody or visitation under this chapter in the same action in which the legal parents had their marriage dissolved or any other proceeding in which a previous custody order has been entered regarding the child.<br />G. For the purposes of this chapter:<br />1. "In loco parentis" means a person who has been treated as a parent by the child and who has formed a meaningful parental relationship with the child for a substantial period of time.<br />2. "Legal parent" means a biological or adoptive parent whose parental rights have not been terminated.</strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><u><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></u></em></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong><span style="font-size:85%;color:#660000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.<br /><br /></span></p></strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112613717515225271?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [10]=> array(7) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112319536291110368" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:34:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-10-10T23:41:24.340-07:00" } ["description"]=> string(5438) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.1.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 234px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 163px" height="163" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/320/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.1.jpg" width="267" border="0" /></a><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Readers:</span></strong></em><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></em><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">I received permission to reprint the junk fax article that follows. I hope you find it interesting. Keep in mind that this is not my area of practice, although I have several people who work for me, including one attorney, that spend time on junk fax litigation. I recommend that you not rely on the information in the article for purposes of taking action. Instead, use it as a jumping off point when you consult an attorney prior to taking any action relating to junk faxes. I do, however, advise people to not send out unsolicited faxes because significant liability can follow.</span></strong></em><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></em><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Trent</span></strong></em><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:180%;color:#990000;"><strong>Just the Facts About Junk Faxes: </strong></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong><span style="color:#990000;"><span style="font-size:180%;">Why You Should Care About Revisions to U.S.C. Title 47 §227<br /></span><br />The boys on Capitol Hill are at it again, picking over work they’ve previously produced, making little fussy tweaks to a bunch of regulations. Big yawn. Turn the page. It doesn’t affect your life, right?<br /><br />Wrong.<br /><br />This time, your congressperson is working on the side of the spammers, the solicitors who call you at dinner, who fill your e-mail box with promises of bigger body parts and instant wealth, who run your fax machine out of paper and toner while you wait for your client to send you a vital piece of information.<br /><br />Title 47, section 227 of the United States Code sets forth restrictions on the use of telephone equipment, especially as it relates to unsolicited phone and fax advertisements. If you’ve sent spam faxes to Encompass West, you are familiar with the provision<br />under b(1)(C) which says you cannot use a telephone facsimile machine (or computer, or other device) to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine. Period. No exceptions.<br /><br />The amendment proposed in the "Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005" sets up an exemption for the spammers. They can’t send an unsolicited advertisement to your fax machine unless (A) they have an established business relationship with you and (B) they let you know that you have a way out--by sending a fax back to them (1) at the fax number they list on the opt-out, (2) identifying your fax number that you want removed, and (3) never ever opt-in again.<br /><br />Now, this doesn’t sound so very terrible on its face. Let’s take a little closer look at this.<br /><br />You run across a good offer from a reputable company, and when a representative asks if they can add you to their mailing list to keep in touch with other good stuff you might find interesting, you agree. You’ve just opted in to receive junk mail from these people. They now have an established business relationship with you. Welcome to Jack Junkfaxer’s spam list.<br /><br />Now you get a fax from Jack, and you write across the cover sheet to remove this fax number from his list, and fax it right back to him. Only took a minute, right? Here’s the bad news--Jack has 1,000 other clients he sends faxes for, not just the one he hooked you up with. That’s 1,000 minutes to get off his spam list--or 16 hours and forty minutes of your time. It took you two full work days to remove<br />just that one number. And Jack is small potatoes.<br /><br />Worse yet, how much does it take to form an established business relationship? One could argue that if you or someone from your business handed out your fax number, that’s enough to construe an invitation to fax. So you go to a convention, network like crazy, and you hand Jack Junkfaxer your card. Voila, you’re now back on his list.<br /><br />Exemptions for unsolicited phone calls makes sense—there’s the “Do Not Call” list to opt out permanently, there’s no time required other than hanging up when you discover it’s just a solicitor, and there’s no added expense incurred. Faxes cost.<br /><br />Faxes cost paper, toner, and time. Time to sort the wheat from the chaff, and under the amendments, time to write the note, and then time to fax it back to the spammer. This makes no sense. Call (or better yet, fax) your congressperson today and tell them to vote no on the Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.<br /><br />Beth Rees<br /><br /><em>(reprinted with permission)</em><br /><br />Contact the author at: bethrees@encompasswest.com</span></strong></span><span style="color:#333399;"><br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112319536291110368?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(82) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/08/readers-i-received-permission-to.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(5438) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.1.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 234px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 163px" height="163" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/320/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.1.jpg" width="267" border="0" /></a><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Readers:</span></strong></em><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></em><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">I received permission to reprint the junk fax article that follows. I hope you find it interesting. Keep in mind that this is not my area of practice, although I have several people who work for me, including one attorney, that spend time on junk fax litigation. I recommend that you not rely on the information in the article for purposes of taking action. Instead, use it as a jumping off point when you consult an attorney prior to taking any action relating to junk faxes. I do, however, advise people to not send out unsolicited faxes because significant liability can follow.</span></strong></em><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></em><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Trent</span></strong></em><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:180%;color:#990000;"><strong>Just the Facts About Junk Faxes: </strong></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong><span style="color:#990000;"><span style="font-size:180%;">Why You Should Care About Revisions to U.S.C. Title 47 §227<br /></span><br />The boys on Capitol Hill are at it again, picking over work they’ve previously produced, making little fussy tweaks to a bunch of regulations. Big yawn. Turn the page. It doesn’t affect your life, right?<br /><br />Wrong.<br /><br />This time, your congressperson is working on the side of the spammers, the solicitors who call you at dinner, who fill your e-mail box with promises of bigger body parts and instant wealth, who run your fax machine out of paper and toner while you wait for your client to send you a vital piece of information.