Although child custody laws vary depending on the state where the child resides, they all have the same goal. Such laws were created to protect the interests of the child after the marriage of his or her parents has been dissolved. The courts must decide which parent is best capable of providing a healthy, positive and nurturing environment in which the child can grow.

Instead of automatically favoring mothers or fathers, custody laws are designed to ensure that the child is placed with the parent who is considered by the local courts as the most suitable person to raise the child. In most cases, the parent who was the primary caregiver during the marriage is awarded custody of the child after the divorce. Laws regarding child custody address multiple considerations such as visitation rights, the child’s financial support, and physical and legal custody.

Understanding Physical Versus Legal Custody

Physical custody simply refers to where the child resides, while the parent who has legal custody is the party responsible for making decisions concerning the child’s life. In the case of joint custody, both parents are legal custodians of the child and typically both have equal authority when making decisions related to the child’s education, religious practices, medical care or other pertinent issues.

Child Support Laws

Child support payments are based on a variety of factors such as the income of the non-custodial parent and the amount of money needed to properly care for the child. This amount is determined through the use of guidelines that were established by the Child Support Enforcement Act of 1984. These guidelines also depend on the state in which the child and his or her custodial parent reside, as the cost of living and wages vary significantly from state to state.

Visitation

The laws regarding child custody also cover visitation issues. The parent who has sole custody of the child is typically ordered to work out a visitation schedule with his or her former partner and if this cannot be agreed upon, the court will create a schedule in order to ensure the non-custodial parent is allowed to spend time with his or her child. However, if there is a history of abuse concerning the non-custodial parent, supervised visitation will be ordered and the non-custodial parent will not be allowed to see the child alone.

As previously mentioned, the laws regarding child custody vary considerably from state to state, and each case is dealt with on an individual basis through the parents’ local court system. In order to gain a thorough understanding about the laws of a particular state, it is best to seek the advice of an attorney who specializes in child custody laws.

For more information on how to change child custody you can visit WinChildCustodyLaws.org

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Lexor_Emman
http://EzineArticles.com/?Understanding-Child-Custody-Law&id=6779199

Lawyers often receive inquiries about the legalities of recording phone or other conversations in Arizona. In particular, the issue frequently arises in family law cases where child custody is at issue. Related to the recording issue is the “bugging” issue.

There are a number of variables that affect the answer to the central question, whether it is legal to either record or even bug conversations. First, bugging and recording are two different issues under Arizona law, often related, but also potentially very different under the law. Second, the laws regarding bugging and recording vary significantly by jurisdiction so what is legal in one state may be illegal in another. As well, the federal law may vary from state laws.

The following is a very brief analysis of the bugging and recording law in Arizona:

A. Bugging, otherwise known as wiretapping, typically means placing a device on a phone that allows one to eavesdrop on a conversation or other transmission. Bugging by a private party is considered illegal almost all of the time for two reasons primarily: First, it allows someone to listen to a private conversation between two or more unsuspecting parties. Second, bugs are usually placed without permission so you have a number of infractions inherent in such trespass-like activity. If you suspect someone has placed a bug on your phone or other device, you should call the police.

B. In the case of a telephone or in-person conversation, recording simply means making a copy of the conversation between two or more people. Recording is illegal in Arizona if NO party to the conversation knows that the conversation is being recorded. However, in Arizona, and this varies by state, if one party to the conversation knows that the conversation is being recorded, it is not illegal. Thus, if someone tape records a phone call or conversation involving him/herself and another person, even one who is unaware of being recorded, that’s legal in Arizona. If the same person taps into a phone line and records a conversation between two people who are unaware they are being recorded, it is ILLEGAL. Arizona and federal law are similar in this respect; however, recording conversations is illegal in certain other states unless all parties know of the recording and consent. There may be some cross-jurisdictional issues involved when tape recording a conversation across state or national boundaries. Prior to tape recording, I recommend that you consult an attorney in the appropriate jurisdiction.