<br /><br />Title 47, section 227 of the United States Code sets forth restrictions on the use of telephone equipment, especially as it relates to unsolicited phone and fax advertisements. If you’ve sent spam faxes to Encompass West, you are familiar with the provision<br />under b(1)(C) which says you cannot use a telephone facsimile machine (or computer, or other device) to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine. Period. No exceptions.<br /><br />The amendment proposed in the "Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005" sets up an exemption for the spammers. They can’t send an unsolicited advertisement to your fax machine unless (A) they have an established business relationship with you and (B) they let you know that you have a way out--by sending a fax back to them (1) at the fax number they list on the opt-out, (2) identifying your fax number that you want removed, and (3) never ever opt-in again.<br /><br />Now, this doesn’t sound so very terrible on its face. Let’s take a little closer look at this.<br /><br />You run across a good offer from a reputable company, and when a representative asks if they can add you to their mailing list to keep in touch with other good stuff you might find interesting, you agree. You’ve just opted in to receive junk mail from these people. They now have an established business relationship with you. Welcome to Jack Junkfaxer’s spam list.<br /><br />Now you get a fax from Jack, and you write across the cover sheet to remove this fax number from his list, and fax it right back to him. Only took a minute, right? Here’s the bad news--Jack has 1,000 other clients he sends faxes for, not just the one he hooked you up with. That’s 1,000 minutes to get off his spam list--or 16 hours and forty minutes of your time. It took you two full work days to remove<br />just that one number. And Jack is small potatoes.<br /><br />Worse yet, how much does it take to form an established business relationship? One could argue that if you or someone from your business handed out your fax number, that’s enough to construe an invitation to fax. So you go to a convention, network like crazy, and you hand Jack Junkfaxer your card. Voila, you’re now back on his list.<br /><br />Exemptions for unsolicited phone calls makes sense—there’s the “Do Not Call” list to opt out permanently, there’s no time required other than hanging up when you discover it’s just a solicitor, and there’s no added expense incurred. Faxes cost.<br /><br />Faxes cost paper, toner, and time. Time to sort the wheat from the chaff, and under the amendments, time to write the note, and then time to fax it back to the spammer. This makes no sense. Call (or better yet, fax) your congressperson today and tell them to vote no on the Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.<br /><br />Beth Rees<br /><br /><em>(reprinted with permission)</em><br /><br />Contact the author at: bethrees@encompasswest.com</span></strong></span><span style="color:#333399;"><br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112319536291110368?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [11]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112172347651625729" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:25:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-09-13T21:31:05.126-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(41) "The UCCJEA and Child Custody Jurisdiction" ["description"]=> string(5627) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.2.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/320/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.2.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) is what is known as a "uniform law." Uniform laws are generally created by a committee representing a national contingency of interested persons, legislators, professionals and others who believe that standard laws among the states would be a benefit on certain issues or in certain areas of the law, commerce, etc. Uniform laws are not federal laws but rely instead on the individual state legislatures to approve and make them the law of each state. The UCCJEA is one such law that has been passed in all U.S. states, including Arizona, where the Arizona family courts routinely addressed UCCJEA-covered issues. Arizona has codified the UCCJEA in Arizona Revised Statutes §§25-1031 et seq.</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">The UCCJEA must be read in its totality, rather than piecemeal, just because that's the way it was written. As well, there is significant case law in the various state and appellate courts, some of which can vary from court to court but much of which will influence the reading of the UCCJEA. Normally, the single most significant factor in determining jurisdiction over child custody determinations under the UCCJEA is the six (6) month requirement. While Arizona Revised Statute §25-1031 speaks of initial jurisdiction, A.R.S. §25-1033 states that another court can modify an order from another state if the child has resided in the new state for six (6) months. That's how jurisdiction (and the child's home state) most commonly transfers, simply by length of residence in the new state. There has been some discussion over the years over what effect one parent remaining in the child's original home state has on later litigation. From my experience, the six month provision controls in most instances. The comments to the original UCCJA (the precursor to the UCCJEA) acknowledge this issue but did not really clear it up.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">In a case where one parent unlawfully or inappropriately removes the child to another state and then seeks a custody or other order related to the child in the new state, the new state, in most such instances, should decline jurisdiction by reason of the wrongful conduct. See A.R.S. §25-1038. In fact, the original UCCJA was designed specifically to prevent the wrongful taking of children. Prior to the UCCJA, parents could take children from state to state until they finally were granted custody to the exclusion of the other parent's rights. Even today, the important timeframes in jurisdiction cases mean that parents should <u>not</u> delay in addressing the issues. </span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">Another important UCCJEA provision is the prohibition against maintaining simultaneous proceedings. In other words, the UCCJEA addresses what happens when one parent files an action in the courts of one state while another proceeding, dealing with the same child/ren, has been filed in a different state.</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">The UCCJEA also includes a provision regarding temporary emergency jurisdiction. This provision helps protect abandoned or endangered children. Thus, even though one state court does not have proper jurisdiction, that state court may still make an order that will protect a child until proper jurisdiction is determined and the proper court issues a new order in place of the emergency temporary order.</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">There is much more to the UCCJEA and depending on a given state, the interpretation of the law can vary. Consult an attorney for information that may relate to your specific legal situation.</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /></strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u>www.wilcoxlegal.com</u></span></em><br /></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong><br /><br /><br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112172347651625729?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(87) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/07/uccjea-and-child-custody-jurisdiction.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(5627) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.2.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/320/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.2.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) is what is known as a "uniform law." Uniform laws are generally created by a committee representing a national contingency of interested persons, legislators, professionals and others who believe that standard laws among the states would be a benefit on certain issues or in certain areas of the law, commerce, etc. Uniform laws are not federal laws but rely instead on the individual state legislatures to approve and make them the law of each state. The UCCJEA is one such law that has been passed in all U.S. states, including Arizona, where the Arizona family courts routinely addressed UCCJEA-covered issues. Arizona has codified the UCCJEA in Arizona Revised Statutes §§25-1031 et seq.</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">The UCCJEA must be read in its totality, rather than piecemeal, just because that's the way it was written. As well, there is significant case law in the various state and appellate courts, some of which can vary from court to court but much of which will influence the reading of the UCCJEA. Normally, the single most significant factor in determining jurisdiction over child custody determinations under the UCCJEA is the six (6) month requirement. While Arizona Revised Statute §25-1031 speaks of initial jurisdiction, A.R.S. §25-1033 states that another court can modify an order from another state if the child has resided in the new state for six (6) months. That's how jurisdiction (and the child's home state) most commonly transfers, simply by length of residence in the new state. There has been some discussion over the years over what effect one parent remaining in the child's original home state has on later litigation. From my experience, the six month provision controls in most instances. The comments to the original UCCJA (the precursor to the UCCJEA) acknowledge this issue but did not really clear it up.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">In a case where one parent unlawfully or inappropriately removes the child to another state and then seeks a custody or other order related to the child in the new state, the new state, in most such instances, should decline jurisdiction by reason of the wrongful conduct. See A.R.S. §25-1038. In fact, the original UCCJA was designed specifically to prevent the wrongful taking of children. Prior to the UCCJA, parents could take children from state to state until they finally were granted custody to the exclusion of the other parent's rights. Even today, the important timeframes in jurisdiction cases mean that parents should <u>not</u> delay in addressing the issues. </span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">Another important UCCJEA provision is the prohibition against maintaining simultaneous proceedings. In other words, the UCCJEA addresses what happens when one parent files an action in the courts of one state while another proceeding, dealing with the same child/ren, has been filed in a different state.</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">The UCCJEA also includes a provision regarding temporary emergency jurisdiction. This provision helps protect abandoned or endangered children. Thus, even though one state court does not have proper jurisdiction, that state court may still make an order that will protect a child until proper jurisdiction is determined and the proper court issues a new order in place of the emergency temporary order.</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;">There is much more to the UCCJEA and depending on a given state, the interpretation of the law can vary. Consult an attorney for information that may relate to your specific legal situation.</span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /></strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u>www.wilcoxlegal.com</u></span></em><br /></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong><br /><br /><br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112172347651625729?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [12]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-112049300336456297" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:55:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-09-13T21:39:27.816-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(30) "The New Bankruptcy Legislation" ["description"]=> string(7557) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.3.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/320/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.3.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="color:#660000;"><em><span style="color:#660000;"><span style="font-family:arial;">Divorces, credit ratings and changed standards of living all seem to go together. One common issue in many divorces is bankruptcy. One party wants to file, both want to, one party is assigned to pay a debt but later discharges it in bankruptcy to the chagrin of the other party who now has a black mark on his/her credit report. Attorney Carrie Wilcox wrote the following article about the new bankruptyc legislation recently signed into law by President Bush with an effective date in October, 2005. Please consult an attorney for specific information that may affect your case.</span> </span></em><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:130%;">Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005:<br />How Could It Affect You or Your Business?<br /></span><br /><em>By Carrie M. Wilcox, Esq.<br /></em><br />Signed by President Bush on April 20, 2005, the “Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005” is generally effective as to bankruptcy cases filed on or after October 17, 2005. The reforms signif-icantly impact both individual and small business owners ability to receive bankruptcy relief via more stringent limits on bankruptcy options. Small businesses are affected because nearly 20 percent of the individual bankruptcies filed in 2004 were actually owners of small, unincorporated businesses.<br /><br />Highlighted below are the major areas impacted; the list, however, is not exhaustive.<br /><br /><u>Means Test – Section 707(b)(2).</u><br />Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings with primarily consumer debts are subject to dismissal upon a finding of abuse. Abuse can be found in one of two ways: first, through an un-rebutted presumption of abuse under the new means test; and second, on general grounds, including bad faith. The means test permits any party in interest, the Court or the Trustee, to seek dismissal of the case for abuse if the debtor’s income exceeds a defined state median. A debtor’s income is the “current monthly income” multiplied by 12. “Current monthly income” is a debtor’s average monthly income over a six-month period. Thus, the means test provides that a debtor may not be eligible for discharge when his/her income exceeds the state median, regardless of the amount of debt.<br /><br /><u>Extended Time Between Discharges – Section 727(a)(8). </u><br />Debtors filing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy are ineligible for discharge if the debtor filed a Chapter 7 or 11 within eight (8) years of the pending bankruptcy.<br /><br /><u>Production of additional documents – Section 521.</u><br />The reform legislation imposes a number of new production requirements on debtors. At least seven (7) days prior to the meeting of creditors, Chapters 7 and 11 debtors must provide to the trustee and any creditor making a timely request, a copy of the federal income tax return for the period for which the return was most recently due and for which the debtor filed a return. Failure of the debtor to produce the return requires dismissal of the case.<br /><br />Chapters 7, 11 and 13 debtors must also, on request of a party in interest or the judge, file with the Court at the same time filed with the IRS, copies of any federal income tax return for a tax year ending while the bankruptcy case is pending and for any tax year that ended during the three (3) years before the case was filed. If a Chapter 7 or 13 debtor fails to file all the information required under Section 521 within 45 days after filing, the case is dismissed on the 46th day.<br /><br /><u>Credit Counseling – Section 109(h).<br /></u>This is perhaps one of the most radical reforms in the legislation. Individuals are ineligible for relief under any chapter of the Bankruptcy Code unless, within 180 days of the bankruptcy filing, they received “an individual or group briefing” from a non-profit budget and credit counseling agency approved by the United States trus-tee or bankruptcy administrator under the standards set forth in section 111. Among the standards is a requirement that the agency provide its services without regard to the debtor’s ability to pay any fee. The service may be provided personally, telephonically or on the Internet and must outline opportunities for credit counseling and assist in performing a related budget analysis.<br /><br /><u>Automatic Stay – Section 362(c)(3).</u><br />If a Chapter 7, 11 or 13 bankruptcy is filed within one year of the dismissal of an earlier case, the automatic stay in the second case terminates 30 days after the filing.<br /><br /><u>Household Goods definition limited – Section 522(f)(4).</u><br />The new definition limits electronic equipment to which a non-possessory, non-purchase money security interest can be avoided to one (1) radio, one (1) television, one (1) VCR and one (1) personal computer with related equipment. The new section also excludes works of art not created by the debtor, jewelry worth more than $500 (except wedding rings), and motor vehicles.<br /><br /><u>Nondischargeability for fraud in the use of credit cards – Section 523(a)(2)(C).