In summary, bugging/wiretapping is always illegal while tape recording is legal in Arizona as long as one party to the conversation is aware the conversation is being recorded. However, don’t make assumptions about the law in other states -consult an attorney to determine what is allowed.

Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C.

Trent Wilcox

For the Firm

Phoenix office:

3030 N. Central Ave., Ste. 705

Phoenix, Arizona 85012

Ph: 602-631-9555

Fx: 602-631-4004

Goodyear office:

1616 N. Litchfield Rd., Ste. 240

Goodyear, Arizona 85338

Ph: 623-344-7880

Fx: 602-631-4004

Visit our website: www.wilcoxlegal.com

Check out our web log: http://www.arizonafamilylaw.blogspot.com

Disclaimer: Providing the above information does not establish an attorney-client relationship. To create such a relationship, both the attorney and potential client must sign a written fee agreement. The information contained herein is meant only as general information and is not meant to be relied upon for the purpose of taking legal action. You should contact an attorney in person for further and specific information. Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C. attorneys are licensed in Arizona only except for personal injury attorney Robert N. Edwards, who is licensed in Arizona and Minnesota. Information in this article may apply only to Arizona.

Attorney Trent R. Wilcox is the managing partner of Wilcox & Wilcox, P.C. Mr. Wilcox practices in the areas of family law, employment disputes and general civil litigation. Mr. Wilcox is admitted to practice in the Arizona state court and federal district court and is a member of the Maricopa County, Arizona State and American Bar Associations.

Mr. Wilcox has worked closely with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children to return abducted children to the custodial parent. He has assisted parents in cases brought under The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

Mr. Wilcox plays golf professionally when time remains after family and the demands of the law office have been met and currently carries a +3.9 handicap.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Trent_Wilcox
http://EzineArticles.com/?Bugging-and-Tape-Recording-Conversations-in-Arizona:–Is-it-Legal?&id=18097

Why Child Custody Mediation is Needed

So you have found yourself in a position where you and the other parent of your child are no longer together. Whether or not you are fighting over arrangements, it is often a good thing to make sure that you are seeking out a way to have your agreements for custody and visitation clearly spelled out in legal documents. It is also important to make sure that each party is completely understanding of the terms that they are agreeing to. This will help to make sure that there are not a lot of problems later down the road.

Two Types of Child Custody Mediators

There are two types of mediators out there. There are the private mediators that you hire and then there are the court appointed mediators. For arguments sake, lets say that they two of you are not seeing eye-to-eye on the issue of custody and visitation. You both obviously love and care for the child. You want to make sure that each parent is getting what is not just fair to them, but what is fair to the child. Sometimes though, our love and a wide variety of emotions can block our vision of what would truly be in the best interest of everyone involved.

When there is a disagreement, one or both of the parties will file a motion with the courts. Essentially, it is being asked that there be an intervening of some kind. You might want to march right into the courtroom and let the judge know your concerns and wishes, but there is a good chance that you might never see a judge and if at all possible, that should be the way that you want it. After all, over the next 18 years, you are going to have a lot of decisions to be made between the two of you and there cannot be a judge to be in the middle of every discussion.

The Mediation Process

Before anyone ever sees a judge, the courts will appoint a third-party, non-biased mediator. You and your ex-partner will receive a date and time where you will all three meet. This usually takes place in the courthouse building. You are more than welcome to bring your attorney if you have one. If there is a lot of fighting taking place, it might be beneficial to hire an attorney.

The mediator will talk with the two of you, generally in separate rooms, to hear your opinions and your wishes. The mediator will go back and forth between you in order to try to work out some an agreement. Refusing absolutely everything because you would prefer 5pm pickup times as opposed to the 4pm pickup time is not beneficial. You want to meet on some sort of middle ground. Not only will working through a mediator save you a lot of time and frustration, but it will save you a lot of money as well. And since the end agreement is put into the same legal documents a judge would put the agreement in, you might as well give it a try.