</u><br />Previously, a presumption of fraud existed when a debtor charged over $1,225 for luxury goods within sixty (60) days of filing for bankruptcy. That amount is now reduced to $500, and the time limit is expanded to ninety (90) days. Credit card cash advances, previously carrying the same limitations as purchases of luxury goods, now have the harsher $500, ninety (90) day limitation.<br /><br />The stricter bankruptcy filing requirements diminish the threat of a bankruptcy discharge for those collecting individual and/or business debts. If an individual or small business owner owes you money, this means a greater potential for recovery on overdue accounts. Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.’s experienced collection department is now accepting new accounts on a contingent fee basis. Contact Darlene Lewis, Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. Lead Collections Paralegal, for more information.<br /><br />Copyright © Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />All rights reserved. </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span><br /></span><br /></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112049300336456297?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(76) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/07/new-bankruptcy-legislation.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(7557) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.3.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/320/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.3.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="color:#660000;"><em><span style="color:#660000;"><span style="font-family:arial;">Divorces, credit ratings and changed standards of living all seem to go together. One common issue in many divorces is bankruptcy. One party wants to file, both want to, one party is assigned to pay a debt but later discharges it in bankruptcy to the chagrin of the other party who now has a black mark on his/her credit report. Attorney Carrie Wilcox wrote the following article about the new bankruptyc legislation recently signed into law by President Bush with an effective date in October, 2005. Please consult an attorney for specific information that may affect your case.</span> </span></em><br /></span><span style="font-family:arial;"></span><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:130%;">Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005:<br />How Could It Affect You or Your Business?<br /></span><br /><em>By Carrie M. Wilcox, Esq.<br /></em><br />Signed by President Bush on April 20, 2005, the “Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005” is generally effective as to bankruptcy cases filed on or after October 17, 2005. The reforms signif-icantly impact both individual and small business owners ability to receive bankruptcy relief via more stringent limits on bankruptcy options. Small businesses are affected because nearly 20 percent of the individual bankruptcies filed in 2004 were actually owners of small, unincorporated businesses.<br /><br />Highlighted below are the major areas impacted; the list, however, is not exhaustive.<br /><br /><u>Means Test – Section 707(b)(2).</u><br />Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings with primarily consumer debts are subject to dismissal upon a finding of abuse. Abuse can be found in one of two ways: first, through an un-rebutted presumption of abuse under the new means test; and second, on general grounds, including bad faith. The means test permits any party in interest, the Court or the Trustee, to seek dismissal of the case for abuse if the debtor’s income exceeds a defined state median. A debtor’s income is the “current monthly income” multiplied by 12. “Current monthly income” is a debtor’s average monthly income over a six-month period. Thus, the means test provides that a debtor may not be eligible for discharge when his/her income exceeds the state median, regardless of the amount of debt.<br /><br /><u>Extended Time Between Discharges – Section 727(a)(8). </u><br />Debtors filing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy are ineligible for discharge if the debtor filed a Chapter 7 or 11 within eight (8) years of the pending bankruptcy.<br /><br /><u>Production of additional documents – Section 521.</u><br />The reform legislation imposes a number of new production requirements on debtors. At least seven (7) days prior to the meeting of creditors, Chapters 7 and 11 debtors must provide to the trustee and any creditor making a timely request, a copy of the federal income tax return for the period for which the return was most recently due and for which the debtor filed a return. Failure of the debtor to produce the return requires dismissal of the case.<br /><br />Chapters 7, 11 and 13 debtors must also, on request of a party in interest or the judge, file with the Court at the same time filed with the IRS, copies of any federal income tax return for a tax year ending while the bankruptcy case is pending and for any tax year that ended during the three (3) years before the case was filed. If a Chapter 7 or 13 debtor fails to file all the information required under Section 521 within 45 days after filing, the case is dismissed on the 46th day.<br /><br /><u>Credit Counseling – Section 109(h).<br /></u>This is perhaps one of the most radical reforms in the legislation. Individuals are ineligible for relief under any chapter of the Bankruptcy Code unless, within 180 days of the bankruptcy filing, they received “an individual or group briefing” from a non-profit budget and credit counseling agency approved by the United States trus-tee or bankruptcy administrator under the standards set forth in section 111. Among the standards is a requirement that the agency provide its services without regard to the debtor’s ability to pay any fee. The service may be provided personally, telephonically or on the Internet and must outline opportunities for credit counseling and assist in performing a related budget analysis.<br /><br /><u>Automatic Stay – Section 362(c)(3).</u><br />If a Chapter 7, 11 or 13 bankruptcy is filed within one year of the dismissal of an earlier case, the automatic stay in the second case terminates 30 days after the filing.<br /><br /><u>Household Goods definition limited – Section 522(f)(4).</u><br />The new definition limits electronic equipment to which a non-possessory, non-purchase money security interest can be avoided to one (1) radio, one (1) television, one (1) VCR and one (1) personal computer with related equipment. The new section also excludes works of art not created by the debtor, jewelry worth more than $500 (except wedding rings), and motor vehicles.<br /><br /><u>Nondischargeability for fraud in the use of credit cards – Section 523(a)(2)(C).</u><br />Previously, a presumption of fraud existed when a debtor charged over $1,225 for luxury goods within sixty (60) days of filing for bankruptcy. That amount is now reduced to $500, and the time limit is expanded to ninety (90) days. Credit card cash advances, previously carrying the same limitations as purchases of luxury goods, now have the harsher $500, ninety (90) day limitation.<br /><br />The stricter bankruptcy filing requirements diminish the threat of a bankruptcy discharge for those collecting individual and/or business debts. If an individual or small business owner owes you money, this means a greater potential for recovery on overdue accounts. Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.’s experienced collection department is now accepting new accounts on a contingent fee basis. Contact Darlene Lewis, Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. Lead Collections Paralegal, for more information.<br /><br />Copyright © Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />All rights reserved. </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span><br /></span><br /></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-112049300336456297?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [13]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111955298467920353" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:48:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-09-13T21:40:03.340-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(81) "What is the Difference between a Simplified Modification and other Modifications?" ["description"]=> string(3326) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.1.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/200/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal..jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal..jpg"></a><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Answer:</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Simplified Modifications are used only for child support modifications in Arizona. The Arizona family court's Simplified Modification forms are used exclusively for this legal proceeding, whereas when a modification of child custody, spousal maintenance or other family law issue, you may either use a court-approved form or prepare your own legal pleading. You cannot modify anything other than child support using the Simplified Modification.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">The Simplified Modification is called "simplified" because if the other party does not object after service of process, the requested child support modification is approved by the Arizona family court and becomes the new court-ordered child support amount. No hearing is necessary. The Simplified Modification can be used to modify an Arizona child support amount up or down.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:Arial;">Keep in mind that if the non-filing party objects to the requested change in the Simplified Modification packet, the court will set a hearing before the assigned family court judge to determine the merits of the requested child support change.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><u><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></u></em><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#660000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.<br /></span></span></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-111955298467920353?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(87) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/06/what-is-difference-between-simplified.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(3326) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal.1.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/200/Trent4.chalk%26charcoal..jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalk&charcoal..jpg"></a><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Answer:</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Simplified Modifications are used only for child support modifications in Arizona. The Arizona family court's Simplified Modification forms are used exclusively for this legal proceeding, whereas when a modification of child custody, spousal maintenance or other family law issue, you may either use a court-approved form or prepare your own legal pleading. You cannot modify anything other than child support using the Simplified Modification.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">The Simplified Modification is called "simplified" because if the other party does not object after service of process, the requested child support modification is approved by the Arizona family court and becomes the new court-ordered child support amount. No hearing is necessary. The Simplified Modification can be used to modify an Arizona child support amount up or down.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:Arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:Arial;">Keep in mind that if the non-filing party objects to the requested change in the Simplified Modification packet, the court will set a hearing before the assigned family court judge to determine the merits of the requested child support change.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><u><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></u></em><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#660000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.<br /></span></span></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-111955298467920353?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [14]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111842849295940285" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:25:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-09-13T21:41:18.526-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(70) "Do the Arizona Child Support Guidelines Use Net or Gross Income? Why?" ["description"]=> string(3343) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.4.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/320/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.4.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Answer: The Arizona Child Support Guidelines use gross income. It allows the least amount of tinkering with income and simplifies the determination of actual income. Many clients tell me that it is not fair to use gross incomes in determining child support but the result would be the same for gross and net anyway. Why? Because the Arizona Family Courts are seeking an amount of child support to provide for children in a given manner. If the Arizona Family Court used net incomes instead of gross incomes in child support calculations, they just have to up the percentage to get the target amount.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Keep in mind that under the income shares child support model and Arizona public policy generally, the amount of child support is determined not by just a simple percentage of income as many states used to do and some still do, but rather by taking sociologicial, economic and legal data and trying to determine what the average family spends on a child at each income level. In other words, how much do people bringing in $5000 per month spend on each child, how much do parents bringing in $20,000 per month spend on their child, etc., etc. It seems probable, and the data bears it out, that parents with higher combined incomes spend more money on their children than parents with lower incomes and the Arizona Child Support Guidelines are in large part based on this presumption. See my posts below for other Arizona child support information.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /></span><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><u><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></u></em></span></strong><br /><strong><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><span style="font-family:arial;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span><br /><br /></span></strong><strong><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"></span></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-111842849295940285?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(85) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/06/do-arizona-child-support-guidelines.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(3343) "<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/1600/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.4.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3711/677/320/Trent4.chalkcharcoal.4.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Answer: The Arizona Child Support Guidelines use gross income. It allows the least amount of tinkering with income and simplifies the determination of actual income. Many clients tell me that it is not fair to use gross incomes in determining child support but the result would be the same for gross and net anyway. Why? Because the Arizona Family Courts are seeking an amount of child support to provide for children in a given manner. If the Arizona Family Court used net incomes instead of gross incomes in child support calculations, they just have to up the percentage to get the target amount.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /><strong>Keep in mind that under the income shares child support model and Arizona public policy generally, the amount of child support is determined not by just a simple percentage of income as many states used to do and some still do, but rather by taking sociologicial, economic and legal data and trying to determine what the average family spends on a child at each income level. In other words, how much do people bringing in $5000 per month spend on each child, how much do parents bringing in $20,000 per month spend on their child, etc., etc. It seems probable, and the data bears it out, that parents with higher combined incomes spend more money on their children than parents with lower incomes and the Arizona Child Support Guidelines are in large part based on this presumption. See my posts below for other Arizona child support information.</strong><br /><strong></strong><br /></span><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><u><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></u></em></span></strong><br /><strong><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><span style="font-family:arial;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span><br /><br /></span></strong><strong><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;"></span></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-111842849295940285?