The Difference Between Mediation and Litigation

The difference between the mediator and the judge is that if there is no compromise between the parents or guardians, the mediator cannot force a decision, where a judge can. And since you might not like the opinion of a judge, you might want to do whatever you can in order to work things out with the help of a mediator.

Matthew Brickman is a Florida Supreme Court certified family mediator and founder of iChatMediation family mediation services serving West Palm Beach Florida, the surrounding counties and the entire country via online conferencing. You can read more about the details involving post divorce matters by watching a short video on child custody laws or visiting the page on my website for child custody mediation.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Matthew_C_Brickman
http://EzineArticles.com/?Why-Child-Custody-Mediation-Is-Helpful&id=6577317

The domicile or residence of the child typically cannot be moved from the state without the prior approval of the court or judge who awarded custody. If the custodial parent moves the domicile of the minor child out of the state against the wishes of the non-custodial parent and without the permission of the court, then the court may sanction orders of contempt. An order to permit a parent to move a child from the state is often required before a move can occur especially in contested relocation or move-away cases. The relocation or move-away order may be entered either by consent of both parties or by the court after a hearing.

Often court orders will include a change of domicile provision stating that the custodial parent shall not remove the minor child from the state without prior approval of the court. The reason for this provision is to protect the non-custodial parent’s rights to visitation and to ensure that a custodial parent’s move out of state is legitimate and the motive is not to frustrate or deny the non-custodial parent access to the minor child.

If the parties mutually agree to a change of domicile and they sign a written agreement known as a stipulation and consent agreement, it may be entered as an order, if approved by the court.

However, if the parties cannot mutually agree on a change of domicile, they may either contact the other party for reaching a consensus, attempt to resolve the matter in mediation or another form of alternative dispute resolution, or if this is not possible, they may choose to file a petition in court.

If you have questions or find yourself in a situation where the custodial parent wishes to take your child out of state against your wishes or against a court order, you would do well to consult an attorney in your jurisdiction to help you learn where you stand legally on this matter and to learn what your legal options are.

© 2007 Child Custody Coach

Child Custody Coach supplies information, online materials, and coaching services to parents in the field of child custody, namely, divorce, child custody and visitation, child custody evaluations, 730 evaluations, parenting techniques, and all issues related to child custody and divorce. How to Win Child Custody – Proven Strategies that can Win You Custody and Save You Thousands in Attorney Costs! is a unique child custody strategy guide provided as an E-Book for immediate access written by Steven Carlson who is known nationally as The Custody Coach�. Custody Match is an online consumer and family law attorney matching service find the right family law attorney, divorce, attorney, or child custody lawyer in your area.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Steven_Carlson
http://EzineArticles.com/?Can-a-Custodial-Parent-Take-a-Child-out-of-State?&id=606444

The visitation rights of non-custodial fathers should be discussed with a licensed family law attorney. Each divorce may present unique circumstances, which may lead to different agreements regarding custody and visitation. The family law court has a say in the visitation rights of the non-custodial parent and acts in the best interests of the child when determining custody and visitation.

There are two types of custody that must be determined in cases of divorce. Legal custody refers to who makes the important decisions in the child’s life such as education, religion and healthcare. In many cases, the court will reward joint legal custody to both parents so that they both have a right to make these decisions.

Physical custody refers to which parent the child will live with. Just because sole physical custody is granted to one parent doesn’t mean the non-custodial parent does not have the right to visit their child. The judge and the parents will often work out a schedule for visitation for the non-custodial parent. In many cases this may include the right to see the child on the weekend or every other weekend, although this may vary greatly on a case by case basis.

In some cases, joint physical custody will be granted. When this is the case, the child will spend a fair amount of time with both parents. Determining which scenario is in the best interests of the child is the goal of the family law judge in determining custody and visitation.

Both parties are encouraged to obtain court orders granting custody and visitation rights. Without court orders, it may become more difficult to exercise one’s visitation or custody rights. Those seeking further information regarding visitation and custody are encouraged to speak with a family law attorney. This is usually the best resource for information regarding family law matters including the visitation rights of divorced fathers.

Justin writes on many topics and agrees that you would be best helped by getting in touch with an experienced and professional Father’s Rights Lawyer in your area. For people with a California Divorce Assistance involving children, visit the offices of Diefer Law Group

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Justin_DiMateo
http://EzineArticles.com/?Fathers-Visitation-Rights-in-Divorce-Cases&id=4307986

Top Tips on Father’s Rights

The term father’s rights can take on a few different meaning. In the broadest sense, it relates to a movement which pushes for more recognition of the rights of fathers in what is often perceived to be a judicial system which favors mothers in cases of divorce. In a more specific sense, it means the individual rights of a father in a divorce or separation situation. We’ll cover both of these issues in this article – the broader movement as well as the actual rights you have as a father if your marriage is splitting up.

The Bias of Family Courts

One of the core ideas of father’s rights activists is that fathers are discriminated against by the family court system. Divorce law in many states tends to give custody to whichever parent is deemed to be closest to the children and seen as most instrumental to carrying on their lives unaffected. This notion grows out of the idea that the divorce should affect children as little as possible, so custody should also reflect the “status quo” of life before the divorce as much as possible for the children. Because in many traditional families the father is the main breadwinner and the mother stays at home to look after the children, the mother wins custody almost by default in many of these situations.

Fathers’ advocates argue that this is unfair because it restricts fathers in their right to be a parent. Advocates of father’s rights also tend to point out that children should be raised by both parents (except in cases where a parent has been abusive). In this argument, the best interests of the children (on which child custody laws are built) are to have both parents involved in their lives. So the best interests of children are not very well represented by the current legal model which tends to be lopsided towards giving sole custody to mothers.

The movement has also strongly criticized the current models of child support used because they usually end in fathers paying money to mothers, even in shared custody scenarios. In such a scenario the father is left with less money to support the children when he has custody of them.

Individual Rights of Fathers

First of all, you have a right to have a relationship with your children unless you have actually taken action which would lead to you forfeiting that right, such as being physically violent towards your wife or the children themselves. If you’re not at fault, you have every right to have a relationship with your children and you should fight for that right. The law is intended to reach a conclusion which serves the best interests of the children. You need to demonstrate that having a good relationship with you is in their best interests.

Be aware that your wife may produce trumped-up charges in order to make a case against you for sole custody – such as accusing you of abuse when you’re guilty of no such crime. You know the character of your ex-wife so you’ll know whether this situation might apply to you or not. If this happens, you need to get the best lawyer you can and gather all the evidence possible to prove that you’re innocent of such crimes. Unfortunately this often comes down to a “your word against hers” situation, in which case the way your character and your wife’s character is represented in court becomes of ultimate importance. In other words you win such a case by demonstrating that you’re not the type of person who would abuse his family, and she is the type of person capable of lying about that.

Even without going to such extremes, your ex may attempt to block you from seeing your kids. It’s important to remind her not to let her own selfish interests get in the way of what’s best for the kids and that by blocking them from having a father, she’s actually hurting them the most. You can often do a lot more by addressing your wife directly than battling through the courts – court should be a last resort when your wife simply won’t give in and listen to reason.

More information on fathers rights.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Holcy_Thompson_III
http://EzineArticles.com/?Fathers-Rights&id=6627520

In the past era there were no legal rights for grandparents towards their grandchildren. However, with the rise in child abuse cases and increase in divorce rate, courts have allowed custodial and visitation rights for grandparents. If you are denied access to your grandchildren and you are interested in taking custody of your grandchildren in the best interest of them, then it is better to get to know your grandparent custody rights before filing a law suit.