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [15]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111842785860296875" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:51:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-09-13T21:42:06.260-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(77) "How Do Living Expenses of the Parties Factor into Child Support Calculations?" ["description"]=> string(2606) "<span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Answer: Under Arizona family law, day-to-day living expenses really do not factor in at all in the Arizona family court's calculations. In other words, the Arizona Child Support Guidelines and Arizona Family Court system do not take into account whether a party to a divorce or paternity case has a high car or house payment, lives in an upscale neighborhood, likes to take his/her child to Vail on vacations or carries a great amount of debt. While the Arizona Family Court ignores those sorts of things, it will take into account certain specific categories of expenses such as health insurance, childcare expenses, extraordinary child-based expenses, certain education expenses and a 10% adjustment for children age 12 or older. In addition, court-ordered spousal maintenance, court-ordered child support and an adjustment for supporting other natural/adopted children are considered in determining each parent's income. Finally, the amount of time actually spent and/or ordered factors into Arizona child support calculations in a big way.</strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></u></span></em></strong></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-111842785860296875?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(83) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/06/how-do-living-expenses-of-parties.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(2606) "<span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Answer: Under Arizona family law, day-to-day living expenses really do not factor in at all in the Arizona family court's calculations. In other words, the Arizona Child Support Guidelines and Arizona Family Court system do not take into account whether a party to a divorce or paternity case has a high car or house payment, lives in an upscale neighborhood, likes to take his/her child to Vail on vacations or carries a great amount of debt. While the Arizona Family Court ignores those sorts of things, it will take into account certain specific categories of expenses such as health insurance, childcare expenses, extraordinary child-based expenses, certain education expenses and a 10% adjustment for children age 12 or older. In addition, court-ordered spousal maintenance, court-ordered child support and an adjustment for supporting other natural/adopted children are considered in determining each parent's income. Finally, the amount of time actually spent and/or ordered factors into Arizona child support calculations in a big way.</strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website: <em><span style="font-size:130%;"><u><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></u></span></em></strong></span><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong><br /><br /><span style="font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-111842785860296875?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [16]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111789606646378821" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:40:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-09-13T21:42:39.006-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(28) "May Minors Marry in Arizona?" ["description"]=> string(4587) "<strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Answer: Under certain circumstances, as dictated by Arizona law. Specifically, the relevant statute states as follows: </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em>A.R.S. §25-102. Consent Required for Marriage of Minors. </em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em></em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em>A. Persons under eighteen years of age shall not marry without the consent of the parent or guardian having custody of such person. Persons under sixteen years of age shall not marry without the consent of the parent or guardian having custody of that person and the approval of any superior court judge in the state. When both parents are living the consent of either parent is sufficient. When the parents are living apart, the consent shall be given by the parent who has the custody of the minor. </em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em></em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em>B. Before authorizing the marriage of a person who is under sixteen years of age, the court: 1. Shall require both parties to the marriage to complete premarital counseling. The court may waive this requirement if the court determines that premarital counseling is not reasonably available. 2. Must find that the minor is entering into the marriage voluntarily. 3. Must find that the marriage is in the best interests of the minor under the circumstances. 4. May require that the minor continue to attend school. 5. May require any other condition that the court determines is reasonable under the circumstances. </em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em></em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em>C. A marriage shall not take place under this section if it is prohibited by the law relating to prohibited and void marriages. </em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C. </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Trent Wilcox </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">For the Firm</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Phoenix office: </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Phoenix, Arizona 85012 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Ph: 602-631-9555 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Fx: 602-631-4004 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Goodyear office: </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Goodyear, Arizona 85338 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Ph: 623-344-7880 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Fx: 602-631-4004 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Visit our website: </span></strong><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com/"><strong><em><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;">http://www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></em></strong></a><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"> </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-111789606646378821?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(77) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/06/may-minors-marry-in-arizona.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(4587) "<strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Answer: Under certain circumstances, as dictated by Arizona law. Specifically, the relevant statute states as follows: </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em>A.R.S. §25-102. Consent Required for Marriage of Minors. </em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em></em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em>A. Persons under eighteen years of age shall not marry without the consent of the parent or guardian having custody of such person. Persons under sixteen years of age shall not marry without the consent of the parent or guardian having custody of that person and the approval of any superior court judge in the state. When both parents are living the consent of either parent is sufficient. When the parents are living apart, the consent shall be given by the parent who has the custody of the minor. </em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em></em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em>B. Before authorizing the marriage of a person who is under sixteen years of age, the court: 1. Shall require both parties to the marriage to complete premarital counseling. The court may waive this requirement if the court determines that premarital counseling is not reasonably available. 2. Must find that the minor is entering into the marriage voluntarily. 3. Must find that the marriage is in the best interests of the minor under the circumstances. 4. May require that the minor continue to attend school. 