Basically, there are two types of custody. One is physical custody and the other is legal custody. Physical custody is where the child lives with you physically. In the case of physical custody, either of the child’s parents have every right to take the kid away from you. Legal custody is where you have every right to make decision regarding your grandchildren’s life. In order to take legal custody of your grandchildren, you must file a law suit and win the battle within the court.

Under what circumstances can you win grandparent custody rights in the court of law?

o Where both parents are incapable:

If you could prove with evidence that both parents are not capable enough to take good care of your grandchildren, then there is a good chance of winning the grandparent custody rights. These are cases where the parents are involved in drug usage and cases where the parents are not financially sound enough to give good life for their kid.

o When the child is being neglected:

You could win custody of your grandchild, if you could prove that the child is being neglected by either or both the parents and the child is growing in an unsafe environment. You should be able to prove the court that you would like to take custody of the grandchild in the best interest of him/her.

o Where child abuse takes place:

If you could prove that the child is being abused physically or sexually or mentally, then you could win the legal custodial rights.

Even before you decide to file a suit to take custody of your grandchildren think of the following:

o See if you could really make a difference in the kid’s life by taking custody of him/her.

o See if you are financially sound enough to take custody or meet the expenses of your grandchildren.

o See if the child can really connect well with you and be more comfortable in your custody than with their parents.

As the grandparents rights differ from state to state, get to know your state law before filing a suit for your custodial rights.

Legal custody is something to consider as a last resort. grandparents custody rights are granted in some states, but vary greatly from state to state. Even after the supreme court spoke against grandparents rights to a grandchild, some states still will uphold the grandparents. To read more go to http://www.squidoo.com/grandparentscustodyrights.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Stephen_Wisley
http://EzineArticles.com/?Are-You-Aware-of-Your-Grandparent-Custody-Rights?&id=3730298

As grandparents watch their child go through a custody dispute, they may wonder if they will get to see their grand kids as much as before. A custody dispute between the parents may cut off a set of grandparents from the parent who isn’t their grandchildren, and this can limit the time that grandparents could see their grandchildren. In order to protect their custody and visitation rights for their grandchildren, here are some things a grandparent can do to help a child custody dispute.

1. Be supportive of the parent, and help them focus on resolving the problem. A grandparent will have more sway over their child than the other parent. They should be supportive and positive during the child custody dispute–but they also shouldn’t encourage a custody battle and tell the parent to not give into any of the other parent’s wishes. If grandparents can be objective during this process and give good advice to the parent then things will go better. The grandparents should help the parent see ways to reconcile with the other parent instead of widening the gap between them. If both parents are able to work through the custody dispute and agree on a parenting plan, it is more likely that they will both be happy with the result.

2. If possible, maintain friendly relations with the other parent. This is very tricky and has to be done in the right way. A grandparent shouldn’t make their child feel like they are abandoning them or making friends with the enemy. In order to maintain a positive relationship with the other parent, the grandparents should explain very clearly what they are doing and why. They can explain to the child that they would still like to see the grandchildren and they are doing this for the sake of the grandchildren. The grandparents can be a neutral party where the grand kids can relax and cope with some of the pressure of the divorce and the dispute. This can also help the parents resolve some of their differences.

3. Put the needs of the children first. This goes along with the second point. In a situation where things are heated between the parents, grandparents can do a lot to support the grandchildren and help them handle everything that is going on. Visiting grandma and grandpa can provide a much needed break for the children. Grandparents should avoid speaking negatively of either parent and try to help the children see that their parents love them even though things are difficult.

4. Maintain the status quo. There are many different levels of involvement that grandparents have with their grandchildren. Some provide almost daily care to the grandchildren and others visit them frequently. It’s important to maintain this consistency even when the parents divorce. Talk with the parents and help them understand that it is important for the grandchildren to maintain the frequency of visits that they had before. If the grandchildren are with the grandparents daily, help both parents see that the grandparents are neutral and that they aren’t taking sides in the custody dispute.