5. May require any other condition that the court determines is reasonable under the circumstances. </em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em></em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em>C. A marriage shall not take place under this section if it is prohibited by the law relating to prohibited and void marriages. </em></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C. </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Trent Wilcox </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">For the Firm</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Phoenix office: </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Phoenix, Arizona 85012 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Ph: 602-631-9555 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Fx: 602-631-4004 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Goodyear office: </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Goodyear, Arizona 85338 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Ph: 623-344-7880 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Fx: 602-631-4004 </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Visit our website: </span></strong><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com/"><strong><em><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:130%;">http://www.wilcoxlegal.com</span></em></strong></a><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"> </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:85%;color:#990000;">Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</span></strong><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-111789606646378821?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [17]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111789602037748872" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:22:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-09-13T21:43:12.680-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(20) "Common Law Marriages" ["description"]=> string(4997) "<strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Common law marriages are those that occur in an unofficial manner but that may be recognized in certain situations and places. Common law marriages can occur only in certain U.S. states. There are likely other countries outside the U.S. that have common law marriages, too. Arizona has a specific statute relating to common law marriages: </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em>Arizona Revised Statute §25-111</em> states as follows:</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">A. A marriage shall not be contracted by agreement without a marriage ceremony.<br />B. A marriage contracted within this state is not valid unless all of the following occur:<br />1. A license is issued as provided in this title.<br />2. The marriage is solemnized by a person authorized by law to solemnize marriages or by a person purporting to act in such capacity and believed in good faith by at least one of the parties to be so authorized.<br />3. The marriage is solemnized before the expiration of the marriage license.<br />C. The requirements of this section do not apply to the conversion of an existing marriage that is valid in this state to a covenant marriage that complies with the requirements of section 25-902.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></em><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">As you will note above, the statute states that for a marriage entered into in Arizona, certain requirements must be met. Specifically, Arizona requires a ceremony, license and an authorized person to conduct the ceremony (or at least believed to be authorized). Thus, you cannot marry via the common law method in Arizona. However, if a couple was legally married under the common law in another state, Arizona will recognize that marriage.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Typical, but probably not universal, requirements for common law marriages in those U.S. states that recognize them may include:</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">1. The couple must hold selves out as married. </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">2. Continuous cohabitation by the couple. </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">3. The couple must meet all other requirements to marry in that state, for example: </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">a) No same sex marriages (a subject getting a lot of attention of late).</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">b) Age requirements must be met.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">c) Neither party can be married to someone else. </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">d) No violations of a state's specific laws, such as those in Arizona Revised Statute §25-101. </span></strong><br /><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">To summarize:</span></strong><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong><br />1. No common law marriages can occur in Arizona.<br />2. If a person has a common law marriage in another state, Arizona may recognize it.<br />3. Evaluating the legitimacy of a purported common law marriage means looking at the law of the jurisdiction where the marriage occurred.<br /><br />Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website:</strong> <em><u><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></u></em></span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-111789602037748872?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" ["link"]=> string(70) "http://arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com/2005/06/common-law-marriages.html" ["author"]=> string(50) "noreply@blogger.com (Trent Wilcox, Arizona Lawyer)" ["summary"]=> string(4997) "<strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Common law marriages are those that occur in an unofficial manner but that may be recognized in certain situations and places. Common law marriages can occur only in certain U.S. states. There are likely other countries outside the U.S. that have common law marriages, too. Arizona has a specific statute relating to common law marriages: </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"><em>Arizona Revised Statute §25-111</em> states as follows:</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><em><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">A. A marriage shall not be contracted by agreement without a marriage ceremony.<br />B. A marriage contracted within this state is not valid unless all of the following occur:<br />1. A license is issued as provided in this title.<br />2. The marriage is solemnized by a person authorized by law to solemnize marriages or by a person purporting to act in such capacity and believed in good faith by at least one of the parties to be so authorized.<br />3. The marriage is solemnized before the expiration of the marriage license.<br />C. The requirements of this section do not apply to the conversion of an existing marriage that is valid in this state to a covenant marriage that complies with the requirements of section 25-902.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong></em><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">As you will note above, the statute states that for a marriage entered into in Arizona, certain requirements must be met. Specifically, Arizona requires a ceremony, license and an authorized person to conduct the ceremony (or at least believed to be authorized). Thus, you cannot marry via the common law method in Arizona. However, if a couple was legally married under the common law in another state, Arizona will recognize that marriage.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">Typical, but probably not universal, requirements for common law marriages in those U.S. states that recognize them may include:</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;"></span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">1. The couple must hold selves out as married. </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">2. Continuous cohabitation by the couple. </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">3. The couple must meet all other requirements to marry in that state, for example: </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">a) No same sex marriages (a subject getting a lot of attention of late).</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">b) Age requirements must be met.</span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">c) Neither party can be married to someone else. </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">d) No violations of a state's specific laws, such as those in Arizona Revised Statute §25-101. </span></strong><br /><br /><strong><span style="font-family:arial;">To summarize:</span></strong><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong><br />1. No common law marriages can occur in Arizona.<br />2. If a person has a common law marriage in another state, Arizona may recognize it.<br />3. Evaluating the legitimacy of a purported common law marriage means looking at the law of the jurisdiction where the marriage occurred.<br /><br />Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.<br />Trent Wilcox<br />For the Firm<br /><br />Phoenix office:<br />3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705<br />Phoenix, Arizona 85012<br />Ph: 602-631-9555<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Goodyear office:<br />1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240<br />Goodyear, Arizona 85338<br />Ph: 623-344-7880<br />Fx: 602-631-4004<br /><br />Visit our website:</strong> <em><u><span style="font-size:130%;"><a href="http://www.wilcoxlegal.com">www.wilcoxlegal.com</a></span></u></em></span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:85%;color:#990000;"><strong>Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an<br />attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the<br />attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The<br />information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox &amp; Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota.</strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9346767-111789602037748872?l=arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>" } [18]=> array(8) { ["guid"]=> string(57) "tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9346767.post-111644261706682881" ["pubdate"]=> string(31) "Wed, 18 May 2005 18:52:00 +0000" ["atom"]=> array(1) { ["updated"]=> string(29) "2005-09-13T21:43:36.930-07:00" } ["title"]=> string(46) "Arizona Passes Emancipation Statute for Minors" ["description"]=> string(18759) "<strong><span style="font-family:arial;">It appears that Arizona finally has an emancipation of minors law. House Bill 2428 was transmitted to Governor Janet Napolitano on April 13, 2005 and signed by her five days later. A few highlights that I found interesting include:<br /><br />1. A minor petitioning the court for emancipation cannot be a ward of the state or in the custody of any state agency.<br />2. The minor’s emancipation petition must be accompanied by at least one of the following:<br />(i) documentation that the minor has been living on the minor's own for at least three consecutive months.<br />(ii) a statement explaining why the minor believes the home of the minor's parent or legal guardian is not a healthy or safe environment.<br />(iii) a notarized statement that contains written consent to the emancipation and an explanation by the minor's parent or legal guardian.<br />3. The court may waive the initial filing fee for the petition, appoint a guardian ad litem for the petitioning minor, refer the parties to mediation, order Child Protective Services to investigate neglect, abuse or abandonment allegations.<br />4. An emancipated minor will then have much the same rights as an adult including the ability to enter into binding contracts and to sue/be sued in the courts.<br />5. Because the juvenile court is referenced, it appears that’s the Superior Court branch that will have jurisdiction over emancipation issues.<br /><br />The text of the emancipation statutes follows below:<br /></span></strong><br /><br /><em>12-2451. Petition for emancipation order; requirements; notification; representation; waiver of filing fees<br />A. A MINOR WHO WISHES TO BE EMANCIPATED MAY FILE A PETITION FOR AN EMANCIPATION ORDER WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE MINOR RESIDES IF ALL OF THE FOLLOWING APPLY:<br />1. THE MINOR IS AT LEAST SIXTEEN YEARS OF AGE.<br />2. THE MINOR IS A RESIDENT OF THIS STATE.<br />3. THE MINOR IS FINANCIALLY SELF-SUFFICIENT.<br />4. THE MINOR ACKNOWLEDGES IN WRITING THAT THE MINOR HAS READ AND UNDERSTANDS INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED BY THE COURT AND THAT EXPLAINS THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF AN EMANCIPATED MINOR AND THE POTENTIAL RISKS AND CONSEQUENCES OF EMANCIPATION.<br />5. THE MINOR IS NOT A WARD OF THE COURT AND IS NOT IN THE CARE, CUSTODY AND CONTROL OF A STATE AGENCY.<br />B. A PETITION FILED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING:<br />1. THE PETITIONER'S NAME, MAILING ADDRESS, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER AND DATE OF BIRTH.<br />2. THE NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER'S PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN IF KNOWN.<br />3. SPECIFIC FACTS TO SUPPORT THE PETITION, INCLUDING:<br />(a) THE MINOR'S DEMONSTRATED ABILITY TO MANAGE THE MINOR'S FINANCIAL AFFAIRS INCLUDING PROOF OF EMPLOYMENT OR OTHER MEANS OF SUPPORT.<br />(b) THE MINOR'S DEMONSTRATED ABILITY TO MANAGE THE MINOR'S PERSONAL AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS, INCLUDING PROOF OF HOUSING.<br />(c) THE MINOR'S DEMONSTRATED ABILITY TO LIVE WHOLLY INDEPENDENT OF THE MINOR'S PARENT.<br />(d) THE MINOR'S DEMONSTRATED ABILITY AND COMMITMENT TO OBTAIN OR MAINTAIN EDUCATION, VOCATIONAL TRAINING OR EMPLOYMENT.<br />(e) HOW THE MINOR WILL OBTAIN OR MAINTAIN HEALTH CARE.<br />(f) ANY OTHER INFORMATION CONSIDERED NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE PETITION.<br />(g) AT LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:<br />(i) DOCUMENTATION THAT THE MINOR HAS BEEN LIVING ON THE MINOR'S OWN FOR AT LEAST THREE CONSECUTIVE MONTHS.<br />(ii) A STATEMENT EXPLAINING WHY THE MINOR BELIEVES THE HOME OF THE MINOR'S PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN IS NOT A HEALTHY OR SAFE ENVIRONMENT.<br />(iii) A NOTARIZED STATEMENT THAT CONTAINS WRITTEN CONSENT TO THE EMANCIPATION AND AN EXPLANATION BY THE MINOR'S PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN.<br />C. THE COURT SHALL HOLD A HEARING ON THE PETITION WITHIN NINETY DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF ITS FILING AND SHALL NOTIFY THE PETITIONER AND THE PETITIONER'S PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN OF THE DATE AND PLACE OF THE HEARING BY CERTIFIED MAIL AT LEAST SIXTY DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING DATE. FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, THE COURT MAY CONTINUE THE INITIAL EMANCIPATION HEARING.<br />D. THE MINOR'S PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN MAY FILE A WRITTEN RESPONSE OBJECTING TO THE EMANCIPATION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF THE HEARING.<br />E. THE MINOR MAY PARTICIPATE IN THE COURT PROCEEDINGS ON THE MINOR'S OWN BEHALF OR BE REPRESENTED BY AN ATTORNEY CHOSEN BY THE MINOR. IF THE COURT DETERMINES IT NECESSARY, THE COURT MAY APPOINT A GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR THE PETITIONER.<br />F. THE COURT MAY REDUCE OR WAIVE THE FEE PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 12-284 FOR FILING A PETITION FOR EMANCIPATION OF A MINOR FOR FINANCIAL HARDSHIP.<br />12-2452. Additional court orders<br />A. BEFORE AN EMANCIPATION CASE PROCEEDS, THE COURT MAY STAY THE PROCEEDINGS AND:<br />1. REFER THE PARTIES TO MEDIATION.<br />2. IF THE COURT REASONABLY BELIEVES THAT THE PETITION CONTAINS AN ALLEGATION OF CHILD ABUSE OR NEGLECT, REQUIRE CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES TO INVESTIGATE THE ALLEGATION AND MAKE A WRITTEN REPORT OF THE INVESTIGATION TO THE COURT.<br />B. IF THE MINOR'S PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN OBJECTS TO THE PETITION FOR EMANCIPATION, THE COURT SHALL STAY THE PROCEEDING AND REFER THE PARTIES TO MEDIATION OR ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION UNLESS THE COURT REASONABLY BELIEVES THAT MEDIATION WOULD NOT BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE MINOR. THE COURT MAY CONSIDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:<br />1. THE MINOR'S PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF ABUSE, NEGLECT OR ABANDONMENT.<br />2. THE MINOR'S PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN IS NAMED AS A PERPETRATOR OF ABUSE, NEGLECT OR ABANDONMENT IN THE PROTECTIVE SERVICES CENTRAL REGISTRY PURSUANT TO SECTION 8-804.<br />3. ANY OTHER INFORMATION THE COURT DEEMS RELEVANT.<br />C. IF AGREEMENT IS REACHED THROUGH MEDIATION, THE PARTIES SHALL SUBMIT THE SIGNED MEDIATION AGREEMENT TO THE COURT.<br />12-2453. Factors; best interests of minor<br />A. THE COURT SHALL DETERMINE EMANCIPATION BASED ON THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE MINOR AND SHALL CONSIDER ALL RELEVANT FACTORS, INCLUDING:<br />1. THE POTENTIAL RISKS AND CONSEQUENCES OF EMANCIPATION AND TO WHAT DEGREE THE MINOR UNDERSTANDS THESE RISKS AND CONSEQUENCES.<br />2. THE WISHES OF THE MINOR.<br />3. THE OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MINOR'S PARENT OR GUARDIAN.<br />4. THE FINANCIAL RESOURCES OF THE MINOR, INCLUDING THE MINOR'S EMPLOYMENT HISTORY.<br />5. THE MINOR'S ABILITY TO BE FINANCIALLY SELF-SUFFICIENT.<br />6. THE MINOR'S LEVEL OF EDUCATION AND THE MINOR'S SUCCESS IN SCHOOL.<br />7. WHETHER THE MINOR HAS A CRIMINAL RECORD.<br />B. THE MINOR HAS THE BURDEN OF PROOF BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE.<br />C. THE COURT SHALL FILE AN EMANCIPATION ORDER WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT AND ISSUE A COPY OF THE ORDER TO THE MINOR AND THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY OR ITS AGENT, IF THE MINOR IS A CHILD IN A TITLE IV-D CASE.<br />D. AN EMANCIPATION ORDER ISSUED BY A COURT PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE:<br />1. IS CONCLU