Discover how Custody X Change can help you work out a child custody dispute and find out more information about grandparent’s child custody and visitation.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Abigail_Vernon
http://EzineArticles.com/?Child-Custody-Dispute—How-Grandparents-Can-Help-With-Custody-and-Visitation&id=2825355

When two parents decide to get a divorce, one of their main concerns is protecting their children and providing for them. Child custody and child support are some of the major issues that must be decided when a divorce involves children. Typically when two parents divorce, either the parents are awarded joint physical custody, or one parent is granted physical custody and the other is given visitation rights. The court will always try to rule in the best interests of the child, and if both parents are willing and able to be involved, the court will usually rule for both parents to have custody. Unfortunately, a parent’s custody or visitation rights can be threatened if one parent decides to move out of state with the children.

Is it Legal to Move the Children After a Divorce?

If a parent with joint or sole physical custody decides to move out of state, s/he must first get approval from the judge or court who decided the divorce. The other parent may feel that his or her parental rights would be compromised by the move and may object to the children being taken out of state. If the judge or court feels that the move would be against the children’s best interests by taking away the opportunity to see one parent, they may deny the request to move. While it may seem inconvenient to have to get the court’s approval, it is important to remember that the move could be detrimental to the children’s lives by denying them time with a parent.

Moving Without Permission

Sometimes a parent decides to move out of state without the court’s permission, effectively taking the children away from the other parent against his or her will. If this happens, the custodial parent who took the children could be held in contempt of court. A civil contempt of court action could order the parent to return the children to the state and appear before the court. If he or she refuses, the offending parent could be heavily fined and/or jailed.

Negotiating with Your Ex Spouse

If you decide that you want to move out of state with your children, or must move away from employment reasons, try talking to your ex about the move first. S/he may object, and it may take some negotiating to decide upon an agreement. Some options that may make the deal more agreeable would be to agree to pay for a plane or train ticket for the other parent to come visit periodically, or to give the other parent more time with the children over school breaks and holidays. If your spouse absolutely will not compromise but the move is necessary for your job, you may appeal to the judge or court and explain the importance of the move.

No matter how a difficult a move may seem for parents, it is often much harder for children. Not only is a move to a new area and school intimidating, the children may also feel isolated from their other parent. If you are considering or anticipating a move to take your children or have your children taken away, consider talking with an experienced child custody lawyer. A child custody attorney can provide sound legal advice and assistance to help assist you with your case.

For More Information

To learn more about child custody issues and how you can protect your parental rights, please visit the website of the Austin child custody lawyers of Slater Kennon & Jameson, LLP today.

Joseph Devine

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joseph_Devine
http://EzineArticles.com/?Moving-Children-Out-of-State-After-a-Divorce&id=3698679

Parenting coordination is a Alternative Dispute Resolution process. It is not therapy, advocacy, or evaluation. A Parenting Coordinator (“PC”) provides the following services to families before, during, and after divorce: assessment, education, coordination, conflict management, mediation, and arbitration – all related to child-focused issues. Typically, the PC is court-appointed in “high conflict” cases after parents have demonstrated their inability to resolve child-focused issues. But wouldn’t it make more sense to be proactive and give families access to parenting coordination as a resource early in the process? Doesn’t it make sense to have a trained professional available to work with both parents to help manage parenting issues and develop new communication and problem-solving skills as their family structure changes through divorce?

I suppose the answer depends on many factors, including the qualifications of the PC, authority of the PC, and accountability of the PC. Since there is no national licensing or certification body for PCs, we must look to state statutes for guidance. Qualifications for a PC established by statute may be intentionally vague, such as one who must be “an individual with appropriate training and qualifications, and must have a perspective acceptable to the court” in Colorado, or a licensed attorney or mental health professional with a specific number of years and type of experience and training in North Carolina. The key is to find a qualified PC whose focus is the Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) process, not therapy, advocacy or evaluation.

Assuming attorneys and families can find suitable professionals to work with them solely on child-focused issues within the ADR process, what authority should the PC have? It is generally accepted that PCs cannot make decisions that affect the substantive rights of the parties (i.e. changes in legal custody, physical custody, visitation and child support). Can the PC be the Final Decision Maker regarding any specific issues? Authority of the PC will determined by state statute and/or court order (if they exist), but what about those families who work with a PC in the absence of a statute or court order? All PCs (whether court-appointed or not) should have an agreement for clients to sign that precisely sets forth the parameters of the PC’s authority as well as all other terms of the professional relationship.

Only a handful of states have PC legislation. Oklahoma was the first state to pass the Parenting Coordinator Act in 2001. Idaho, Oregon, Texas, North Carolina, Colorado and Louisiana have passed PC statutes since then. In Minnesota, “expeditors” are appointed to arbitrate parenting plans. In Arizona, “family court advisors” monitor compliance with visitation and custody orders. In California, “special masters” and “referees” are equivalent to PCs. In Ohio and Wisconsin, arbitration statutes are used to facilitate parenting coordination. In Florida, there are Administrative Orders regarding parenting coordination in some circuits but not in others. Currently, an Ad Hoc Committee of the Family Law Section of The Florida Bar is working on Parenting Coordination legislation. I am a member of this committee together with other attorneys, judges, mental health professionals, mediators, and experts in the field of domestic violence.

PCs are currently working by court appointment (or by private agreement) across the country. In states that do not have statutes, issues arise concerning lack of uniformity about qualifications, authority, accountability and more. Consequently, vigilance is necessary to be certain that PCs are qualified through professional licensure in law or mental health, are trained in mediation, have a working knowledge of child and adolescent development and family systems, have specific training in parenting coordination and the ability to work within the framework of the ADR process, rather than therapy, advocacy or evaluation.

There are some PCs who liken their work to “couples counseling” – it isn’t. Parenting coordination is not therapy. A PC will try to “work their way out of a job.” There are some PCs who take sides with one parent or the other – that’s unusual because the PC is defined as “impartial” or “neutral” in all state statutes. If the PC is court-appointed, the PC may be asked to make recommendations to the Court, however, that does not relieve the PC of the duty to be impartial. The issue of accountability has several dimensions. First, there is the question of opportunity for review of a PC’s decisions and recommendations. In court-appointed cases, there are due process safeguards built into court orders and statutes. However, those PCs who work without a statute or order must have very clear parameters for their work. Next, there is the issue of professional accountability and ethics since there is no entity that oversees the conduct of PCs or can be responsive to a consumer complaint.

It makes sense for families to have access to PCs to do this important work and establish new communication and problem-solving skills early in the divorce process. Families must develop the tools they need to avoid conflicts, rather than continue along a downward spiral as parenting issues spin out of control, damaging children, sometimes irreparably. Why wait until a family situation becomes unbearable to go to court to petition for appointment of a PC? Attorneys and judges do not have to micro-manage parenting issues. It makes more sense for attorneys to recommend working with PCs early in the divorce process to avoid litigation regarding child-focused issues. Why insist on a court order? Stipulations are more in sync with the peaceful divorce model. Let’s make attorneys and families aware of this valuable alternative approach to the practice of family law.

Oh – and what if one parent wants to work with the PC and the other doesn’t? That, too, will have a positive impact on the family – it’s “the power of one.” One person has the ability to shift the family dynamics by developing new communication and conflict management skills. It takes commitment and perseverance — and it works.

• 2008. Cindy Harari. All Rights Reserved.

Cindy Harari, Esq. is an attorney, parenting coordinator, divorce coach, trained mediator, and arbitrator. Ms. Harari’s professional training combined with years of practical experience gives her a unique perspective and distinctive insight regarding issues of divorce and parenting.

For additional information, please visit http://www.solutionsnottalk.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Cindy_Harari,_Esq.
http://EzineArticles.com/?Parenting-Coordination—A-Missing-Piece-Of-The-Divorce-Puzzle&id=1183082